Cargando…

The patients’ experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study

PURPOSE: To gain insight into how patients with primary brain tumors experience MRI, follow-up protocols, and gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) use. METHODS: Primary brain tumor patients answered a survey after their MRI exam. Questions were analyzed to determine trends in patients’ experience...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wamelink, Ivar J. H. G., Hempel, Hugo L., van de Giessen, Elsmarieke, Vries, Mark H. M., De Witt Hamer, Philip, Barkhof, Frederik, Keil, Vera C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04290-x
_version_ 1785038606718468096
author Wamelink, Ivar J. H. G.
Hempel, Hugo L.
van de Giessen, Elsmarieke
Vries, Mark H. M.
De Witt Hamer, Philip
Barkhof, Frederik
Keil, Vera C.
author_facet Wamelink, Ivar J. H. G.
Hempel, Hugo L.
van de Giessen, Elsmarieke
Vries, Mark H. M.
De Witt Hamer, Philip
Barkhof, Frederik
Keil, Vera C.
author_sort Wamelink, Ivar J. H. G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To gain insight into how patients with primary brain tumors experience MRI, follow-up protocols, and gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) use. METHODS: Primary brain tumor patients answered a survey after their MRI exam. Questions were analyzed to determine trends in patients’ experience regarding the scan itself, follow-up frequency, and the use of GBCAs. Subgroup analysis was performed on sex, lesion grade, age, and the number of scans. Subgroup comparison was made using the Pearson chi-square test and the Mann–Whitney U-test for categorical and ordinal questions, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 93 had a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis, and seven were considered to have a slow-growing low-grade tumor after multidisciplinary assessment and follow-up. 61/100 patients were male, with a mean age ± standard deviation of 44 ± 14 years and 46 ± 13 years for the females. Fifty-nine patients had low-grade tumors. Patients consistently underestimated the number of their previous scans. 92% of primary brain tumor patients did not experience the MRI as bothering and 78% would not change the number of follow-up MRIs. 63% of the patients would prefer GBCA-free MRI scans if diagnostically equally accurate. Women found the MRI and receiving intravenous cannulas significantly more uncomfortable than men (p = 0.003). Age, diagnosis, and the number of previous scans had no relevant impact on the patient experience. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary brain tumors experienced current neuro-oncological MRI practice as positive. Especially women would, however, prefer GBCA-free imaging if diagnostically equally accurate. Patient knowledge of GBCAs was limited, indicating improvable patient information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04290-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10167184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101671842023-05-10 The patients’ experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study Wamelink, Ivar J. H. G. Hempel, Hugo L. van de Giessen, Elsmarieke Vries, Mark H. M. De Witt Hamer, Philip Barkhof, Frederik Keil, Vera C. J Neurooncol Research PURPOSE: To gain insight into how patients with primary brain tumors experience MRI, follow-up protocols, and gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) use. METHODS: Primary brain tumor patients answered a survey after their MRI exam. Questions were analyzed to determine trends in patients’ experience regarding the scan itself, follow-up frequency, and the use of GBCAs. Subgroup analysis was performed on sex, lesion grade, age, and the number of scans. Subgroup comparison was made using the Pearson chi-square test and the Mann–Whitney U-test for categorical and ordinal questions, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 93 had a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis, and seven were considered to have a slow-growing low-grade tumor after multidisciplinary assessment and follow-up. 61/100 patients were male, with a mean age ± standard deviation of 44 ± 14 years and 46 ± 13 years for the females. Fifty-nine patients had low-grade tumors. Patients consistently underestimated the number of their previous scans. 92% of primary brain tumor patients did not experience the MRI as bothering and 78% would not change the number of follow-up MRIs. 63% of the patients would prefer GBCA-free MRI scans if diagnostically equally accurate. Women found the MRI and receiving intravenous cannulas significantly more uncomfortable than men (p = 0.003). Age, diagnosis, and the number of previous scans had no relevant impact on the patient experience. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary brain tumors experienced current neuro-oncological MRI practice as positive. Especially women would, however, prefer GBCA-free imaging if diagnostically equally accurate. Patient knowledge of GBCAs was limited, indicating improvable patient information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04290-x. Springer US 2023-03-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10167184/ /pubmed/36977844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04290-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Wamelink, Ivar J. H. G.
Hempel, Hugo L.
van de Giessen, Elsmarieke
Vries, Mark H. M.
De Witt Hamer, Philip
Barkhof, Frederik
Keil, Vera C.
The patients’ experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study
title The patients’ experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study
title_full The patients’ experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study
title_fullStr The patients’ experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study
title_full_unstemmed The patients’ experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study
title_short The patients’ experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study
title_sort patients’ experience of neuroimaging of primary brain tumors: a cross-sectional survey study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04290-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wamelinkivarjhg thepatientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT hempelhugol thepatientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT vandegiessenelsmarieke thepatientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT vriesmarkhm thepatientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT dewitthamerphilip thepatientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT barkhoffrederik thepatientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT keilverac thepatientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT wamelinkivarjhg patientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT hempelhugol patientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT vandegiessenelsmarieke patientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT vriesmarkhm patientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT dewitthamerphilip patientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT barkhoffrederik patientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT keilverac patientsexperienceofneuroimagingofprimarybraintumorsacrosssectionalsurveystudy