Cargando…

The potential for different computed tomography-based machine learning networks to automatically segment and differentiate pelvic and sacral osteosarcoma from Ewing’s sarcoma

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore optimal computed tomography (CT)-based machine learning and deep learning methods for the identification of pelvic and sacral osteosarcomas (OS) and Ewing’s sarcomas (ES). METHODS: A total of 185 patients with pathologically confirmed pelvic and sacral OS and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Ping, Wang, Wenjia, Wang, Sicong, Liu, Tao, Sun, Chao, Liu, Xia, Chen, Lei, Hong, Nan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179923
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-1042
_version_ 1785038680151293952
author Yin, Ping
Wang, Wenjia
Wang, Sicong
Liu, Tao
Sun, Chao
Liu, Xia
Chen, Lei
Hong, Nan
author_facet Yin, Ping
Wang, Wenjia
Wang, Sicong
Liu, Tao
Sun, Chao
Liu, Xia
Chen, Lei
Hong, Nan
author_sort Yin, Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore optimal computed tomography (CT)-based machine learning and deep learning methods for the identification of pelvic and sacral osteosarcomas (OS) and Ewing’s sarcomas (ES). METHODS: A total of 185 patients with pathologically confirmed pelvic and sacral OS and ES were analyzed. We first compared the performance of 9 radiomics-based machine learning models, 1 radiomics-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs) model, and 1 3-dimensional (3D) CNN model, respectively. We then proposed a 2-step no-new-Net (nnU-Net) model for the automatic segmentation and identification of OS and ES. The diagnoses by 3 radiologists were also obtained. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used to evaluate the different models. RESULTS: Age, tumor size, and tumor location showed significant differences between OS and ES (P<0.01). For the radiomics-based machine learning models, logistic regression (LR; AUC =0.716, ACC =0.660) performed best in the validation set. However, the radiomics-based CNN model had an AUC of 0.812 and ACC of 0.774 in the validation set, which were higher than those of the 3D CNN model (AUC =0.709, ACC =0.717). Among all the models, the nnU-Net model performed best, with an AUC of 0.835 and an ACC of 0.830 in the validation set, which was significantly higher than the primary physician’s diagnosis (ACCs ranged from 0.757 to 0.811) (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed nnU-Net model could be an end-to-end, non-invasive, and accurate auxiliary diagnostic tool for the differentiation of pelvic and sacral OS and ES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10167450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101674502023-05-10 The potential for different computed tomography-based machine learning networks to automatically segment and differentiate pelvic and sacral osteosarcoma from Ewing’s sarcoma Yin, Ping Wang, Wenjia Wang, Sicong Liu, Tao Sun, Chao Liu, Xia Chen, Lei Hong, Nan Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore optimal computed tomography (CT)-based machine learning and deep learning methods for the identification of pelvic and sacral osteosarcomas (OS) and Ewing’s sarcomas (ES). METHODS: A total of 185 patients with pathologically confirmed pelvic and sacral OS and ES were analyzed. We first compared the performance of 9 radiomics-based machine learning models, 1 radiomics-based convolutional neural networks (CNNs) model, and 1 3-dimensional (3D) CNN model, respectively. We then proposed a 2-step no-new-Net (nnU-Net) model for the automatic segmentation and identification of OS and ES. The diagnoses by 3 radiologists were also obtained. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used to evaluate the different models. RESULTS: Age, tumor size, and tumor location showed significant differences between OS and ES (P<0.01). For the radiomics-based machine learning models, logistic regression (LR; AUC =0.716, ACC =0.660) performed best in the validation set. However, the radiomics-based CNN model had an AUC of 0.812 and ACC of 0.774 in the validation set, which were higher than those of the 3D CNN model (AUC =0.709, ACC =0.717). Among all the models, the nnU-Net model performed best, with an AUC of 0.835 and an ACC of 0.830 in the validation set, which was significantly higher than the primary physician’s diagnosis (ACCs ranged from 0.757 to 0.811) (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed nnU-Net model could be an end-to-end, non-invasive, and accurate auxiliary diagnostic tool for the differentiation of pelvic and sacral OS and ES. AME Publishing Company 2023-04-13 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10167450/ /pubmed/37179923 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-1042 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Yin, Ping
Wang, Wenjia
Wang, Sicong
Liu, Tao
Sun, Chao
Liu, Xia
Chen, Lei
Hong, Nan
The potential for different computed tomography-based machine learning networks to automatically segment and differentiate pelvic and sacral osteosarcoma from Ewing’s sarcoma
title The potential for different computed tomography-based machine learning networks to automatically segment and differentiate pelvic and sacral osteosarcoma from Ewing’s sarcoma
title_full The potential for different computed tomography-based machine learning networks to automatically segment and differentiate pelvic and sacral osteosarcoma from Ewing’s sarcoma
title_fullStr The potential for different computed tomography-based machine learning networks to automatically segment and differentiate pelvic and sacral osteosarcoma from Ewing’s sarcoma
title_full_unstemmed The potential for different computed tomography-based machine learning networks to automatically segment and differentiate pelvic and sacral osteosarcoma from Ewing’s sarcoma
title_short The potential for different computed tomography-based machine learning networks to automatically segment and differentiate pelvic and sacral osteosarcoma from Ewing’s sarcoma
title_sort potential for different computed tomography-based machine learning networks to automatically segment and differentiate pelvic and sacral osteosarcoma from ewing’s sarcoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179923
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-1042
work_keys_str_mv AT yinping thepotentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT wangwenjia thepotentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT wangsicong thepotentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT liutao thepotentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT sunchao thepotentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT liuxia thepotentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT chenlei thepotentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT hongnan thepotentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT yinping potentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT wangwenjia potentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT wangsicong potentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT liutao potentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT sunchao potentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT liuxia potentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT chenlei potentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma
AT hongnan potentialfordifferentcomputedtomographybasedmachinelearningnetworkstoautomaticallysegmentanddifferentiatepelvicandsacralosteosarcomafromewingssarcoma