Cargando…

Perspectives from research and practice: A survey on external load monitoring and bone in sport

INTRODUCTION: There is limited information regarding the association between external load and estimated bone load in sport, which may be important due to the influence exercise can have on bone accrual and injury risk. The aim of this study was to identify external load measuring tools used by supp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Reece, James, Ruth, Barnett, Cleveland T., Sale, Craig, Varley, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1150052
_version_ 1785038525385670656
author Scott, Reece
James, Ruth
Barnett, Cleveland T.
Sale, Craig
Varley, Ian
author_facet Scott, Reece
James, Ruth
Barnett, Cleveland T.
Sale, Craig
Varley, Ian
author_sort Scott, Reece
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is limited information regarding the association between external load and estimated bone load in sport, which may be important due to the influence exercise can have on bone accrual and injury risk. The aim of this study was to identify external load measuring tools used by support staff to estimate bone load and assess if these methodologies were supported in research. METHODS: A survey was comprised of 19 multiple choice questions and the option to elaborate on if/how they monitor external load and if/how they used them to estimate bone load. A narrative review was performed to assess how external load is associated to bone in research. RESULTS: Participants were required to be working as support staff in applied sport. Support staff (n = 71) were recruited worldwide with the majority (85%) working with professional elite athletes. 92% of support staff monitored external load in their organisation, but only 28% used it to estimate bone load. DISCUSSION: GPS is the most commonly used method to estimate bone load, but there is a lack of research assessing GPS metrics with bone load. Accelerometry and force plates were among the most prevalent methods used to assess external load, but a lack of bone specific measurements were reported by support staff. Further research exploring how external load relates to bone is needed as there is no consensus on which method of external load is best to estimate bone load in an applied setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101668242023-05-10 Perspectives from research and practice: A survey on external load monitoring and bone in sport Scott, Reece James, Ruth Barnett, Cleveland T. Sale, Craig Varley, Ian Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living INTRODUCTION: There is limited information regarding the association between external load and estimated bone load in sport, which may be important due to the influence exercise can have on bone accrual and injury risk. The aim of this study was to identify external load measuring tools used by support staff to estimate bone load and assess if these methodologies were supported in research. METHODS: A survey was comprised of 19 multiple choice questions and the option to elaborate on if/how they monitor external load and if/how they used them to estimate bone load. A narrative review was performed to assess how external load is associated to bone in research. RESULTS: Participants were required to be working as support staff in applied sport. Support staff (n = 71) were recruited worldwide with the majority (85%) working with professional elite athletes. 92% of support staff monitored external load in their organisation, but only 28% used it to estimate bone load. DISCUSSION: GPS is the most commonly used method to estimate bone load, but there is a lack of research assessing GPS metrics with bone load. Accelerometry and force plates were among the most prevalent methods used to assess external load, but a lack of bone specific measurements were reported by support staff. Further research exploring how external load relates to bone is needed as there is no consensus on which method of external load is best to estimate bone load in an applied setting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10166824/ /pubmed/37181251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1150052 Text en © 2023 Scott, James, Barnett, Sale and Varley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Scott, Reece
James, Ruth
Barnett, Cleveland T.
Sale, Craig
Varley, Ian
Perspectives from research and practice: A survey on external load monitoring and bone in sport
title Perspectives from research and practice: A survey on external load monitoring and bone in sport
title_full Perspectives from research and practice: A survey on external load monitoring and bone in sport
title_fullStr Perspectives from research and practice: A survey on external load monitoring and bone in sport
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives from research and practice: A survey on external load monitoring and bone in sport
title_short Perspectives from research and practice: A survey on external load monitoring and bone in sport
title_sort perspectives from research and practice: a survey on external load monitoring and bone in sport
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1150052
work_keys_str_mv AT scottreece perspectivesfromresearchandpracticeasurveyonexternalloadmonitoringandboneinsport
AT jamesruth perspectivesfromresearchandpracticeasurveyonexternalloadmonitoringandboneinsport
AT barnettclevelandt perspectivesfromresearchandpracticeasurveyonexternalloadmonitoringandboneinsport
AT salecraig perspectivesfromresearchandpracticeasurveyonexternalloadmonitoringandboneinsport
AT varleyian perspectivesfromresearchandpracticeasurveyonexternalloadmonitoringandboneinsport