Cargando…
Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15
The prediction of RNA three-dimensional structures remains an unsolved problem. Here, we report assessments of RNA structure predictions in CASP15, the first CASP exercise that involved RNA structure modeling. Forty two predictor groups submitted models for at least one of twelve RNA-containing targ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37162955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.25.538330 |
_version_ | 1785038851472883712 |
---|---|
author | Das, Rhiju Kretsch, Rachael C. Simpkin, Adam J. Mulvaney, Thomas Pham, Phillip Rangan, Ramya Bu, Fan Keegan, Ronan M. Topf, Maya Rigden, Daniel J. Miao, Zhichao Westhof, Eric |
author_facet | Das, Rhiju Kretsch, Rachael C. Simpkin, Adam J. Mulvaney, Thomas Pham, Phillip Rangan, Ramya Bu, Fan Keegan, Ronan M. Topf, Maya Rigden, Daniel J. Miao, Zhichao Westhof, Eric |
author_sort | Das, Rhiju |
collection | PubMed |
description | The prediction of RNA three-dimensional structures remains an unsolved problem. Here, we report assessments of RNA structure predictions in CASP15, the first CASP exercise that involved RNA structure modeling. Forty two predictor groups submitted models for at least one of twelve RNA-containing targets. These models were evaluated by the RNA-Puzzles organizers and, separately, by a CASP-recruited team using metrics (GDT, lDDT) and approaches (Z-score rankings) initially developed for assessment of proteins and generalized here for RNA assessment. The two assessments independently ranked the same predictor groups as first (AIchemy_RNA2), second (Chen), and third (RNAPolis and GeneSilico, tied); predictions from deep learning approaches were significantly worse than these top ranked groups, which did not use deep learning. Further analyses based on direct comparison of predicted models to cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps and X-ray diffraction data support these rankings. With the exception of two RNA-protein complexes, models submitted by CASP15 groups correctly predicted the global fold of the RNA targets. Comparisons of CASP15 submissions to designed RNA nanostructures as well as molecular replacement trials highlight the potential utility of current RNA modeling approaches for RNA nanotechnology and structural biology, respectively. Nevertheless, challenges remain in modeling fine details such as non-canonical pairs, in ranking among submitted models, and in prediction of multiple structures resolved by cryo-EM or crystallography. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10168427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101684272023-05-10 Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15 Das, Rhiju Kretsch, Rachael C. Simpkin, Adam J. Mulvaney, Thomas Pham, Phillip Rangan, Ramya Bu, Fan Keegan, Ronan M. Topf, Maya Rigden, Daniel J. Miao, Zhichao Westhof, Eric bioRxiv Article The prediction of RNA three-dimensional structures remains an unsolved problem. Here, we report assessments of RNA structure predictions in CASP15, the first CASP exercise that involved RNA structure modeling. Forty two predictor groups submitted models for at least one of twelve RNA-containing targets. These models were evaluated by the RNA-Puzzles organizers and, separately, by a CASP-recruited team using metrics (GDT, lDDT) and approaches (Z-score rankings) initially developed for assessment of proteins and generalized here for RNA assessment. The two assessments independently ranked the same predictor groups as first (AIchemy_RNA2), second (Chen), and third (RNAPolis and GeneSilico, tied); predictions from deep learning approaches were significantly worse than these top ranked groups, which did not use deep learning. Further analyses based on direct comparison of predicted models to cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps and X-ray diffraction data support these rankings. With the exception of two RNA-protein complexes, models submitted by CASP15 groups correctly predicted the global fold of the RNA targets. Comparisons of CASP15 submissions to designed RNA nanostructures as well as molecular replacement trials highlight the potential utility of current RNA modeling approaches for RNA nanotechnology and structural biology, respectively. Nevertheless, challenges remain in modeling fine details such as non-canonical pairs, in ranking among submitted models, and in prediction of multiple structures resolved by cryo-EM or crystallography. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10168427/ /pubmed/37162955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.25.538330 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Article Das, Rhiju Kretsch, Rachael C. Simpkin, Adam J. Mulvaney, Thomas Pham, Phillip Rangan, Ramya Bu, Fan Keegan, Ronan M. Topf, Maya Rigden, Daniel J. Miao, Zhichao Westhof, Eric Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15 |
title | Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15 |
title_full | Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15 |
title_fullStr | Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15 |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15 |
title_short | Assessment of three-dimensional RNA structure prediction in CASP15 |
title_sort | assessment of three-dimensional rna structure prediction in casp15 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37162955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.25.538330 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasrhiju assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT kretschrachaelc assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT simpkinadamj assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT mulvaneythomas assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT phamphillip assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT ranganramya assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT bufan assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT keeganronanm assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT topfmaya assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT rigdendanielj assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT miaozhichao assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 AT westhoferic assessmentofthreedimensionalrnastructurepredictionincasp15 |