Cargando…

Progression patterns and site‐specific responses in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab

BACKGROUND: While the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reportedly varies among metastatic sites and progression patterns (classified as systemic progression [SP] or mixed progression [MP]), the clinical efficacy of ICIs against gastric cancer remains unclear. The response to nivolumab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadono, Toru, Iwasa, Satoru, Nagashima, Kengo, Oshima, Kotoe, Yamamoto, Shun, Hirano, Hidekazu, Okita, Natsuko, Shoji, Hirokazu, Honma, Yoshitaka, Takashima, Atsuo, Kato, Ken, Ushijima, Toshikazu, Boku, Narikazu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5689
_version_ 1785038550169812992
author Kadono, Toru
Iwasa, Satoru
Nagashima, Kengo
Oshima, Kotoe
Yamamoto, Shun
Hirano, Hidekazu
Okita, Natsuko
Shoji, Hirokazu
Honma, Yoshitaka
Takashima, Atsuo
Kato, Ken
Ushijima, Toshikazu
Boku, Narikazu
author_facet Kadono, Toru
Iwasa, Satoru
Nagashima, Kengo
Oshima, Kotoe
Yamamoto, Shun
Hirano, Hidekazu
Okita, Natsuko
Shoji, Hirokazu
Honma, Yoshitaka
Takashima, Atsuo
Kato, Ken
Ushijima, Toshikazu
Boku, Narikazu
author_sort Kadono, Toru
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reportedly varies among metastatic sites and progression patterns (classified as systemic progression [SP] or mixed progression [MP]), the clinical efficacy of ICIs against gastric cancer remains unclear. The response to nivolumab depending on metastatic site and clinical outcomes according to progression pattern in patients with advanced gastric cancer was investigated retrospectively. METHODS: Seventy‐four advanced gastric cancer patients with measurable lesions who received nivolumab monotherapy between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled. Progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival, response at each metastatic site, and clinical outcomes according to progression pattern were analyzed retrospectively. SP and MP were defined as progression in more than half of the lesions and progression in half or fewer of the lesions, respectively, in cases evaluated as progressive disease. RESULTS: Thirty‐five (47%) and 27 (36%) patients had SP and MP, respectively, and 12 (16%) patients experienced no progression. The progression rates of target lesions in the lung (44%) and liver (57%) were significantly higher than that in the lymph nodes (18%) (lung vs. lymph node, p < 0.001; liver vs. lymph node, p = 0.03). Patients with MP had superior PFS to those with SP (median, 2.6 vs. 1.5 months; HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23–0.76; p = 0.004). In MP group, patients with treatment beyond progression (TBP) with nivolumab had a trend of longer post‐progression survival than those without TBP (median, 8.0 vs. 4.0 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.23–1.29; p = 0.161). CONCLUSION: Patients with MP had a longer PFS than those with SP. Lung and liver metastases had a poorer response to an ICI than lymph node metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10166927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101669272023-05-10 Progression patterns and site‐specific responses in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab Kadono, Toru Iwasa, Satoru Nagashima, Kengo Oshima, Kotoe Yamamoto, Shun Hirano, Hidekazu Okita, Natsuko Shoji, Hirokazu Honma, Yoshitaka Takashima, Atsuo Kato, Ken Ushijima, Toshikazu Boku, Narikazu Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: While the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) reportedly varies among metastatic sites and progression patterns (classified as systemic progression [SP] or mixed progression [MP]), the clinical efficacy of ICIs against gastric cancer remains unclear. The response to nivolumab depending on metastatic site and clinical outcomes according to progression pattern in patients with advanced gastric cancer was investigated retrospectively. METHODS: Seventy‐four advanced gastric cancer patients with measurable lesions who received nivolumab monotherapy between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled. Progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival, response at each metastatic site, and clinical outcomes according to progression pattern were analyzed retrospectively. SP and MP were defined as progression in more than half of the lesions and progression in half or fewer of the lesions, respectively, in cases evaluated as progressive disease. RESULTS: Thirty‐five (47%) and 27 (36%) patients had SP and MP, respectively, and 12 (16%) patients experienced no progression. The progression rates of target lesions in the lung (44%) and liver (57%) were significantly higher than that in the lymph nodes (18%) (lung vs. lymph node, p < 0.001; liver vs. lymph node, p = 0.03). Patients with MP had superior PFS to those with SP (median, 2.6 vs. 1.5 months; HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23–0.76; p = 0.004). In MP group, patients with treatment beyond progression (TBP) with nivolumab had a trend of longer post‐progression survival than those without TBP (median, 8.0 vs. 4.0 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.23–1.29; p = 0.161). CONCLUSION: Patients with MP had a longer PFS than those with SP. Lung and liver metastases had a poorer response to an ICI than lymph node metastases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10166927/ /pubmed/36789624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5689 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Kadono, Toru
Iwasa, Satoru
Nagashima, Kengo
Oshima, Kotoe
Yamamoto, Shun
Hirano, Hidekazu
Okita, Natsuko
Shoji, Hirokazu
Honma, Yoshitaka
Takashima, Atsuo
Kato, Ken
Ushijima, Toshikazu
Boku, Narikazu
Progression patterns and site‐specific responses in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab
title Progression patterns and site‐specific responses in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab
title_full Progression patterns and site‐specific responses in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab
title_fullStr Progression patterns and site‐specific responses in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab
title_full_unstemmed Progression patterns and site‐specific responses in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab
title_short Progression patterns and site‐specific responses in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab
title_sort progression patterns and site‐specific responses in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10166927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5689
work_keys_str_mv AT kadonotoru progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT iwasasatoru progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT nagashimakengo progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT oshimakotoe progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT yamamotoshun progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT hiranohidekazu progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT okitanatsuko progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT shojihirokazu progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT honmayoshitaka progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT takashimaatsuo progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT katoken progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT ushijimatoshikazu progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab
AT bokunarikazu progressionpatternsandsitespecificresponsesinadvancedgastriccancerpatientstreatedwithnivolumab