Cargando…

Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?

Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall estimates of infection after orthopaedic surgery with internal devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs eight times that of those without fractur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Christopher, Mayer, Erik, Bernthal, Nicholas, Wenke, Joseph, O'Toole, Robert V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000250
_version_ 1785038424851349504
author Lee, Christopher
Mayer, Erik
Bernthal, Nicholas
Wenke, Joseph
O'Toole, Robert V.
author_facet Lee, Christopher
Mayer, Erik
Bernthal, Nicholas
Wenke, Joseph
O'Toole, Robert V.
author_sort Lee, Christopher
collection PubMed
description Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall estimates of infection after orthopaedic surgery with internal devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs eight times that of those without fracture-related infections and with significantly poorer functional and pain interference PROMIS scores. Orthopaedic infection interventions have been focused on prevention and treatment options. The creation of new modalities for orthopaedic infection treatment can benefit from the understanding of the temporal relationship between bacterial colonization and host–cell integration, a concept referred to as “the race for the surface.” Regarding prevention, host modulation and antibiotic powder use have been explored as viable options to lower infection rates. Orthopaedic infection treatment has additionally continued to evolve, with PO antibiotics demonstrating equivalent efficacy to IV antibiotics for the treatment of orthopaedic infections in recent studies. In conclusion, orthopaedic infections remain difficult clinical dilemmas, although evolving prevention and treatment modalities continue to emerge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101663352023-05-09 Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned? Lee, Christopher Mayer, Erik Bernthal, Nicholas Wenke, Joseph O'Toole, Robert V. OTA Int Standard Review Article Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall estimates of infection after orthopaedic surgery with internal devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs eight times that of those without fracture-related infections and with significantly poorer functional and pain interference PROMIS scores. Orthopaedic infection interventions have been focused on prevention and treatment options. The creation of new modalities for orthopaedic infection treatment can benefit from the understanding of the temporal relationship between bacterial colonization and host–cell integration, a concept referred to as “the race for the surface.” Regarding prevention, host modulation and antibiotic powder use have been explored as viable options to lower infection rates. Orthopaedic infection treatment has additionally continued to evolve, with PO antibiotics demonstrating equivalent efficacy to IV antibiotics for the treatment of orthopaedic infections in recent studies. In conclusion, orthopaedic infections remain difficult clinical dilemmas, although evolving prevention and treatment modalities continue to emerge. Wolters Kluwer 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10166335/ /pubmed/37168032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000250 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Standard Review Article
Lee, Christopher
Mayer, Erik
Bernthal, Nicholas
Wenke, Joseph
O'Toole, Robert V.
Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?
title Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?
title_full Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?
title_fullStr Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?
title_full_unstemmed Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?
title_short Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?
title_sort orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?
topic Standard Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000250
work_keys_str_mv AT leechristopher orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned
AT mayererik orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned
AT bernthalnicholas orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned
AT wenkejoseph orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned
AT otoolerobertv orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned