Cargando…
HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests
Point of care rapid diagnostic tests (POC-RDT) for Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV), are ideal for screening in non-clinical outreach settings as they can provide immediate results and facilitate diagnosis, allowing high risk population screenin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33925-2 |
_version_ | 1785039166703140864 |
---|---|
author | Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros Valencia, Jorge Rodriguez-Recio, Alvaro Cuevas, Guillermo Garcia-Lugo, Alejandra Manzano, Samuel Rodriguez-Paredes, Vanessa Fernandez, Beatriz Morago, Lucía Casado, Concepción Avellón, Ana Ryan, Pablo |
author_facet | Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros Valencia, Jorge Rodriguez-Recio, Alvaro Cuevas, Guillermo Garcia-Lugo, Alejandra Manzano, Samuel Rodriguez-Paredes, Vanessa Fernandez, Beatriz Morago, Lucía Casado, Concepción Avellón, Ana Ryan, Pablo |
author_sort | Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros |
collection | PubMed |
description | Point of care rapid diagnostic tests (POC-RDT) for Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV), are ideal for screening in non-clinical outreach settings as they can provide immediate results and facilitate diagnosis, allowing high risk population screening. The aim of this study was to compare POC-RDT with laboratory conventional tests. A total of 301 vulnerable evaluable subjects (drug users, migrants and homeless population) were recruited at a mobile screening unit in outreach settings in Madrid. Fingerprick whole blood capillary samples were tested using the SD BIOLINE HCV POC-RDT, Determine HIV Early Detect and Determine HBsAg 2, and the results were assessed against the LIAISON XL HCV, HIV and Murex-HBsAg-Quant, reference assays, respectively. The feasibility and user satisfaction of the POC-RDT were evaluated through a questionnaire. The resolved sensitivity and resolved specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were as follows, respectively: SD-BIOLINE-HCV: 98.8% (95% CI 93.4, 100.0) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.3, 100.0); Determine HIV Early Detect: 100% (95% CI 85.2, 100.0) and 100% (95% CI 98.7, 100); and Determine HBsAg 2: 66.7% (95% CI 9.4, 99.2) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.7, 100.0). As expected, the number of subjects with a confirmed positive result for HBsAg was very low (n = 4). Therefore, the analytical sensitivity has been evaluated in addition: The Determine HBsAg 2 test demonstrated 100% sensitivity for standard concentrations ≥ 0.125 IU/mL. The subject questionnaire yielded positive feedback for most subjects. The POC-RDT fingerprick blood collection method was well received, and the tests demonstrated a comparable clinical performance with conventional tests in outreach settings and vulnerable high-risk populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10170094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101700942023-05-11 HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros Valencia, Jorge Rodriguez-Recio, Alvaro Cuevas, Guillermo Garcia-Lugo, Alejandra Manzano, Samuel Rodriguez-Paredes, Vanessa Fernandez, Beatriz Morago, Lucía Casado, Concepción Avellón, Ana Ryan, Pablo Sci Rep Article Point of care rapid diagnostic tests (POC-RDT) for Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV), are ideal for screening in non-clinical outreach settings as they can provide immediate results and facilitate diagnosis, allowing high risk population screening. The aim of this study was to compare POC-RDT with laboratory conventional tests. A total of 301 vulnerable evaluable subjects (drug users, migrants and homeless population) were recruited at a mobile screening unit in outreach settings in Madrid. Fingerprick whole blood capillary samples were tested using the SD BIOLINE HCV POC-RDT, Determine HIV Early Detect and Determine HBsAg 2, and the results were assessed against the LIAISON XL HCV, HIV and Murex-HBsAg-Quant, reference assays, respectively. The feasibility and user satisfaction of the POC-RDT were evaluated through a questionnaire. The resolved sensitivity and resolved specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were as follows, respectively: SD-BIOLINE-HCV: 98.8% (95% CI 93.4, 100.0) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.3, 100.0); Determine HIV Early Detect: 100% (95% CI 85.2, 100.0) and 100% (95% CI 98.7, 100); and Determine HBsAg 2: 66.7% (95% CI 9.4, 99.2) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.7, 100.0). As expected, the number of subjects with a confirmed positive result for HBsAg was very low (n = 4). Therefore, the analytical sensitivity has been evaluated in addition: The Determine HBsAg 2 test demonstrated 100% sensitivity for standard concentrations ≥ 0.125 IU/mL. The subject questionnaire yielded positive feedback for most subjects. The POC-RDT fingerprick blood collection method was well received, and the tests demonstrated a comparable clinical performance with conventional tests in outreach settings and vulnerable high-risk populations. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10170094/ /pubmed/37160925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33925-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros Valencia, Jorge Rodriguez-Recio, Alvaro Cuevas, Guillermo Garcia-Lugo, Alejandra Manzano, Samuel Rodriguez-Paredes, Vanessa Fernandez, Beatriz Morago, Lucía Casado, Concepción Avellón, Ana Ryan, Pablo HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests |
title | HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests |
title_full | HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests |
title_fullStr | HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests |
title_full_unstemmed | HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests |
title_short | HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests |
title_sort | hcv, hiv and hbv rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33925-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munozchimenomilagros hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT valenciajorge hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT rodriguezrecioalvaro hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT cuevasguillermo hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT garcialugoalejandra hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT manzanosamuel hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT rodriguezparedesvanessa hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT fernandezbeatriz hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT moragolucia hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT casadoconcepcion hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT avellonana hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests AT ryanpablo hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests |