Cargando…
Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned?
Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall estimates of infection after orthopaedic surgery with internal devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs eight times that of those without fractur...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000250 |
_version_ | 1785038424851349504 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Christopher Mayer, Erik Bernthal, Nicholas Wenke, Joseph O'Toole, Robert V. |
author_facet | Lee, Christopher Mayer, Erik Bernthal, Nicholas Wenke, Joseph O'Toole, Robert V. |
author_sort | Lee, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall estimates of infection after orthopaedic surgery with internal devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs eight times that of those without fracture-related infections and with significantly poorer functional and pain interference PROMIS scores. Orthopaedic infection interventions have been focused on prevention and treatment options. The creation of new modalities for orthopaedic infection treatment can benefit from the understanding of the temporal relationship between bacterial colonization and host–cell integration, a concept referred to as “the race for the surface.” Regarding prevention, host modulation and antibiotic powder use have been explored as viable options to lower infection rates. Orthopaedic infection treatment has additionally continued to evolve, with PO antibiotics demonstrating equivalent efficacy to IV antibiotics for the treatment of orthopaedic infections in recent studies. In conclusion, orthopaedic infections remain difficult clinical dilemmas, although evolving prevention and treatment modalities continue to emerge. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10166335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101663352023-05-09 Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned? Lee, Christopher Mayer, Erik Bernthal, Nicholas Wenke, Joseph O'Toole, Robert V. OTA Int Standard Review Article Orthopaedic infections remain challenging complications to treat, with profound economic impact in addition to patient morbidity. The overall estimates of infection after orthopaedic surgery with internal devices has been estimated at 5%, with hospital costs eight times that of those without fracture-related infections and with significantly poorer functional and pain interference PROMIS scores. Orthopaedic infection interventions have been focused on prevention and treatment options. The creation of new modalities for orthopaedic infection treatment can benefit from the understanding of the temporal relationship between bacterial colonization and host–cell integration, a concept referred to as “the race for the surface.” Regarding prevention, host modulation and antibiotic powder use have been explored as viable options to lower infection rates. Orthopaedic infection treatment has additionally continued to evolve, with PO antibiotics demonstrating equivalent efficacy to IV antibiotics for the treatment of orthopaedic infections in recent studies. In conclusion, orthopaedic infections remain difficult clinical dilemmas, although evolving prevention and treatment modalities continue to emerge. Wolters Kluwer 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10166335/ /pubmed/37168032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000250 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Standard Review Article Lee, Christopher Mayer, Erik Bernthal, Nicholas Wenke, Joseph O'Toole, Robert V. Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned? |
title | Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned? |
title_full | Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned? |
title_fullStr | Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned? |
title_full_unstemmed | Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned? |
title_short | Orthopaedic infections: what have we learned? |
title_sort | orthopaedic infections: what have we learned? |
topic | Standard Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37168032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leechristopher orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned AT mayererik orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned AT bernthalnicholas orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned AT wenkejoseph orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned AT otoolerobertv orthopaedicinfectionswhathavewelearned |