Cargando…

Logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT

BACKGROUND: Biomedical ontologies are representations of biomedical knowledge that provide terms with precisely defined meanings. They play a vital role in facilitating biomedical research in a cross-disciplinary manner. Quality issues of biomedical ontologies will hinder their effective usage. One...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Xubing, Abeysinghe, Rashmie, Roberts, Kirk, Cui, Licong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10169302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02183-7
_version_ 1785039026548375552
author Hao, Xubing
Abeysinghe, Rashmie
Roberts, Kirk
Cui, Licong
author_facet Hao, Xubing
Abeysinghe, Rashmie
Roberts, Kirk
Cui, Licong
author_sort Hao, Xubing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biomedical ontologies are representations of biomedical knowledge that provide terms with precisely defined meanings. They play a vital role in facilitating biomedical research in a cross-disciplinary manner. Quality issues of biomedical ontologies will hinder their effective usage. One such quality issue is missing concepts. In this study, we introduce a logical definition-based approach to identify potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT. A unique contribution of our approach is that it is capable of obtaining both logical definitions and fully specified names for potential missing concepts. METHOD: The logical definitions of unrelated pairs of fully defined concepts in non-lattice subgraphs that indicate quality issues are intersected to generate the logical definitions of potential missing concepts. A text summarization model (called PEGASUS) is fine-tuned to predict the fully specified names of the potential missing concepts from their generated logical definitions. Furthermore, the identified potential missing concepts are validated using external resources including the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), biomedical literature in PubMed, and a newer version of SNOMED CT. RESULTS: From the March 2021 US Edition of SNOMED CT, we obtained a total of 30,313 unique logical definitions for potential missing concepts through the intersecting process. We fine-tuned a PEGASUS summarization model with 289,169 training instances and tested it on 36,146 instances. The model achieved 72.83 of ROUGE-1, 51.06 of ROUGE-2, and 71.76 of ROUGE-L on the test dataset. The model correctly predicted 11,549 out of 36,146 fully specified names in the test dataset. Applying the fine-tuned model on the 30,313 unique logical definitions, 23,031 total potential missing concepts were identified. Out of these, a total of 2,312 (10.04%) were automatically validated by either of the three resources. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that our logical definition-based approach for identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT is encouraging. Nevertheless, there is still room for improving the performance of naming concepts based on logical definitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10169302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101693022023-05-11 Logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT Hao, Xubing Abeysinghe, Rashmie Roberts, Kirk Cui, Licong BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Biomedical ontologies are representations of biomedical knowledge that provide terms with precisely defined meanings. They play a vital role in facilitating biomedical research in a cross-disciplinary manner. Quality issues of biomedical ontologies will hinder their effective usage. One such quality issue is missing concepts. In this study, we introduce a logical definition-based approach to identify potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT. A unique contribution of our approach is that it is capable of obtaining both logical definitions and fully specified names for potential missing concepts. METHOD: The logical definitions of unrelated pairs of fully defined concepts in non-lattice subgraphs that indicate quality issues are intersected to generate the logical definitions of potential missing concepts. A text summarization model (called PEGASUS) is fine-tuned to predict the fully specified names of the potential missing concepts from their generated logical definitions. Furthermore, the identified potential missing concepts are validated using external resources including the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), biomedical literature in PubMed, and a newer version of SNOMED CT. RESULTS: From the March 2021 US Edition of SNOMED CT, we obtained a total of 30,313 unique logical definitions for potential missing concepts through the intersecting process. We fine-tuned a PEGASUS summarization model with 289,169 training instances and tested it on 36,146 instances. The model achieved 72.83 of ROUGE-1, 51.06 of ROUGE-2, and 71.76 of ROUGE-L on the test dataset. The model correctly predicted 11,549 out of 36,146 fully specified names in the test dataset. Applying the fine-tuned model on the 30,313 unique logical definitions, 23,031 total potential missing concepts were identified. Out of these, a total of 2,312 (10.04%) were automatically validated by either of the three resources. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that our logical definition-based approach for identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT is encouraging. Nevertheless, there is still room for improving the performance of naming concepts based on logical definitions. BioMed Central 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10169302/ /pubmed/37161566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02183-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hao, Xubing
Abeysinghe, Rashmie
Roberts, Kirk
Cui, Licong
Logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT
title Logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT
title_full Logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT
title_fullStr Logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT
title_full_unstemmed Logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT
title_short Logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in SNOMED CT
title_sort logical definition-based identification of potential missing concepts in snomed ct
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10169302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02183-7
work_keys_str_mv AT haoxubing logicaldefinitionbasedidentificationofpotentialmissingconceptsinsnomedct
AT abeysingherashmie logicaldefinitionbasedidentificationofpotentialmissingconceptsinsnomedct
AT robertskirk logicaldefinitionbasedidentificationofpotentialmissingconceptsinsnomedct
AT cuilicong logicaldefinitionbasedidentificationofpotentialmissingconceptsinsnomedct