Cargando…
Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Front-of-neck access (FONA) is an emergency procedure used as a last resort to achieve a patent airway in the prehospital environment. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the number and success rate of FONA procedures in the prehospital setting, including c...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.022 |
_version_ | 1785039218179833856 |
---|---|
author | Morton, Sarah Avery, Pascale Kua, Justin O'Meara, Matt |
author_facet | Morton, Sarah Avery, Pascale Kua, Justin O'Meara, Matt |
author_sort | Morton, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Front-of-neck access (FONA) is an emergency procedure used as a last resort to achieve a patent airway in the prehospital environment. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the number and success rate of FONA procedures in the prehospital setting, including changes since 2017, when a surgical technique was outlined as the first-line prehospital method. METHODS: A systematic literature search (PROSPERO CRD42022348975) was performed from inception of databases to July 2022 to identify studies in patients of any age undergoing prehospital FONA, followed by data extraction. Meta-analysis was used to derive pooled success rates. Methodological quality of included studies was interpreted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: From 909 studies, 69 studies were included (33 low quality; 36 very low quality) with 3292 prehospital FONA attempts described (1229 available for analysis). The crude median success rate increased from 99.2% before 2017 to 100.0% after 2017. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled overall FONA success rate of 88.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.0–91.0%). Surgical techniques had the highest success rate at a median of 100.0% (pooled rate=92.0%; 95% CI, 88.0–95.0%) vs 50.0% for needle techniques (pooled rate=52.0%; 95% CI, 28.0–76.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being a relatively rare procedure in the prehospital setting, the success rate for FONA is high. A surgical technique for FONA appears more successful than needle techniques, and supports existing UK prehospital guidelines. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42022348975. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10170392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101703922023-05-11 Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis Morton, Sarah Avery, Pascale Kua, Justin O'Meara, Matt Br J Anaesth Respiration and the Airway BACKGROUND: Front-of-neck access (FONA) is an emergency procedure used as a last resort to achieve a patent airway in the prehospital environment. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the number and success rate of FONA procedures in the prehospital setting, including changes since 2017, when a surgical technique was outlined as the first-line prehospital method. METHODS: A systematic literature search (PROSPERO CRD42022348975) was performed from inception of databases to July 2022 to identify studies in patients of any age undergoing prehospital FONA, followed by data extraction. Meta-analysis was used to derive pooled success rates. Methodological quality of included studies was interpreted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: From 909 studies, 69 studies were included (33 low quality; 36 very low quality) with 3292 prehospital FONA attempts described (1229 available for analysis). The crude median success rate increased from 99.2% before 2017 to 100.0% after 2017. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled overall FONA success rate of 88.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.0–91.0%). Surgical techniques had the highest success rate at a median of 100.0% (pooled rate=92.0%; 95% CI, 88.0–95.0%) vs 50.0% for needle techniques (pooled rate=52.0%; 95% CI, 28.0–76.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being a relatively rare procedure in the prehospital setting, the success rate for FONA is high. A surgical technique for FONA appears more successful than needle techniques, and supports existing UK prehospital guidelines. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42022348975. Elsevier 2023-05 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10170392/ /pubmed/36858888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.022 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Respiration and the Airway Morton, Sarah Avery, Pascale Kua, Justin O'Meara, Matt Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (FONA): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | success rate of prehospital emergency front-of-neck access (fona): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Respiration and the Airway |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mortonsarah successrateofprehospitalemergencyfrontofneckaccessfonaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT averypascale successrateofprehospitalemergencyfrontofneckaccessfonaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kuajustin successrateofprehospitalemergencyfrontofneckaccessfonaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT omearamatt successrateofprehospitalemergencyfrontofneckaccessfonaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |