Cargando…
A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery
Colorectal surgery is a treatment for colorectal lesions. Technological advancements have given the rise to robotic colorectal surgery, a procedure that limits excessive blood loss via 3D pin-point precision capabilities during surgeries. The aim of this study is to review robotic surgery in colorec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10169093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37182014 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37337 |
_version_ | 1785038979332046848 |
---|---|
author | Ravendran, Kapilraj Abiola, Emmanuel Balagumar, Kowthaman Raja, Ahsan Z Flaih, Mohammed Vaja, Sonny P Muhidin, Alhad O Madouros, Nikolaos |
author_facet | Ravendran, Kapilraj Abiola, Emmanuel Balagumar, Kowthaman Raja, Ahsan Z Flaih, Mohammed Vaja, Sonny P Muhidin, Alhad O Madouros, Nikolaos |
author_sort | Ravendran, Kapilraj |
collection | PubMed |
description | Colorectal surgery is a treatment for colorectal lesions. Technological advancements have given the rise to robotic colorectal surgery, a procedure that limits excessive blood loss via 3D pin-point precision capabilities during surgeries. The aim of this study is to review robotic surgery in colorectal treatment procedures in order to dictate its ultimate merits. This is a literature review utilising PubMed and Google Scholar; it only includes case studies and case reviews related to robotic colorectal surgeries. Literature reviews are excluded. We incorporated abstracts from all articles and full publications were examined to compare the benefits of robotic surgery in colorectal treatments. The number of articles reviewed was 41 literature spanning from 2003 to 2022. We found that robotic surgeries yielded finer marginal resections, greater amounts of lymph node resections and earlier recovery of bowel functions. The patients also spent less time in hospital after surgery. The obstacles on the other hand are it costs longer operative hours and further training, which is expensive. Studies show robotic approach is a choice for treating rectal cancer. However further studies would be needed to conclude the best approach. This is especially true with patients treated for anterior colorectal resections. Based on the evidence it's safe to say that the upsides outweigh the downsides, but advancements and further research in robotic colorectal surgeries are still necessary to reduce operative hours and cost. Surgical societies should also take the initiative and set up effective training programmes for colorectal robotic surgeries, as trained physicians result in better treatment outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10169093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101690932023-05-10 A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery Ravendran, Kapilraj Abiola, Emmanuel Balagumar, Kowthaman Raja, Ahsan Z Flaih, Mohammed Vaja, Sonny P Muhidin, Alhad O Madouros, Nikolaos Cureus General Surgery Colorectal surgery is a treatment for colorectal lesions. Technological advancements have given the rise to robotic colorectal surgery, a procedure that limits excessive blood loss via 3D pin-point precision capabilities during surgeries. The aim of this study is to review robotic surgery in colorectal treatment procedures in order to dictate its ultimate merits. This is a literature review utilising PubMed and Google Scholar; it only includes case studies and case reviews related to robotic colorectal surgeries. Literature reviews are excluded. We incorporated abstracts from all articles and full publications were examined to compare the benefits of robotic surgery in colorectal treatments. The number of articles reviewed was 41 literature spanning from 2003 to 2022. We found that robotic surgeries yielded finer marginal resections, greater amounts of lymph node resections and earlier recovery of bowel functions. The patients also spent less time in hospital after surgery. The obstacles on the other hand are it costs longer operative hours and further training, which is expensive. Studies show robotic approach is a choice for treating rectal cancer. However further studies would be needed to conclude the best approach. This is especially true with patients treated for anterior colorectal resections. Based on the evidence it's safe to say that the upsides outweigh the downsides, but advancements and further research in robotic colorectal surgeries are still necessary to reduce operative hours and cost. Surgical societies should also take the initiative and set up effective training programmes for colorectal robotic surgeries, as trained physicians result in better treatment outcomes. Cureus 2023-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10169093/ /pubmed/37182014 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37337 Text en Copyright © 2023, Ravendran et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | General Surgery Ravendran, Kapilraj Abiola, Emmanuel Balagumar, Kowthaman Raja, Ahsan Z Flaih, Mohammed Vaja, Sonny P Muhidin, Alhad O Madouros, Nikolaos A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery |
title | A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery |
title_full | A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery |
title_fullStr | A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery |
title_short | A Review of Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery |
title_sort | review of robotic surgery in colorectal surgery |
topic | General Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10169093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37182014 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ravendrankapilraj areviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT abiolaemmanuel areviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT balagumarkowthaman areviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT rajaahsanz areviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT flaihmohammed areviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT vajasonnyp areviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT muhidinalhado areviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT madourosnikolaos areviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT ravendrankapilraj reviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT abiolaemmanuel reviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT balagumarkowthaman reviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT rajaahsanz reviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT flaihmohammed reviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT vajasonnyp reviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT muhidinalhado reviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery AT madourosnikolaos reviewofroboticsurgeryincolorectalsurgery |