Cargando…

The prognostic value of intraoperative HRV during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prognostic value of HRV measurements during anesthesia for postoperative clinical outcomes prediction using machine learning models. DATA SOURCES: VitalDB, a comprehensive database of 6388 surgical patients admitted to Seoul National University Hospital. ELIGIBILITY CRITERI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Jiahe, Lu, Yonghao, Xu, Ruikun, Fang, Fang, Hong, Shikai, Huang, Lexin, Xue, Yajun, Fei, Jintao, Zhang, Xuegong, Zhou, Boda, Zhang, Ping, Jiang, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10169477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02118-9
_version_ 1785039049984049152
author Niu, Jiahe
Lu, Yonghao
Xu, Ruikun
Fang, Fang
Hong, Shikai
Huang, Lexin
Xue, Yajun
Fei, Jintao
Zhang, Xuegong
Zhou, Boda
Zhang, Ping
Jiang, Rui
author_facet Niu, Jiahe
Lu, Yonghao
Xu, Ruikun
Fang, Fang
Hong, Shikai
Huang, Lexin
Xue, Yajun
Fei, Jintao
Zhang, Xuegong
Zhou, Boda
Zhang, Ping
Jiang, Rui
author_sort Niu, Jiahe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the prognostic value of HRV measurements during anesthesia for postoperative clinical outcomes prediction using machine learning models. DATA SOURCES: VitalDB, a comprehensive database of 6388 surgical patients admitted to Seoul National University Hospital. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Cases with ECG lead II recording duration of less than one hour were excluded. Cases with more than 20% of missing HRV measurements were also excluded. A total of 5641 cases were eligible for the analyses. METHODS: Six machine learning models including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and an ensemble of the five baseline models were developed to predict postoperative clinical outcomes. The prediction models were trained using only clinical information, and using both clinical information and HRV features, respectively. Feature importance based on the SHAP method was used to assess the contribution of the HRV measurements to the outcome predictions. Subgroup analysis was also performed to evaluate the risk association between postoperative ICU stay and various HRV measurements such as heart rate, low-frequency power (LFP), and short-term fluctuation DFA [Formula: see text] . RESULT: The final cohort included 5641 unique cases, among whom 4678 (83.0%) cases had ages over 40, 2877 (51.0%) were male, 1073 (19.0%) stayed in ICU after surgery, 52 (0.9%) suffered in-hospital death, and 3167(56.1%) had a total length of hospital stay longer than 7 days. In the final test set, the highest AUROC performance with only clinical information was 0.79 for postoperative ICU stay, 0.58 for in-hospital mortality, and 0.76 for the total length of hospital stay prediction. Importantly, using both clinical information and HRV features, the AUROC performance was 0.83, 0.70, and 0.76 for the three clinical outcome predictions, respectively. Subgroup analysis found that patients with an average heart rate higher than 70, low-frequency power (LFP) < 33, and short-term fluctuation DFA [Formula: see text] < 0.95 during anesthesia, had a significantly higher risk of entering the ICU after surgery. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that HRV measurements during anesthesia are feasible and effective for predicting postoperative clinical outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02118-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10169477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101694772023-05-11 The prognostic value of intraoperative HRV during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery Niu, Jiahe Lu, Yonghao Xu, Ruikun Fang, Fang Hong, Shikai Huang, Lexin Xue, Yajun Fei, Jintao Zhang, Xuegong Zhou, Boda Zhang, Ping Jiang, Rui BMC Anesthesiol Research OBJECTIVE: To examine the prognostic value of HRV measurements during anesthesia for postoperative clinical outcomes prediction using machine learning models. DATA SOURCES: VitalDB, a comprehensive database of 6388 surgical patients admitted to Seoul National University Hospital. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Cases with ECG lead II recording duration of less than one hour were excluded. Cases with more than 20% of missing HRV measurements were also excluded. A total of 5641 cases were eligible for the analyses. METHODS: Six machine learning models including Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and an ensemble of the five baseline models were developed to predict postoperative clinical outcomes. The prediction models were trained using only clinical information, and using both clinical information and HRV features, respectively. Feature importance based on the SHAP method was used to assess the contribution of the HRV measurements to the outcome predictions. Subgroup analysis was also performed to evaluate the risk association between postoperative ICU stay and various HRV measurements such as heart rate, low-frequency power (LFP), and short-term fluctuation DFA [Formula: see text] . RESULT: The final cohort included 5641 unique cases, among whom 4678 (83.0%) cases had ages over 40, 2877 (51.0%) were male, 1073 (19.0%) stayed in ICU after surgery, 52 (0.9%) suffered in-hospital death, and 3167(56.1%) had a total length of hospital stay longer than 7 days. In the final test set, the highest AUROC performance with only clinical information was 0.79 for postoperative ICU stay, 0.58 for in-hospital mortality, and 0.76 for the total length of hospital stay prediction. Importantly, using both clinical information and HRV features, the AUROC performance was 0.83, 0.70, and 0.76 for the three clinical outcome predictions, respectively. Subgroup analysis found that patients with an average heart rate higher than 70, low-frequency power (LFP) < 33, and short-term fluctuation DFA [Formula: see text] < 0.95 during anesthesia, had a significantly higher risk of entering the ICU after surgery. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that HRV measurements during anesthesia are feasible and effective for predicting postoperative clinical outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02118-9. BioMed Central 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10169477/ /pubmed/37161402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02118-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Niu, Jiahe
Lu, Yonghao
Xu, Ruikun
Fang, Fang
Hong, Shikai
Huang, Lexin
Xue, Yajun
Fei, Jintao
Zhang, Xuegong
Zhou, Boda
Zhang, Ping
Jiang, Rui
The prognostic value of intraoperative HRV during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery
title The prognostic value of intraoperative HRV during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery
title_full The prognostic value of intraoperative HRV during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery
title_fullStr The prognostic value of intraoperative HRV during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic value of intraoperative HRV during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery
title_short The prognostic value of intraoperative HRV during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery
title_sort prognostic value of intraoperative hrv during anesthesia in patients presenting for non-cardiac surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10169477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02118-9
work_keys_str_mv AT niujiahe theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT luyonghao theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT xuruikun theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT fangfang theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT hongshikai theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT huanglexin theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT xueyajun theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT feijintao theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT zhangxuegong theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT zhouboda theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT zhangping theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT jiangrui theprognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT niujiahe prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT luyonghao prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT xuruikun prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT fangfang prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT hongshikai prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT huanglexin prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT xueyajun prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT feijintao prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT zhangxuegong prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT zhouboda prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT zhangping prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery
AT jiangrui prognosticvalueofintraoperativehrvduringanesthesiainpatientspresentingfornoncardiacsurgery