Cargando…

Transformation Zone Assessment Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Before and After Thermal Ablation: Implications for Follow-Up

Thermal ablation (TA) has become the conventional method for treatment of precancerous cervical lesions in low-resource settings. After TA, both the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) and the transformation zone (TZ) may be subject to change. Our aim was to evaluate SCJ and TZ variability after TA. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balli, Christine, Kenfack, Bruno, Horo, Apollinaire, Jeronimo, Jose, Abatsong, Esther, Wisniak, Ania, Vassilakos, Pierre, Petignat, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00241
_version_ 1785038449971036160
author Balli, Christine
Kenfack, Bruno
Horo, Apollinaire
Jeronimo, Jose
Abatsong, Esther
Wisniak, Ania
Vassilakos, Pierre
Petignat, Patrick
author_facet Balli, Christine
Kenfack, Bruno
Horo, Apollinaire
Jeronimo, Jose
Abatsong, Esther
Wisniak, Ania
Vassilakos, Pierre
Petignat, Patrick
author_sort Balli, Christine
collection PubMed
description Thermal ablation (TA) has become the conventional method for treatment of precancerous cervical lesions in low-resource settings. After TA, both the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) and the transformation zone (TZ) may be subject to change. Our aim was to evaluate SCJ and TZ variability after TA. METHODS: Study data were collected in a large prospective trial of a cervical cancer screening campaign in Cameroon. For each patient, two sets of cervical photos (native and with acetic acid) were taken before and 6-12 months after TA. The SCJ and TZ were evaluated independently by three observers according to the WHO nomenclature. When discordances were observed between the type of TZ and SCJ selected by each observer, a corrected TZ was established on the basis of the SCJ categorization. Interobserver agreement for TZ interpretation was evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient for agreement between two observers and Fleiss' kappa between three observers. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive participants were included in the analysis. Seventy-six percent were interpreted as TZ1-2, and 24% as TZ3 before TA. In 56% of cases, the entire SCJ could not be entirely visualized after TA, thus being recategorized as TZ3. Interobserver agreement was fair for diagnosis before TA (Kappa coefficient, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.45) and moderate for diagnosis after TA (Kappa coefficient, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50). After TA, 36% progressed from TZ1-2 to TZ3, with a moderate interobserver agreement (Kappa coefficient, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.54). CONCLUSION: We observed a shift of the SCJ into the endocervical canal after TA. A significant proportion of participants had TZ 3 after treatment, raising the question of visual inspection with acetic acid's applicability as a first-line follow-up examination method after TA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101664732023-05-09 Transformation Zone Assessment Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Before and After Thermal Ablation: Implications for Follow-Up Balli, Christine Kenfack, Bruno Horo, Apollinaire Jeronimo, Jose Abatsong, Esther Wisniak, Ania Vassilakos, Pierre Petignat, Patrick JCO Glob Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Thermal ablation (TA) has become the conventional method for treatment of precancerous cervical lesions in low-resource settings. After TA, both the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) and the transformation zone (TZ) may be subject to change. Our aim was to evaluate SCJ and TZ variability after TA. METHODS: Study data were collected in a large prospective trial of a cervical cancer screening campaign in Cameroon. For each patient, two sets of cervical photos (native and with acetic acid) were taken before and 6-12 months after TA. The SCJ and TZ were evaluated independently by three observers according to the WHO nomenclature. When discordances were observed between the type of TZ and SCJ selected by each observer, a corrected TZ was established on the basis of the SCJ categorization. Interobserver agreement for TZ interpretation was evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient for agreement between two observers and Fleiss' kappa between three observers. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive participants were included in the analysis. Seventy-six percent were interpreted as TZ1-2, and 24% as TZ3 before TA. In 56% of cases, the entire SCJ could not be entirely visualized after TA, thus being recategorized as TZ3. Interobserver agreement was fair for diagnosis before TA (Kappa coefficient, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.45) and moderate for diagnosis after TA (Kappa coefficient, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.50). After TA, 36% progressed from TZ1-2 to TZ3, with a moderate interobserver agreement (Kappa coefficient, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.54). CONCLUSION: We observed a shift of the SCJ into the endocervical canal after TA. A significant proportion of participants had TZ 3 after treatment, raising the question of visual inspection with acetic acid's applicability as a first-line follow-up examination method after TA. Wolters Kluwer Health 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10166473/ /pubmed/36854076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00241 Text en © 2023 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Balli, Christine
Kenfack, Bruno
Horo, Apollinaire
Jeronimo, Jose
Abatsong, Esther
Wisniak, Ania
Vassilakos, Pierre
Petignat, Patrick
Transformation Zone Assessment Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Before and After Thermal Ablation: Implications for Follow-Up
title Transformation Zone Assessment Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Before and After Thermal Ablation: Implications for Follow-Up
title_full Transformation Zone Assessment Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Before and After Thermal Ablation: Implications for Follow-Up
title_fullStr Transformation Zone Assessment Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Before and After Thermal Ablation: Implications for Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Transformation Zone Assessment Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Before and After Thermal Ablation: Implications for Follow-Up
title_short Transformation Zone Assessment Using Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid Before and After Thermal Ablation: Implications for Follow-Up
title_sort transformation zone assessment using visual inspection with acetic acid before and after thermal ablation: implications for follow-up
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.22.00241
work_keys_str_mv AT ballichristine transformationzoneassessmentusingvisualinspectionwithaceticacidbeforeandafterthermalablationimplicationsforfollowup
AT kenfackbruno transformationzoneassessmentusingvisualinspectionwithaceticacidbeforeandafterthermalablationimplicationsforfollowup
AT horoapollinaire transformationzoneassessmentusingvisualinspectionwithaceticacidbeforeandafterthermalablationimplicationsforfollowup
AT jeronimojose transformationzoneassessmentusingvisualinspectionwithaceticacidbeforeandafterthermalablationimplicationsforfollowup
AT abatsongesther transformationzoneassessmentusingvisualinspectionwithaceticacidbeforeandafterthermalablationimplicationsforfollowup
AT wisniakania transformationzoneassessmentusingvisualinspectionwithaceticacidbeforeandafterthermalablationimplicationsforfollowup
AT vassilakospierre transformationzoneassessmentusingvisualinspectionwithaceticacidbeforeandafterthermalablationimplicationsforfollowup
AT petignatpatrick transformationzoneassessmentusingvisualinspectionwithaceticacidbeforeandafterthermalablationimplicationsforfollowup