Cargando…

Role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy—A single‐center retrospective cohort study

AIM: To evaluate the role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy. METHODS: Consecutive patients are recruited. Rates of complication and postoperative length of stay are compared between the study and control groups. Progression‐fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Jingyong, Liu, Yuan, Wu, Mingxiao, Song, Jinghai, Li, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36880113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5613
_version_ 1785038544791666688
author Xu, Jingyong
Liu, Yuan
Wu, Mingxiao
Song, Jinghai
Li, Chen
author_facet Xu, Jingyong
Liu, Yuan
Wu, Mingxiao
Song, Jinghai
Li, Chen
author_sort Xu, Jingyong
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy. METHODS: Consecutive patients are recruited. Rates of complication and postoperative length of stay are compared between the study and control groups. Progression‐free survival (PFS) of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) after ablation are compared. Complete ablation rates are compared and optimal tumor size is calculated by ROC curve analysis. Risk factors of incomplete ablation are determined by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Totally 73 patients with 153 lesions were included. No significant differences in the rate of complication were found between the study and control groups. PFS of CRLM in laparoscopic, intraoperative CEUS, and laparoscopic CEUS groups are all longer than their control groups. Complete ablation rates of laparoscopic, intraoperative CEUS, and laparoscopic CEUS groups are all higher than in their control groups with statistical significance. A tumor size of 2.15 cm is determined to be the optimal cut‐off with the area under the ROC curve of 0.854, 95% CI (0.764, 0.944), p = 0.001. In logistic regression analysis, tumor size [OR 20.425, 95% CI (3.136, 133.045), p = 0.002] and location of segments VII and VIII [OR 9.433, 95% CI (1.364, 65.223), p = 0.023] are calculated to be the risk factors of incomplete ablation, meanwhile, intraoperative CEUS shows to be a protective factor in univariate analysis [OR 0.110, 95% CI (0.013, 0.915), p = 0.041]. CONCLUSION: Sonazoid‐enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation is safe and effective to treat liver malignancy. We should pay attention to the ablation planning of larger tumors and tumors in special locations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101669052023-05-10 Role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy—A single‐center retrospective cohort study Xu, Jingyong Liu, Yuan Wu, Mingxiao Song, Jinghai Li, Chen Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES AIM: To evaluate the role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy. METHODS: Consecutive patients are recruited. Rates of complication and postoperative length of stay are compared between the study and control groups. Progression‐free survival (PFS) of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) after ablation are compared. Complete ablation rates are compared and optimal tumor size is calculated by ROC curve analysis. Risk factors of incomplete ablation are determined by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Totally 73 patients with 153 lesions were included. No significant differences in the rate of complication were found between the study and control groups. PFS of CRLM in laparoscopic, intraoperative CEUS, and laparoscopic CEUS groups are all longer than their control groups. Complete ablation rates of laparoscopic, intraoperative CEUS, and laparoscopic CEUS groups are all higher than in their control groups with statistical significance. A tumor size of 2.15 cm is determined to be the optimal cut‐off with the area under the ROC curve of 0.854, 95% CI (0.764, 0.944), p = 0.001. In logistic regression analysis, tumor size [OR 20.425, 95% CI (3.136, 133.045), p = 0.002] and location of segments VII and VIII [OR 9.433, 95% CI (1.364, 65.223), p = 0.023] are calculated to be the risk factors of incomplete ablation, meanwhile, intraoperative CEUS shows to be a protective factor in univariate analysis [OR 0.110, 95% CI (0.013, 0.915), p = 0.041]. CONCLUSION: Sonazoid‐enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation is safe and effective to treat liver malignancy. We should pay attention to the ablation planning of larger tumors and tumors in special locations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10166905/ /pubmed/36880113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5613 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Xu, Jingyong
Liu, Yuan
Wu, Mingxiao
Song, Jinghai
Li, Chen
Role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy—A single‐center retrospective cohort study
title Role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy—A single‐center retrospective cohort study
title_full Role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy—A single‐center retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy—A single‐center retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy—A single‐center retrospective cohort study
title_short Role of Sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy—A single‐center retrospective cohort study
title_sort role of sonazoid enhanced ultrasound assistant laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in treating liver malignancy—a single‐center retrospective cohort study
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36880113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5613
work_keys_str_mv AT xujingyong roleofsonazoidenhancedultrasoundassistantlaparoscopicradiofrequencyablationintreatinglivermalignancyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liuyuan roleofsonazoidenhancedultrasoundassistantlaparoscopicradiofrequencyablationintreatinglivermalignancyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wumingxiao roleofsonazoidenhancedultrasoundassistantlaparoscopicradiofrequencyablationintreatinglivermalignancyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT songjinghai roleofsonazoidenhancedultrasoundassistantlaparoscopicradiofrequencyablationintreatinglivermalignancyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lichen roleofsonazoidenhancedultrasoundassistantlaparoscopicradiofrequencyablationintreatinglivermalignancyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy