Cargando…
Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates
Objective To understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinical pregnancy rates and analyze factors that may have influenced their outcome. Methods This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary-care Brazilian fertility cen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768459 |
_version_ | 1785038486140616704 |
---|---|
author | Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida Neto, Ricardo Pasquini Morila, Mariana Cristina Gomes Curimbaba, Jean Borges Pasquini, Daniela Sasso Felchner, Paulo Cesar Zimmermann Wandresen, Gustavo Pachnicki, Jan Pawel Andrade |
author_facet | Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida Neto, Ricardo Pasquini Morila, Mariana Cristina Gomes Curimbaba, Jean Borges Pasquini, Daniela Sasso Felchner, Paulo Cesar Zimmermann Wandresen, Gustavo Pachnicki, Jan Pawel Andrade |
author_sort | Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinical pregnancy rates and analyze factors that may have influenced their outcome. Methods This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary-care Brazilian fertility center. All fresh IVF and embryo warming cycles performed from March 11 to December 31, 2018–2021 were analyzed, and their data were used to calculate fertilization, embryo cleavage, cycle cancellation, embryo transfer (ET), and clinical pregnancy rates. Statistical tests were used to evaluate the alterations found. Logistic regression models were used to explore the association of the categorical variables with the observed clinical pregnancy rates. Data from 2018 and 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 and 2021 (pandemic) were grouped. Results A total of 756 cycles were analyzed ( n = 360 prepandemic and n = 396 pandemic). The age group of the patients, fertilization rates, and cleavage rates did not have significant differences ( p > 0.05). There was a reduction in the percentage of fresh IVF and an increase in embryo warming cycles ( p = 0.005) during the pandemic. There was also an increase in fresh cycle cancellations ( p < 0.001) and a reduction in ET rates ( p < 0.001). The pandemic had a negative impact on clinical pregnancy rates ( p < 0.001) especially due to the increase in fresh cycle cancellations ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Embryo warming cycles with subsequent frozen-thawed ET were presented as a viable alternative to continue assisted reproductive treatments against pandemic restrictions on fresh cycles, ensuring clinical pregnancy, albeit at a lower rate than that of the prepandemic period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10166647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101666472023-07-27 Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida Neto, Ricardo Pasquini Morila, Mariana Cristina Gomes Curimbaba, Jean Borges Pasquini, Daniela Sasso Felchner, Paulo Cesar Zimmermann Wandresen, Gustavo Pachnicki, Jan Pawel Andrade Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective To understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinical pregnancy rates and analyze factors that may have influenced their outcome. Methods This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a tertiary-care Brazilian fertility center. All fresh IVF and embryo warming cycles performed from March 11 to December 31, 2018–2021 were analyzed, and their data were used to calculate fertilization, embryo cleavage, cycle cancellation, embryo transfer (ET), and clinical pregnancy rates. Statistical tests were used to evaluate the alterations found. Logistic regression models were used to explore the association of the categorical variables with the observed clinical pregnancy rates. Data from 2018 and 2019 (prepandemic) and 2020 and 2021 (pandemic) were grouped. Results A total of 756 cycles were analyzed ( n = 360 prepandemic and n = 396 pandemic). The age group of the patients, fertilization rates, and cleavage rates did not have significant differences ( p > 0.05). There was a reduction in the percentage of fresh IVF and an increase in embryo warming cycles ( p = 0.005) during the pandemic. There was also an increase in fresh cycle cancellations ( p < 0.001) and a reduction in ET rates ( p < 0.001). The pandemic had a negative impact on clinical pregnancy rates ( p < 0.001) especially due to the increase in fresh cycle cancellations ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Embryo warming cycles with subsequent frozen-thawed ET were presented as a viable alternative to continue assisted reproductive treatments against pandemic restrictions on fresh cycles, ensuring clinical pregnancy, albeit at a lower rate than that of the prepandemic period. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10166647/ /pubmed/37105198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768459 Text en Federação Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vieira, Fernanda de Almeida Neto, Ricardo Pasquini Morila, Mariana Cristina Gomes Curimbaba, Jean Borges Pasquini, Daniela Sasso Felchner, Paulo Cesar Zimmermann Wandresen, Gustavo Pachnicki, Jan Pawel Andrade Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates |
title | Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates |
title_full | Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates |
title_fullStr | Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates |
title_full_unstemmed | Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates |
title_short | Fertility Does not Quarantine: Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Impacts on in Vitro Fertilization Clinical Pregnancy Rates |
title_sort | fertility does not quarantine: coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic impacts on in vitro fertilization clinical pregnancy rates |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768459 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vieirafernandadealmeida fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates AT netoricardopasquini fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates AT morilamarianacristinagomes fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates AT curimbabajeanborges fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates AT pasquinidanielasasso fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates AT felchnerpaulocesarzimmermann fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates AT wandresengustavo fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates AT pachnickijanpawelandrade fertilitydoesnotquarantinecoronavirusdisease2019pandemicimpactsoninvitrofertilizationclinicalpregnancyrates |