Cargando…

Multimodal fusion models for pulmonary embolism mortality prediction

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common, life threatening cardiovascular emergency. Risk stratification is one of the core principles of acute PE management and determines the choice of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In routine clinical practice, clinicians rely on the patient’s electronic healt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cahan, Noa, Klang, Eyal, Marom, Edith M., Soffer, Shelly, Barash, Yiftach, Burshtein, Evyatar, Konen, Eli, Greenspan, Hayit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34303-8
_version_ 1785039161047121920
author Cahan, Noa
Klang, Eyal
Marom, Edith M.
Soffer, Shelly
Barash, Yiftach
Burshtein, Evyatar
Konen, Eli
Greenspan, Hayit
author_facet Cahan, Noa
Klang, Eyal
Marom, Edith M.
Soffer, Shelly
Barash, Yiftach
Burshtein, Evyatar
Konen, Eli
Greenspan, Hayit
author_sort Cahan, Noa
collection PubMed
description Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common, life threatening cardiovascular emergency. Risk stratification is one of the core principles of acute PE management and determines the choice of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In routine clinical practice, clinicians rely on the patient’s electronic health record (EHR) to provide a context for their medical imaging interpretation. Most deep learning models for radiology applications only consider pixel-value information without the clinical context. Only a few integrate both clinical and imaging data. In this work, we develop and compare multimodal fusion models that can utilize multimodal data by combining both volumetric pixel data and clinical patient data for automatic risk stratification of PE. Our best performing model is an intermediate fusion model that incorporates both bilinear attention and TabNet, and can be trained in an end-to-end manner. The results show that multimodality boosts performance by up to 14% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 for assessing PE severity, with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 94%, thus pointing to the value of using multimodal data to automatically assess PE severity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10170065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101700652023-05-11 Multimodal fusion models for pulmonary embolism mortality prediction Cahan, Noa Klang, Eyal Marom, Edith M. Soffer, Shelly Barash, Yiftach Burshtein, Evyatar Konen, Eli Greenspan, Hayit Sci Rep Article Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common, life threatening cardiovascular emergency. Risk stratification is one of the core principles of acute PE management and determines the choice of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In routine clinical practice, clinicians rely on the patient’s electronic health record (EHR) to provide a context for their medical imaging interpretation. Most deep learning models for radiology applications only consider pixel-value information without the clinical context. Only a few integrate both clinical and imaging data. In this work, we develop and compare multimodal fusion models that can utilize multimodal data by combining both volumetric pixel data and clinical patient data for automatic risk stratification of PE. Our best performing model is an intermediate fusion model that incorporates both bilinear attention and TabNet, and can be trained in an end-to-end manner. The results show that multimodality boosts performance by up to 14% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96 for assessing PE severity, with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 94%, thus pointing to the value of using multimodal data to automatically assess PE severity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10170065/ /pubmed/37160926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34303-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Cahan, Noa
Klang, Eyal
Marom, Edith M.
Soffer, Shelly
Barash, Yiftach
Burshtein, Evyatar
Konen, Eli
Greenspan, Hayit
Multimodal fusion models for pulmonary embolism mortality prediction
title Multimodal fusion models for pulmonary embolism mortality prediction
title_full Multimodal fusion models for pulmonary embolism mortality prediction
title_fullStr Multimodal fusion models for pulmonary embolism mortality prediction
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal fusion models for pulmonary embolism mortality prediction
title_short Multimodal fusion models for pulmonary embolism mortality prediction
title_sort multimodal fusion models for pulmonary embolism mortality prediction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34303-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cahannoa multimodalfusionmodelsforpulmonaryembolismmortalityprediction
AT klangeyal multimodalfusionmodelsforpulmonaryembolismmortalityprediction
AT maromedithm multimodalfusionmodelsforpulmonaryembolismmortalityprediction
AT soffershelly multimodalfusionmodelsforpulmonaryembolismmortalityprediction
AT barashyiftach multimodalfusionmodelsforpulmonaryembolismmortalityprediction
AT burshteinevyatar multimodalfusionmodelsforpulmonaryembolismmortalityprediction
AT koneneli multimodalfusionmodelsforpulmonaryembolismmortalityprediction
AT greenspanhayit multimodalfusionmodelsforpulmonaryembolismmortalityprediction