Cargando…

Workflow assessment of an augmented reality application for planning of perforator flaps in plastic reconstructive surgery: Game or game changer?

OBJECTIVE: In contrast to the rising amount of financial investments for research and development in medical technology worldwide is the lack of usability and clinical readiness of the produced systems. We evaluated an augmented reality (AR) setup under development for preoperative perforator vessel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berger, Matthias Fabian, Winter, Raimund, Tuca, Alexandru-Cristian, Michelitsch, Birgit, Schenkenfelder, Bernhard, Hartmann, Robert, Giretzlehner, Michael, Reishofer, Gernot, Kamolz, Lars-Peter, Lumenta, David Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231173554
_version_ 1785039264446152704
author Berger, Matthias Fabian
Winter, Raimund
Tuca, Alexandru-Cristian
Michelitsch, Birgit
Schenkenfelder, Bernhard
Hartmann, Robert
Giretzlehner, Michael
Reishofer, Gernot
Kamolz, Lars-Peter
Lumenta, David Benjamin
author_facet Berger, Matthias Fabian
Winter, Raimund
Tuca, Alexandru-Cristian
Michelitsch, Birgit
Schenkenfelder, Bernhard
Hartmann, Robert
Giretzlehner, Michael
Reishofer, Gernot
Kamolz, Lars-Peter
Lumenta, David Benjamin
author_sort Berger, Matthias Fabian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In contrast to the rising amount of financial investments for research and development in medical technology worldwide is the lack of usability and clinical readiness of the produced systems. We evaluated an augmented reality (AR) setup under development for preoperative perforator vessel mapping for elective autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: In this grant-supported research pilot, we used magnetic resonance angiography data (MR-A) of the trunk to superimpose the scans on the corresponding patients with hands-free AR goggles to identify regions-of-interest for surgical planning. Perforator location was assessed using MR-A imaging (MR-A projection) and Doppler ultrasound data (3D distance) and confirmed intraoperatively in all cases. We evaluated usability (System Usability Scale, SUS), data transfer load and documented personnel hours for software development, correlation of image data, as well as processing duration to clinical readiness (time from MR-A to AR projections per scan). RESULTS: All perforator locations were confirmed intraoperatively, and we found a strong correlation between MR-A projection and 3D distance measurements (Spearman r = 0.894). The overall usability (SUS) was 67 ± 10 (=moderate to good). The presented setup for AR projections took 173 min to clinical readiness (=availability on AR device per patient). CONCLUSION: In this pilot, we calculated development investments based on project-approved grant-funded personnel hours with a moderate to good usability outcome resulting from some limitations: assessment was based on one-time testing with no previous training, a time lag of AR visualizations on the body and difficulties in spatial AR orientation. The use of AR systems can provide new opportunities for future surgical planning, but has more potential for educational (e.g., patient information) or training purposes of medical under- and postgraduates (spatial recognition of imaging data associated with anatomical structures and operative planning). We expect future usability improvements with refined user interfaces, faster AR hardware and artificial intelligence-enhanced visualization techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10170605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101706052023-05-11 Workflow assessment of an augmented reality application for planning of perforator flaps in plastic reconstructive surgery: Game or game changer? Berger, Matthias Fabian Winter, Raimund Tuca, Alexandru-Cristian Michelitsch, Birgit Schenkenfelder, Bernhard Hartmann, Robert Giretzlehner, Michael Reishofer, Gernot Kamolz, Lars-Peter Lumenta, David Benjamin Digit Health Pilot Study OBJECTIVE: In contrast to the rising amount of financial investments for research and development in medical technology worldwide is the lack of usability and clinical readiness of the produced systems. We evaluated an augmented reality (AR) setup under development for preoperative perforator vessel mapping for elective autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: In this grant-supported research pilot, we used magnetic resonance angiography data (MR-A) of the trunk to superimpose the scans on the corresponding patients with hands-free AR goggles to identify regions-of-interest for surgical planning. Perforator location was assessed using MR-A imaging (MR-A projection) and Doppler ultrasound data (3D distance) and confirmed intraoperatively in all cases. We evaluated usability (System Usability Scale, SUS), data transfer load and documented personnel hours for software development, correlation of image data, as well as processing duration to clinical readiness (time from MR-A to AR projections per scan). RESULTS: All perforator locations were confirmed intraoperatively, and we found a strong correlation between MR-A projection and 3D distance measurements (Spearman r = 0.894). The overall usability (SUS) was 67 ± 10 (=moderate to good). The presented setup for AR projections took 173 min to clinical readiness (=availability on AR device per patient). CONCLUSION: In this pilot, we calculated development investments based on project-approved grant-funded personnel hours with a moderate to good usability outcome resulting from some limitations: assessment was based on one-time testing with no previous training, a time lag of AR visualizations on the body and difficulties in spatial AR orientation. The use of AR systems can provide new opportunities for future surgical planning, but has more potential for educational (e.g., patient information) or training purposes of medical under- and postgraduates (spatial recognition of imaging data associated with anatomical structures and operative planning). We expect future usability improvements with refined user interfaces, faster AR hardware and artificial intelligence-enhanced visualization techniques. SAGE Publications 2023-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10170605/ /pubmed/37179745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231173554 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Pilot Study
Berger, Matthias Fabian
Winter, Raimund
Tuca, Alexandru-Cristian
Michelitsch, Birgit
Schenkenfelder, Bernhard
Hartmann, Robert
Giretzlehner, Michael
Reishofer, Gernot
Kamolz, Lars-Peter
Lumenta, David Benjamin
Workflow assessment of an augmented reality application for planning of perforator flaps in plastic reconstructive surgery: Game or game changer?
title Workflow assessment of an augmented reality application for planning of perforator flaps in plastic reconstructive surgery: Game or game changer?
title_full Workflow assessment of an augmented reality application for planning of perforator flaps in plastic reconstructive surgery: Game or game changer?
title_fullStr Workflow assessment of an augmented reality application for planning of perforator flaps in plastic reconstructive surgery: Game or game changer?
title_full_unstemmed Workflow assessment of an augmented reality application for planning of perforator flaps in plastic reconstructive surgery: Game or game changer?
title_short Workflow assessment of an augmented reality application for planning of perforator flaps in plastic reconstructive surgery: Game or game changer?
title_sort workflow assessment of an augmented reality application for planning of perforator flaps in plastic reconstructive surgery: game or game changer?
topic Pilot Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231173554
work_keys_str_mv AT bergermatthiasfabian workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger
AT winterraimund workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger
AT tucaalexandrucristian workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger
AT michelitschbirgit workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger
AT schenkenfelderbernhard workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger
AT hartmannrobert workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger
AT giretzlehnermichael workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger
AT reishofergernot workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger
AT kamolzlarspeter workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger
AT lumentadavidbenjamin workflowassessmentofanaugmentedrealityapplicationforplanningofperforatorflapsinplasticreconstructivesurgerygameorgamechanger