Cargando…

Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates

Objective  To understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinical pregnancy rates and analyze factors that may have influenced their outcome. Methods  This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary-care Brazilian fertility cen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida, Neto, Ricardo Pasquini, Morila, Mariana Cristina Gomes, Curimbaba, Jean Borges, Pasquini, Daniela Sasso, Felchner, Paulo Cesar Zimmermann, Wandresen, Gustavo, Pachnicki, Jan Pawel Andrade
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768459
_version_ 1785038486140616704
author Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida
Neto, Ricardo Pasquini
Morila, Mariana Cristina Gomes
Curimbaba, Jean Borges
Pasquini, Daniela Sasso
Felchner, Paulo Cesar Zimmermann
Wandresen, Gustavo
Pachnicki, Jan Pawel Andrade
author_facet Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida
Neto, Ricardo Pasquini
Morila, Mariana Cristina Gomes
Curimbaba, Jean Borges
Pasquini, Daniela Sasso
Felchner, Paulo Cesar Zimmermann
Wandresen, Gustavo
Pachnicki, Jan Pawel Andrade
author_sort Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida
collection PubMed
description Objective  To understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinical pregnancy rates and analyze factors that may have influenced their outcome. Methods  This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary-care Brazilian fertility center. All fresh IVF and embryo warming cycles performed from March 11 to December 31, 2018–2021 were analyzed, and their data were used to calculate fertilization, embryo cleavage, cycle cancellation, embryo transfer (ET), and clinical pregnancy rates. Statistical tests were used to evaluate the alterations found. Logistic regression models were used to explore the association of the categorical variables with the observed clinical pregnancy rates. Data from 2018 and 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 and 2021 (pandemic) were grouped. Results  A total of 756 cycles were analyzed ( n  = 360 prepandemic and n  = 396 pandemic). The age group of the patients, fertilization rates, and cleavage rates did not have significant differences ( p  > 0.05). There was a reduction in the percentage of fresh IVF and an increase in embryo warming cycles ( p  = 0.005) during the pandemic. There was also an increase in fresh cycle cancellations ( p  < 0.001) and a reduction in ET rates ( p  < 0.001). The pandemic had a negative impact on clinical pregnancy rates ( p  < 0.001) especially due to the increase in fresh cycle cancellations ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion  Embryo warming cycles with subsequent frozen-thawed ET were presented as a viable alternative to continue assisted reproductive treatments against pandemic restrictions on fresh cycles, ensuring clinical pregnancy, albeit at a lower rate than that of the prepandemic period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101666472023-07-27 Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida Neto, Ricardo Pasquini Morila, Mariana Cristina Gomes Curimbaba, Jean Borges Pasquini, Daniela Sasso Felchner, Paulo Cesar Zimmermann Wandresen, Gustavo Pachnicki, Jan Pawel Andrade Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective  To understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinical pregnancy rates and analyze factors that may have influenced their outcome. Methods  This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary-care Brazilian fertility center. All fresh IVF and embryo warming cycles performed from March 11 to December 31, 2018–2021 were analyzed, and their data were used to calculate fertilization, embryo cleavage, cycle cancellation, embryo transfer (ET), and clinical pregnancy rates. Statistical tests were used to evaluate the alterations found. Logistic regression models were used to explore the association of the categorical variables with the observed clinical pregnancy rates. Data from 2018 and 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 and 2021 (pandemic) were grouped. Results  A total of 756 cycles were analyzed ( n  = 360 prepandemic and n  = 396 pandemic). The age group of the patients, fertilization rates, and cleavage rates did not have significant differences ( p  > 0.05). There was a reduction in the percentage of fresh IVF and an increase in embryo warming cycles ( p  = 0.005) during the pandemic. There was also an increase in fresh cycle cancellations ( p  < 0.001) and a reduction in ET rates ( p  < 0.001). The pandemic had a negative impact on clinical pregnancy rates ( p  < 0.001) especially due to the increase in fresh cycle cancellations ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion  Embryo warming cycles with subsequent frozen-thawed ET were presented as a viable alternative to continue assisted reproductive treatments against pandemic restrictions on fresh cycles, ensuring clinical pregnancy, albeit at a lower rate than that of the prepandemic period. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10166647/ /pubmed/37105198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768459 Text en Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida
Neto, Ricardo Pasquini
Morila, Mariana Cristina Gomes
Curimbaba, Jean Borges
Pasquini, Daniela Sasso
Felchner, Paulo Cesar Zimmermann
Wandresen, Gustavo
Pachnicki, Jan Pawel Andrade
Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates
title Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates
title_full Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates
title_fullStr Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates
title_full_unstemmed Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates
title_short Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates
title_sort fertility does not quarantine: coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic impacts on in vitro fertilization clinical pregnancy rates
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768459
work_keys_str_mv AT vieirafernandadealmeida fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates
AT netoricardopasquini fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates
AT morilamarianacristinagomes fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates
AT curimbabajeanborges fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates
AT pasquinidanielasasso fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates
AT felchnerpaulocesarzimmermann fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates
AT wandresengustavo fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates
AT pachnickijanpawelandrade fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates