Improving visualization of free fibula flap perforators and reducing radiation dose in dual-energy CT angiography

BACKGROUND: The precise assessment of the perforators of the fibula free flap (FFF) is crucial for minimizing procedure-related complications when harvesting the FFF in patients with maxillofacial lesions. This study aims to investigate the utility of virtual noncontrast (VNC) images for radiation dose saving and to determine the optimal energy level of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) reconstructions in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for visualization of the perforators of the fibula free flap (FFF). METHODS: Data from 40 patients with maxillofacial lesions who received lower extremity DECT examinations in the noncontrast and arterial phase were collected in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. To compare VNC images from the arterial phase with true non-contrast images in a DECT protocol (M_0.5-TNC) and to compare VMI images with 0.5 linear images blending from the arterial phase (M_0.5-C), the attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and subjective image quality were assessed in different arteries, muscles, and fat tissues. Two readers evaluated the image quality and visualization of the perforators. The dose-length product (DLP) and CT volume dose index (CTDIvol) were used to determine the radiation dose. RESULTS: Objective and subjective analyses showed no significant difference between the M_0.5-TNC and VNC images in the arteries and muscles (P>0.09 to P>0.99), and VNC imaging could reduce 50% of the radiation dose (P<0.001). Compared with those of the M_0.5-C images, the attenuation and CNR of VMI reconstructions at 40 kiloelectron volt (keV) and 60 keV were higher (P<0.001 to P=0.04). Noise was similar at 60 keV (all P>0.99) and increased at 40 keV (all P<0.001), and the SNR in arteries was increased at 60 keV (P<0.001 to P=0.02) in VMI reconstructions compared with those in the M_0.5-C images. The subjective scores in VMI reconstructions at 40 and 60 keV was higher than those in M_0.5-C images (all P<0.001). The image quality at 60 keV was superior to that at 40 keV (P<0.001), and there was no difference in the visualization of the perforators between 40 and 60 keV (P=0.31). CONCLUSIONS: VNC imaging is a reliable technique for replacing M_0.5-TNC and provides radiation dose saving. The image quality of the 40-keV and 60-keV VMI reconstructions was higher than that of the M_0.5-C images, and 60 keV provided the best assessment of perforators in the tibia.