Cargando…
Performance of qSOFA Score as a Screening Tool for Sepsis in the Emergency Department
INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality, and various scoring systems have been developed for its early identification and treatment. The objective was to test the ability of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score to identify sepsis and predict sepsis-related mortality...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181737 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_99_22 |
_version_ | 1785038745613893632 |
---|---|
author | Tiwari, Atul Kumar Jamshed, Nayer Sahu, Ankit Kumar Kumar, Akshay Aggarwal, Praveen Bhoi, Sanjeev Mathew, Roshan Ekka, Meera |
author_facet | Tiwari, Atul Kumar Jamshed, Nayer Sahu, Ankit Kumar Kumar, Akshay Aggarwal, Praveen Bhoi, Sanjeev Mathew, Roshan Ekka, Meera |
author_sort | Tiwari, Atul Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality, and various scoring systems have been developed for its early identification and treatment. The objective was to test the ability of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score to identify sepsis and predict sepsis-related mortality in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study from July 2018 to April 2020. Consecutive patients with age ≥18 years who presented to the ED with a clinical suspicion of infection were included. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and odds ratio (OR) for sepsis related mortality on day 7 and 28 were measured. RESULTS: A total of 1200 patients were recruited; of which 48 patients were excluded and 17 patients were lost to follow-up. 54 (45.4%) of 119 patients with positive qSOFA (qSOFA >2) died at 7 days and 76 (63.9%) died at 28 days. A total of 103 (10.1%) of 1016 patients with negative qSOFA (qSOFA score <2) died at 7 days and 207 (20.4%) died at 28 days. Patients with positive qSOFA score were at higher odds of dying at 7 days (OR: 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1–5.2, P < 0.001) and 28 days (OR: 6.9, 95% CI: 4.6–10.3, P < 0.001). The PPV and NPV with positive qSOFA score to predict 7- and 28-day mortality were 45.4%, 89.9% and 63.9%, 79.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The qSOFA score can be used as a risk stratification tool in a resource-limited setting to identify infected patients at an increased risk of death. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10167823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101678232023-05-10 Performance of qSOFA Score as a Screening Tool for Sepsis in the Emergency Department Tiwari, Atul Kumar Jamshed, Nayer Sahu, Ankit Kumar Kumar, Akshay Aggarwal, Praveen Bhoi, Sanjeev Mathew, Roshan Ekka, Meera J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article INTRODUCTION: Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality, and various scoring systems have been developed for its early identification and treatment. The objective was to test the ability of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score to identify sepsis and predict sepsis-related mortality in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study from July 2018 to April 2020. Consecutive patients with age ≥18 years who presented to the ED with a clinical suspicion of infection were included. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), and odds ratio (OR) for sepsis related mortality on day 7 and 28 were measured. RESULTS: A total of 1200 patients were recruited; of which 48 patients were excluded and 17 patients were lost to follow-up. 54 (45.4%) of 119 patients with positive qSOFA (qSOFA >2) died at 7 days and 76 (63.9%) died at 28 days. A total of 103 (10.1%) of 1016 patients with negative qSOFA (qSOFA score <2) died at 7 days and 207 (20.4%) died at 28 days. Patients with positive qSOFA score were at higher odds of dying at 7 days (OR: 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1–5.2, P < 0.001) and 28 days (OR: 6.9, 95% CI: 4.6–10.3, P < 0.001). The PPV and NPV with positive qSOFA score to predict 7- and 28-day mortality were 45.4%, 89.9% and 63.9%, 79.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The qSOFA score can be used as a risk stratification tool in a resource-limited setting to identify infected patients at an increased risk of death. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10167823/ /pubmed/37181737 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_99_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tiwari, Atul Kumar Jamshed, Nayer Sahu, Ankit Kumar Kumar, Akshay Aggarwal, Praveen Bhoi, Sanjeev Mathew, Roshan Ekka, Meera Performance of qSOFA Score as a Screening Tool for Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title | Performance of qSOFA Score as a Screening Tool for Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_full | Performance of qSOFA Score as a Screening Tool for Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_fullStr | Performance of qSOFA Score as a Screening Tool for Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of qSOFA Score as a Screening Tool for Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_short | Performance of qSOFA Score as a Screening Tool for Sepsis in the Emergency Department |
title_sort | performance of qsofa score as a screening tool for sepsis in the emergency department |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181737 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_99_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tiwariatulkumar performanceofqsofascoreasascreeningtoolforsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT jamshednayer performanceofqsofascoreasascreeningtoolforsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT sahuankitkumar performanceofqsofascoreasascreeningtoolforsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT kumarakshay performanceofqsofascoreasascreeningtoolforsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT aggarwalpraveen performanceofqsofascoreasascreeningtoolforsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT bhoisanjeev performanceofqsofascoreasascreeningtoolforsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT mathewroshan performanceofqsofascoreasascreeningtoolforsepsisintheemergencydepartment AT ekkameera performanceofqsofascoreasascreeningtoolforsepsisintheemergencydepartment |