Cargando…
Invincible honor: masculine honor, perceived invulnerability, and risky decision-making
Masculine honor ideology is characterized by the cultivation, maintenance, and defense of reputations for toughness, bravery, and strength. The link between masculine honor endorsement and increased risk-taking – especially an increased tolerance for and even expectation of violence - is well-establ...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04722-x |
_version_ | 1785039176041758720 |
---|---|
author | Pomerantz, Aaron L. Foster, Stephen Bell, Kevin |
author_facet | Pomerantz, Aaron L. Foster, Stephen Bell, Kevin |
author_sort | Pomerantz, Aaron L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Masculine honor ideology is characterized by the cultivation, maintenance, and defense of reputations for toughness, bravery, and strength. The link between masculine honor endorsement and increased risk-taking – especially an increased tolerance for and even expectation of violence - is well-established in the literature. However, little empirical research has examined what factors might explain this relationship. This study investigates perceived invulnerability, the cognitive bias that one is immune to threats, as a mediator in the relationship between masculine honor ideology and risky decision-making. Results show moderate support for this relationship’s existence. These findings elaborate on previous research between honor and specific risky decisions by demonstrating honor to instill cognitive biases in its adherents that make them more tolerant of risk, and thus more likely to decide to engage in risky behaviors. The implications of these findings for interpreting previous research, guiding future research, and pursuing specific educational and policy-based efforts are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10170145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101701452023-05-11 Invincible honor: masculine honor, perceived invulnerability, and risky decision-making Pomerantz, Aaron L. Foster, Stephen Bell, Kevin Curr Psychol Article Masculine honor ideology is characterized by the cultivation, maintenance, and defense of reputations for toughness, bravery, and strength. The link between masculine honor endorsement and increased risk-taking – especially an increased tolerance for and even expectation of violence - is well-established in the literature. However, little empirical research has examined what factors might explain this relationship. This study investigates perceived invulnerability, the cognitive bias that one is immune to threats, as a mediator in the relationship between masculine honor ideology and risky decision-making. Results show moderate support for this relationship’s existence. These findings elaborate on previous research between honor and specific risky decisions by demonstrating honor to instill cognitive biases in its adherents that make them more tolerant of risk, and thus more likely to decide to engage in risky behaviors. The implications of these findings for interpreting previous research, guiding future research, and pursuing specific educational and policy-based efforts are discussed. Springer US 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10170145/ /pubmed/37359611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04722-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Pomerantz, Aaron L. Foster, Stephen Bell, Kevin Invincible honor: masculine honor, perceived invulnerability, and risky decision-making |
title | Invincible honor: masculine honor, perceived invulnerability, and risky decision-making |
title_full | Invincible honor: masculine honor, perceived invulnerability, and risky decision-making |
title_fullStr | Invincible honor: masculine honor, perceived invulnerability, and risky decision-making |
title_full_unstemmed | Invincible honor: masculine honor, perceived invulnerability, and risky decision-making |
title_short | Invincible honor: masculine honor, perceived invulnerability, and risky decision-making |
title_sort | invincible honor: masculine honor, perceived invulnerability, and risky decision-making |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04722-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pomerantzaaronl invinciblehonormasculinehonorperceivedinvulnerabilityandriskydecisionmaking AT fosterstephen invinciblehonormasculinehonorperceivedinvulnerabilityandriskydecisionmaking AT bellkevin invinciblehonormasculinehonorperceivedinvulnerabilityandriskydecisionmaking |