Cargando…

HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests

Point of care rapid diagnostic tests (POC-RDT) for Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV), are ideal for screening in non-clinical outreach settings as they can provide immediate results and facilitate diagnosis, allowing high risk population screenin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros, Valencia, Jorge, Rodriguez-Recio, Alvaro, Cuevas, Guillermo, Garcia-Lugo, Alejandra, Manzano, Samuel, Rodriguez-Paredes, Vanessa, Fernandez, Beatriz, Morago, Lucía, Casado, Concepción, Avellón, Ana, Ryan, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33925-2
_version_ 1785039166703140864
author Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros
Valencia, Jorge
Rodriguez-Recio, Alvaro
Cuevas, Guillermo
Garcia-Lugo, Alejandra
Manzano, Samuel
Rodriguez-Paredes, Vanessa
Fernandez, Beatriz
Morago, Lucía
Casado, Concepción
Avellón, Ana
Ryan, Pablo
author_facet Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros
Valencia, Jorge
Rodriguez-Recio, Alvaro
Cuevas, Guillermo
Garcia-Lugo, Alejandra
Manzano, Samuel
Rodriguez-Paredes, Vanessa
Fernandez, Beatriz
Morago, Lucía
Casado, Concepción
Avellón, Ana
Ryan, Pablo
author_sort Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros
collection PubMed
description Point of care rapid diagnostic tests (POC-RDT) for Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV), are ideal for screening in non-clinical outreach settings as they can provide immediate results and facilitate diagnosis, allowing high risk population screening. The aim of this study was to compare POC-RDT with laboratory conventional tests. A total of 301 vulnerable evaluable subjects (drug users, migrants and homeless population) were recruited at a mobile screening unit in outreach settings in Madrid. Fingerprick whole blood capillary samples were tested using the SD BIOLINE HCV POC-RDT, Determine HIV Early Detect and Determine HBsAg 2, and the results were assessed against the LIAISON XL HCV, HIV and Murex-HBsAg-Quant, reference assays, respectively. The feasibility and user satisfaction of the POC-RDT were evaluated through a questionnaire. The resolved sensitivity and resolved specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were as follows, respectively: SD-BIOLINE-HCV: 98.8% (95% CI 93.4, 100.0) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.3, 100.0); Determine HIV Early Detect: 100% (95% CI 85.2, 100.0) and 100% (95% CI 98.7, 100); and Determine HBsAg 2: 66.7% (95% CI 9.4, 99.2) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.7, 100.0). As expected, the number of subjects with a confirmed positive result for HBsAg was very low (n = 4). Therefore, the analytical sensitivity has been evaluated in addition: The Determine HBsAg 2 test demonstrated 100% sensitivity for standard concentrations ≥ 0.125 IU/mL. The subject questionnaire yielded positive feedback for most subjects. The POC-RDT fingerprick blood collection method was well received, and the tests demonstrated a comparable clinical performance with conventional tests in outreach settings and vulnerable high-risk populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10170094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101700942023-05-11 HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros Valencia, Jorge Rodriguez-Recio, Alvaro Cuevas, Guillermo Garcia-Lugo, Alejandra Manzano, Samuel Rodriguez-Paredes, Vanessa Fernandez, Beatriz Morago, Lucía Casado, Concepción Avellón, Ana Ryan, Pablo Sci Rep Article Point of care rapid diagnostic tests (POC-RDT) for Hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV), are ideal for screening in non-clinical outreach settings as they can provide immediate results and facilitate diagnosis, allowing high risk population screening. The aim of this study was to compare POC-RDT with laboratory conventional tests. A total of 301 vulnerable evaluable subjects (drug users, migrants and homeless population) were recruited at a mobile screening unit in outreach settings in Madrid. Fingerprick whole blood capillary samples were tested using the SD BIOLINE HCV POC-RDT, Determine HIV Early Detect and Determine HBsAg 2, and the results were assessed against the LIAISON XL HCV, HIV and Murex-HBsAg-Quant, reference assays, respectively. The feasibility and user satisfaction of the POC-RDT were evaluated through a questionnaire. The resolved sensitivity and resolved specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were as follows, respectively: SD-BIOLINE-HCV: 98.8% (95% CI 93.4, 100.0) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.3, 100.0); Determine HIV Early Detect: 100% (95% CI 85.2, 100.0) and 100% (95% CI 98.7, 100); and Determine HBsAg 2: 66.7% (95% CI 9.4, 99.2) and 100.0% (95% CI 98.7, 100.0). As expected, the number of subjects with a confirmed positive result for HBsAg was very low (n = 4). Therefore, the analytical sensitivity has been evaluated in addition: The Determine HBsAg 2 test demonstrated 100% sensitivity for standard concentrations ≥ 0.125 IU/mL. The subject questionnaire yielded positive feedback for most subjects. The POC-RDT fingerprick blood collection method was well received, and the tests demonstrated a comparable clinical performance with conventional tests in outreach settings and vulnerable high-risk populations. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10170094/ /pubmed/37160925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33925-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Muñoz-Chimeno, Milagros
Valencia, Jorge
Rodriguez-Recio, Alvaro
Cuevas, Guillermo
Garcia-Lugo, Alejandra
Manzano, Samuel
Rodriguez-Paredes, Vanessa
Fernandez, Beatriz
Morago, Lucía
Casado, Concepción
Avellón, Ana
Ryan, Pablo
HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests
title HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests
title_full HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests
title_fullStr HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests
title_full_unstemmed HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests
title_short HCV, HIV AND HBV rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests
title_sort hcv, hiv and hbv rapid test diagnosis in non-clinical outreach settings can be as accurate as conventional laboratory tests
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33925-2
work_keys_str_mv AT munozchimenomilagros hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT valenciajorge hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT rodriguezrecioalvaro hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT cuevasguillermo hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT garcialugoalejandra hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT manzanosamuel hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT rodriguezparedesvanessa hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT fernandezbeatriz hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT moragolucia hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT casadoconcepcion hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT avellonana hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests
AT ryanpablo hcvhivandhbvrapidtestdiagnosisinnonclinicaloutreachsettingscanbeasaccurateasconventionallaboratorytests