Cargando…

Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic continues with new waves that could persist with the arrival of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Therefore, the availability of validated and effective triage tools is the cornerstone for proper clinical management. Thus, this study aimed to assess the validity of the ISARI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alwazzeh, Marwan Jabr, Subbarayalu, Arun Vijay, Abu Ali, Batool Mohammed, alabdulqader, Reema, Alhajri, Mashael, Alwarthan, Sara M., AlShehail, Bashayer M., Raman, Vinoth, Almuhanna, Fahd Abdulaziz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101269
_version_ 1785038740664614912
author Alwazzeh, Marwan Jabr
Subbarayalu, Arun Vijay
Abu Ali, Batool Mohammed
alabdulqader, Reema
Alhajri, Mashael
Alwarthan, Sara M.
AlShehail, Bashayer M.
Raman, Vinoth
Almuhanna, Fahd Abdulaziz
author_facet Alwazzeh, Marwan Jabr
Subbarayalu, Arun Vijay
Abu Ali, Batool Mohammed
alabdulqader, Reema
Alhajri, Mashael
Alwarthan, Sara M.
AlShehail, Bashayer M.
Raman, Vinoth
Almuhanna, Fahd Abdulaziz
author_sort Alwazzeh, Marwan Jabr
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic continues with new waves that could persist with the arrival of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Therefore, the availability of validated and effective triage tools is the cornerstone for proper clinical management. Thus, this study aimed to assess the validity of the ISARIC-4C score as a triage tool for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia and to compare its performance with the CURB-65 score. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted between March 2020 and May 2021 at KFHU, Saudi Arabia, using 542 confirmed COVID-19 patient data on the variables relevant to the application of the ISARIC-4C mortality score and the CURB-65 score. Chi-square and t-tests were employed to study the significance of the CURB-65 score and the ISARIC-4C score variables considering the ICU requirements and the mortality of COVID-19 hospitalized patients. In addition, logistic regression was used to predict the variables related to COVID-19 mortality. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of both scores was validated by calculating sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Youden's J indices (YJI). RESULTS: ROC analysis showed an AUC value of 0.834 [95% CI; 0.800–0.865]) for the CURB-65 score and 0.809 [95% CI; 0.773–0.841]) for the ISARIC-4C score. The sensitivity for CURB-65 and ISARIC-4C is 75% and 85.71%, respectively, while the specificity was 82.31% and 62.66%, respectively. The difference between AUCs was 0.025 (95% [CI; −0.0203-0.0704], p = 0.2795). CONCLUSION: Study results support external validation of the ISARIC-4C score in predicting the mortality risk of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia. In addition, the CURB-65 and ISARIC-4C scores showed comparable performance with good consistent discrimination and are suitable for clinical utility as triage tools for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10167802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101678022023-05-10 Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia Alwazzeh, Marwan Jabr Subbarayalu, Arun Vijay Abu Ali, Batool Mohammed alabdulqader, Reema Alhajri, Mashael Alwarthan, Sara M. AlShehail, Bashayer M. Raman, Vinoth Almuhanna, Fahd Abdulaziz Inform Med Unlocked Article BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic continues with new waves that could persist with the arrival of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Therefore, the availability of validated and effective triage tools is the cornerstone for proper clinical management. Thus, this study aimed to assess the validity of the ISARIC-4C score as a triage tool for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia and to compare its performance with the CURB-65 score. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted between March 2020 and May 2021 at KFHU, Saudi Arabia, using 542 confirmed COVID-19 patient data on the variables relevant to the application of the ISARIC-4C mortality score and the CURB-65 score. Chi-square and t-tests were employed to study the significance of the CURB-65 score and the ISARIC-4C score variables considering the ICU requirements and the mortality of COVID-19 hospitalized patients. In addition, logistic regression was used to predict the variables related to COVID-19 mortality. In addition, the diagnostic accuracy of both scores was validated by calculating sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Youden's J indices (YJI). RESULTS: ROC analysis showed an AUC value of 0.834 [95% CI; 0.800–0.865]) for the CURB-65 score and 0.809 [95% CI; 0.773–0.841]) for the ISARIC-4C score. The sensitivity for CURB-65 and ISARIC-4C is 75% and 85.71%, respectively, while the specificity was 82.31% and 62.66%, respectively. The difference between AUCs was 0.025 (95% [CI; −0.0203-0.0704], p = 0.2795). CONCLUSION: Study results support external validation of the ISARIC-4C score in predicting the mortality risk of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia. In addition, the CURB-65 and ISARIC-4C scores showed comparable performance with good consistent discrimination and are suitable for clinical utility as triage tools for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10167802/ /pubmed/37193544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101269 Text en © 2023 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Alwazzeh, Marwan Jabr
Subbarayalu, Arun Vijay
Abu Ali, Batool Mohammed
alabdulqader, Reema
Alhajri, Mashael
Alwarthan, Sara M.
AlShehail, Bashayer M.
Raman, Vinoth
Almuhanna, Fahd Abdulaziz
Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia
title Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia
title_full Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia
title_short Performance of CURB-65 and ISARIC 4C mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in Saudi Arabia
title_sort performance of curb-65 and isaric 4c mortality scores for hospitalized patients with confirmed covid-19 infection in saudi arabia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37193544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2023.101269
work_keys_str_mv AT alwazzehmarwanjabr performanceofcurb65andisaric4cmortalityscoresforhospitalizedpatientswithconfirmedcovid19infectioninsaudiarabia
AT subbarayaluarunvijay performanceofcurb65andisaric4cmortalityscoresforhospitalizedpatientswithconfirmedcovid19infectioninsaudiarabia
AT abualibatoolmohammed performanceofcurb65andisaric4cmortalityscoresforhospitalizedpatientswithconfirmedcovid19infectioninsaudiarabia
AT alabdulqaderreema performanceofcurb65andisaric4cmortalityscoresforhospitalizedpatientswithconfirmedcovid19infectioninsaudiarabia
AT alhajrimashael performanceofcurb65andisaric4cmortalityscoresforhospitalizedpatientswithconfirmedcovid19infectioninsaudiarabia
AT alwarthansaram performanceofcurb65andisaric4cmortalityscoresforhospitalizedpatientswithconfirmedcovid19infectioninsaudiarabia
AT alshehailbashayerm performanceofcurb65andisaric4cmortalityscoresforhospitalizedpatientswithconfirmedcovid19infectioninsaudiarabia
AT ramanvinoth performanceofcurb65andisaric4cmortalityscoresforhospitalizedpatientswithconfirmedcovid19infectioninsaudiarabia
AT almuhannafahdabdulaziz performanceofcurb65andisaric4cmortalityscoresforhospitalizedpatientswithconfirmedcovid19infectioninsaudiarabia