Cargando…

Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons

BACKGROUND: The current assessment of recovery after total hip or knee replacement is largely based on the measurement of health outcomes through self-report and clinical observations at follow-up appointments in clinical settings. Home activity-based monitoring may improve assessment of recovery by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grant, Sabrina, Tonkin, Emma, Craddock, Ian, Blom, Ashley, Holmes, Michael, Judge, Andrew, Masullo, Alessandro, Perello Nieto, Miquel, Song, Hao, Whitehouse, Michael, Flach, Peter, Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093626
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36172
_version_ 1785038707676413952
author Grant, Sabrina
Tonkin, Emma
Craddock, Ian
Blom, Ashley
Holmes, Michael
Judge, Andrew
Masullo, Alessandro
Perello Nieto, Miquel
Song, Hao
Whitehouse, Michael
Flach, Peter
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
author_facet Grant, Sabrina
Tonkin, Emma
Craddock, Ian
Blom, Ashley
Holmes, Michael
Judge, Andrew
Masullo, Alessandro
Perello Nieto, Miquel
Song, Hao
Whitehouse, Michael
Flach, Peter
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
author_sort Grant, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current assessment of recovery after total hip or knee replacement is largely based on the measurement of health outcomes through self-report and clinical observations at follow-up appointments in clinical settings. Home activity-based monitoring may improve assessment of recovery by enabling the collection of more holistic information on a continuous basis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to introduce orthopedic surgeons to time-series analyses of patient activity data generated from a platform of sensors deployed in the homes of patients who have undergone primary total hip or knee replacement and understand the potential role of these data in postoperative clinical decision-making. METHODS: Orthopedic surgeons and registrars were recruited through a combination of convenience and snowball sampling. Inclusion criteria were a minimum required experience in total joint replacement surgery specific to the hip or knee or familiarity with postoperative recovery assessment. Exclusion criteria included a lack of specific experience in the field. Of the 9 approached participants, 6 (67%) orthopedic surgeons and 3 (33%) registrars took part in either 1 of 3 focus groups or 1 of 2 interviews. Data were collected using an action-based approach in which stimulus materials (mock data visualizations) provided imaginative and creative interactions with the data. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Each data visualization was presented sequentially followed by a discussion of key illustrative commentary from participants, ending with a summary of key themes emerging across the focus group and interview data set. CONCLUSIONS: The limitations of the evidence are as follows. The data presented are from 1 English hospital. However, all data reflect the views of surgeons following standard national approaches and training. Although convenience sampling was used, participants’ background, skills, and experience were considered heterogeneous. Passively collected home monitoring data offered a real opportunity to more objectively characterize patients’ recovery from surgery. However, orthopedic surgeons highlighted the considerable difficulty in navigating large amounts of complex data within short medical consultations with patients. Orthopedic surgeons thought that a proposed dashboard presenting information and decision support alerts would fit best with existing clinical workflows. From this, the following guidelines for system design were developed: minimize the risk of misinterpreting data, express a level of confidence in the data, support clinicians in developing relevant skills as time-series data are often unfamiliar, and consider the impact of patient engagement with data in the future. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021862
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10167586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101675862023-05-10 Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons Grant, Sabrina Tonkin, Emma Craddock, Ian Blom, Ashley Holmes, Michael Judge, Andrew Masullo, Alessandro Perello Nieto, Miquel Song, Hao Whitehouse, Michael Flach, Peter Gooberman-Hill, Rachael JMIR Perioper Med Original Paper BACKGROUND: The current assessment of recovery after total hip or knee replacement is largely based on the measurement of health outcomes through self-report and clinical observations at follow-up appointments in clinical settings. Home activity-based monitoring may improve assessment of recovery by enabling the collection of more holistic information on a continuous basis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to introduce orthopedic surgeons to time-series analyses of patient activity data generated from a platform of sensors deployed in the homes of patients who have undergone primary total hip or knee replacement and understand the potential role of these data in postoperative clinical decision-making. METHODS: Orthopedic surgeons and registrars were recruited through a combination of convenience and snowball sampling. Inclusion criteria were a minimum required experience in total joint replacement surgery specific to the hip or knee or familiarity with postoperative recovery assessment. Exclusion criteria included a lack of specific experience in the field. Of the 9 approached participants, 6 (67%) orthopedic surgeons and 3 (33%) registrars took part in either 1 of 3 focus groups or 1 of 2 interviews. Data were collected using an action-based approach in which stimulus materials (mock data visualizations) provided imaginative and creative interactions with the data. The data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: Each data visualization was presented sequentially followed by a discussion of key illustrative commentary from participants, ending with a summary of key themes emerging across the focus group and interview data set. CONCLUSIONS: The limitations of the evidence are as follows. The data presented are from 1 English hospital. However, all data reflect the views of surgeons following standard national approaches and training. Although convenience sampling was used, participants’ background, skills, and experience were considered heterogeneous. Passively collected home monitoring data offered a real opportunity to more objectively characterize patients’ recovery from surgery. However, orthopedic surgeons highlighted the considerable difficulty in navigating large amounts of complex data within short medical consultations with patients. Orthopedic surgeons thought that a proposed dashboard presenting information and decision support alerts would fit best with existing clinical workflows. From this, the following guidelines for system design were developed: minimize the risk of misinterpreting data, express a level of confidence in the data, support clinicians in developing relevant skills as time-series data are often unfamiliar, and consider the impact of patient engagement with data in the future. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021862 JMIR Publications 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10167586/ /pubmed/37093626 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36172 Text en ©Sabrina Grant, Emma Tonkin, Ian Craddock, Ashley Blom, Michael Holmes, Andrew Judge, Alessandro Masullo, Miquel Perello Nieto, Hao Song, Michael Whitehouse, Peter Flach, Rachael Gooberman-Hill. Originally published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine (http://periop.jmir.org), 24.04.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Perioperative Medicine, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://periop.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Grant, Sabrina
Tonkin, Emma
Craddock, Ian
Blom, Ashley
Holmes, Michael
Judge, Andrew
Masullo, Alessandro
Perello Nieto, Miquel
Song, Hao
Whitehouse, Michael
Flach, Peter
Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons
title Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons
title_full Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons
title_fullStr Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons
title_short Toward Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Patients Undergoing a Hip or Knee Replacement: Focus Group and Interview Study With Surgeons
title_sort toward enhanced clinical decision support for patients undergoing a hip or knee replacement: focus group and interview study with surgeons
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093626
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36172
work_keys_str_mv AT grantsabrina towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT tonkinemma towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT craddockian towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT blomashley towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT holmesmichael towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT judgeandrew towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT masulloalessandro towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT perellonietomiquel towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT songhao towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT whitehousemichael towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT flachpeter towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons
AT goobermanhillrachael towardenhancedclinicaldecisionsupportforpatientsundergoingahiporkneereplacementfocusgroupandinterviewstudywithsurgeons