Cargando…

Layperson Perception of Reflux‐Related Symptoms

OBJECTIVE: To assess for differences of intended meaning in the description of reflux‐related symptoms among otolaryngology patients and clinicians. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional survey‐based study. SETTING: Five tertiary, academic otolaryngology practices. METHODS: Between June 2020 and July 2022,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fischer, Jakob L., Tolisano, Anthony M., Navarro, Alvaro I., Trinh, Lily, Abuzeid, Waleed M., Humphreys, Ian M., Akbar, Nadeem A., Shah, Sharan, Schneider, John S., Riley, Charles A., McCoul, Edward D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.51
_version_ 1785038699038244864
author Fischer, Jakob L.
Tolisano, Anthony M.
Navarro, Alvaro I.
Trinh, Lily
Abuzeid, Waleed M.
Humphreys, Ian M.
Akbar, Nadeem A.
Shah, Sharan
Schneider, John S.
Riley, Charles A.
McCoul, Edward D.
author_facet Fischer, Jakob L.
Tolisano, Anthony M.
Navarro, Alvaro I.
Trinh, Lily
Abuzeid, Waleed M.
Humphreys, Ian M.
Akbar, Nadeem A.
Shah, Sharan
Schneider, John S.
Riley, Charles A.
McCoul, Edward D.
author_sort Fischer, Jakob L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess for differences of intended meaning in the description of reflux‐related symptoms among otolaryngology patients and clinicians. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional survey‐based study. SETTING: Five tertiary, academic otolaryngology practices. METHODS: Between June 2020 and July 2022, a questionnaire consisting of 20 common descriptors of reflux‐related symptoms within four domains (throat‐, chest‐, stomach‐, and sensory‐related symptoms) was completed by patients. Attending otolaryngologists at five academic medical centers then completed the same survey. The primary outcome was to assess differences in patient and clinician perceptions of reflux‐related symptoms. Differences based on geographic location was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients and 27 otolaryngologists participated. Patients selected a median of six terms compared with 10.5 for otolaryngologists (p < .001). Otolaryngologists were more likely to select sensory symptoms (difference: 35.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.2%, 52.4%), throat‐related symptoms (32.4%; 21.2, 43.6%), and chest‐related symptoms (12.4%; 8.8, 15.9). Otolaryngologists and patients were equally likely to consider stomach symptoms as related to reflux (4.0%, −3.7%, 11.7%). No significant differences were identified based on geographic location. CONCLUSION: There are differences between otolaryngologists and their patients in the interpretation of the symptoms of reflux. Patients tended to have a narrower interpretation of reflux with symptoms primarily limited to classic stomach‐related symptoms, while clinicians tended to have a broader definition of reflux that included extra‐esophageal manifestations of disease. This has important counseling implications for the clinician, as patients presenting with reflux symptoms may not comprehend the relationship of those symptoms to reflux disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10167538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101675382023-05-10 Layperson Perception of Reflux‐Related Symptoms Fischer, Jakob L. Tolisano, Anthony M. Navarro, Alvaro I. Trinh, Lily Abuzeid, Waleed M. Humphreys, Ian M. Akbar, Nadeem A. Shah, Sharan Schneider, John S. Riley, Charles A. McCoul, Edward D. OTO Open Original Research OBJECTIVE: To assess for differences of intended meaning in the description of reflux‐related symptoms among otolaryngology patients and clinicians. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional survey‐based study. SETTING: Five tertiary, academic otolaryngology practices. METHODS: Between June 2020 and July 2022, a questionnaire consisting of 20 common descriptors of reflux‐related symptoms within four domains (throat‐, chest‐, stomach‐, and sensory‐related symptoms) was completed by patients. Attending otolaryngologists at five academic medical centers then completed the same survey. The primary outcome was to assess differences in patient and clinician perceptions of reflux‐related symptoms. Differences based on geographic location was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients and 27 otolaryngologists participated. Patients selected a median of six terms compared with 10.5 for otolaryngologists (p < .001). Otolaryngologists were more likely to select sensory symptoms (difference: 35.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.2%, 52.4%), throat‐related symptoms (32.4%; 21.2, 43.6%), and chest‐related symptoms (12.4%; 8.8, 15.9). Otolaryngologists and patients were equally likely to consider stomach symptoms as related to reflux (4.0%, −3.7%, 11.7%). No significant differences were identified based on geographic location. CONCLUSION: There are differences between otolaryngologists and their patients in the interpretation of the symptoms of reflux. Patients tended to have a narrower interpretation of reflux with symptoms primarily limited to classic stomach‐related symptoms, while clinicians tended to have a broader definition of reflux that included extra‐esophageal manifestations of disease. This has important counseling implications for the clinician, as patients presenting with reflux symptoms may not comprehend the relationship of those symptoms to reflux disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10167538/ /pubmed/37181200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.51 Text en © 2023 The Authors. OTO Open published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fischer, Jakob L.
Tolisano, Anthony M.
Navarro, Alvaro I.
Trinh, Lily
Abuzeid, Waleed M.
Humphreys, Ian M.
Akbar, Nadeem A.
Shah, Sharan
Schneider, John S.
Riley, Charles A.
McCoul, Edward D.
Layperson Perception of Reflux‐Related Symptoms
title Layperson Perception of Reflux‐Related Symptoms
title_full Layperson Perception of Reflux‐Related Symptoms
title_fullStr Layperson Perception of Reflux‐Related Symptoms
title_full_unstemmed Layperson Perception of Reflux‐Related Symptoms
title_short Layperson Perception of Reflux‐Related Symptoms
title_sort layperson perception of reflux‐related symptoms
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oto2.51
work_keys_str_mv AT fischerjakobl laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT tolisanoanthonym laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT navarroalvaroi laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT trinhlily laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT abuzeidwaleedm laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT humphreysianm laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT akbarnadeema laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT shahsharan laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT schneiderjohns laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT rileycharlesa laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms
AT mccouledwardd laypersonperceptionofrefluxrelatedsymptoms