Cargando…

A systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The experiences and changes that come along with old age may lead to a feeling of loneliness, usually followed by negative physical and mental manifestations. In this systematic review, we evaluated the existing tools to assess loneliness in older adults. METHODS: We per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bugallo-Carrera, César, Dosil-Díaz, Carlos, Anido-Rifón, Luis, Pacheco-Lorenzo, Moisés, Fernández-Iglesias, Manuel J., Gandoy-Crego, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101462
_version_ 1785038535084998656
author Bugallo-Carrera, César
Dosil-Díaz, Carlos
Anido-Rifón, Luis
Pacheco-Lorenzo, Moisés
Fernández-Iglesias, Manuel J.
Gandoy-Crego, Manuel
author_facet Bugallo-Carrera, César
Dosil-Díaz, Carlos
Anido-Rifón, Luis
Pacheco-Lorenzo, Moisés
Fernández-Iglesias, Manuel J.
Gandoy-Crego, Manuel
author_sort Bugallo-Carrera, César
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The experiences and changes that come along with old age may lead to a feeling of loneliness, usually followed by negative physical and mental manifestations. In this systematic review, we evaluated the existing tools to assess loneliness in older adults. METHODS: We performed a literature search in the Web of Science, Medline, and PsycINFO, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After, we examined the psychometric properties of the instruments with a focus on reliability, validity, and main conclusions. RESULTS: We included 27 articles published between 1996 and 2021. CONCLUSION: To date, there are few instruments to assess loneliness in older adults. In general, they present adequate psychometric properties, although it is true that some scales show somewhat low levels of reliability and validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101668652023-05-10 A systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults Bugallo-Carrera, César Dosil-Díaz, Carlos Anido-Rifón, Luis Pacheco-Lorenzo, Moisés Fernández-Iglesias, Manuel J. Gandoy-Crego, Manuel Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The experiences and changes that come along with old age may lead to a feeling of loneliness, usually followed by negative physical and mental manifestations. In this systematic review, we evaluated the existing tools to assess loneliness in older adults. METHODS: We performed a literature search in the Web of Science, Medline, and PsycINFO, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After, we examined the psychometric properties of the instruments with a focus on reliability, validity, and main conclusions. RESULTS: We included 27 articles published between 1996 and 2021. CONCLUSION: To date, there are few instruments to assess loneliness in older adults. In general, they present adequate psychometric properties, although it is true that some scales show somewhat low levels of reliability and validity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10166865/ /pubmed/37179898 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101462 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bugallo-Carrera, Dosil-Díaz, Anido-Rifón, Pacheco-Lorenzo, Fernández-Iglesias and Gandoy-Crego. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bugallo-Carrera, César
Dosil-Díaz, Carlos
Anido-Rifón, Luis
Pacheco-Lorenzo, Moisés
Fernández-Iglesias, Manuel J.
Gandoy-Crego, Manuel
A systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults
title A systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults
title_full A systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults
title_fullStr A systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults
title_short A systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults
title_sort systematic review evaluating loneliness assessment instruments in older adults
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179898
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101462
work_keys_str_mv AT bugallocarreracesar asystematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT dosildiazcarlos asystematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT anidorifonluis asystematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT pachecolorenzomoises asystematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT fernandeziglesiasmanuelj asystematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT gandoycregomanuel asystematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT bugallocarreracesar systematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT dosildiazcarlos systematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT anidorifonluis systematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT pachecolorenzomoises systematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT fernandeziglesiasmanuelj systematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults
AT gandoycregomanuel systematicreviewevaluatinglonelinessassessmentinstrumentsinolderadults