Cargando…

Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics

Most of our insights on whole‐plant transpiration (E) are based on leaf‐chamber measurements using water vapor porometers, IRGAs, or flux measurements. Gravimetric methods are integrative, accurate, and a clear differentiation between evaporation and E can be made. Water vapor pressure deficit (VPD)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pieters, Alejandro, Giese, Marcus, Schmierer, Marc, Johnson, Kristian, Asch, Folkard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10094
_version_ 1785038781565370368
author Pieters, Alejandro
Giese, Marcus
Schmierer, Marc
Johnson, Kristian
Asch, Folkard
author_facet Pieters, Alejandro
Giese, Marcus
Schmierer, Marc
Johnson, Kristian
Asch, Folkard
author_sort Pieters, Alejandro
collection PubMed
description Most of our insights on whole‐plant transpiration (E) are based on leaf‐chamber measurements using water vapor porometers, IRGAs, or flux measurements. Gravimetric methods are integrative, accurate, and a clear differentiation between evaporation and E can be made. Water vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is the driving force for E but assessing its impact has been evasive, due to confounding effects of other climate drivers. We developed a chamber‐based gravimetric method, in which whole plant response of E to VPD could be assessed, while keeping other environmental parameters at predetermined values. Stable VPD values (0.5–3.7 kPa) were attained within 5 min after changing flow settings and maintained for at least 45 min. Species differing in life form and photosynthetic metabolism were used. Typical runs covering the range of VPDs lasted up to 4 h, preventing acclimation responses or soilborne water deficit. Species‐specific responses of E to VPD could be identified, as well as differences in leaf conductance. The combined gravimetric‐chamber‐based system presented overcomes several limitations of previous gravimetric set ups in terms of replicability, time, and elucidation of the impact of specific environmental drivers on E, filling a methodological gap and widening our phenotyping capabilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10168032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101680322023-06-06 Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics Pieters, Alejandro Giese, Marcus Schmierer, Marc Johnson, Kristian Asch, Folkard Plant Environ Interact Research Articles Most of our insights on whole‐plant transpiration (E) are based on leaf‐chamber measurements using water vapor porometers, IRGAs, or flux measurements. Gravimetric methods are integrative, accurate, and a clear differentiation between evaporation and E can be made. Water vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is the driving force for E but assessing its impact has been evasive, due to confounding effects of other climate drivers. We developed a chamber‐based gravimetric method, in which whole plant response of E to VPD could be assessed, while keeping other environmental parameters at predetermined values. Stable VPD values (0.5–3.7 kPa) were attained within 5 min after changing flow settings and maintained for at least 45 min. Species differing in life form and photosynthetic metabolism were used. Typical runs covering the range of VPDs lasted up to 4 h, preventing acclimation responses or soilborne water deficit. Species‐specific responses of E to VPD could be identified, as well as differences in leaf conductance. The combined gravimetric‐chamber‐based system presented overcomes several limitations of previous gravimetric set ups in terms of replicability, time, and elucidation of the impact of specific environmental drivers on E, filling a methodological gap and widening our phenotyping capabilities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10168032/ /pubmed/37284431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10094 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Plant‐Environment Interactions published by New Phytologist Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Pieters, Alejandro
Giese, Marcus
Schmierer, Marc
Johnson, Kristian
Asch, Folkard
Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_full Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_fullStr Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_short Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_sort chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10094
work_keys_str_mv AT pietersalejandro chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics
AT giesemarcus chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics
AT schmierermarc chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics
AT johnsonkristian chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics
AT aschfolkard chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics