Cargando…

Analysis of risk factors for duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation

BACKGROUND: Repairing of a duodenal perforation is a well accepted procedure, but clinically, approximately 4% of patients develop duodenal leaks after perforation repair, increasing the risk of death. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 168 patients at our hospital to explore risk factor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jianping, Zhou, Song, Wang, Shaoyi, Xue, Xiaojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02005-7
_version_ 1785039286725246976
author Liu, Jianping
Zhou, Song
Wang, Shaoyi
Xue, Xiaojun
author_facet Liu, Jianping
Zhou, Song
Wang, Shaoyi
Xue, Xiaojun
author_sort Liu, Jianping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repairing of a duodenal perforation is a well accepted procedure, but clinically, approximately 4% of patients develop duodenal leaks after perforation repair, increasing the risk of death. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 168 patients at our hospital to explore risk factors for duodenal leak after perforation repair and developed a nomogram for predicting postoperative duodenal leak. METHODS: This retrospective case–control study totalled 168 patients undergoing repair of a duodenal perforation with omentopexy at the General Surgery Department, Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University, from January 2012 to January 2022. The patients were divided into the non-leak group and the leak group. Risk factors were evaluated by analyzing the patient’s sex, shock, diameter and anatomic position of the ulcer, use of NSAIDS and Glucocorticoid, history of drinking, diabetes, chronic diseases, age, time of onset of symptoms and lab tests. RESULT: One hundred fifty-six patients (92.9%) who did not develop leaks after repair of a duodenal perforation were included in the non-leak group, and 12 (7.1%) developed leaks were included in the leak group. In univariate analysis, there were significant differences between the two groups referring to age, shock, NSAIDs, albumin, and perforation size (P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve for perforation diameter was 0.737, the p-value was 0.006, the optimal cutoff point was 11.5, sensitivity was 58.3%, and specificity was 93.6%, the positive predictive value is 41.1%, and the negative predictive value is 98.0%. In the internal validation of the performance of the nomogram, the C-index and AUC of the model were 0.896(95%CI 0.81–0.98), demonstrating that the nomogram model was well calibrated. CONCLUSION: The study discussed the risk factors for postoperative duodenal leak in patients undergoing repair of a duodenal perforation, and a nomogram was constructed to predict the leak. Future prospective studies with large sample sizes and multiple centres are needed to further elucidate the risk of duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10170746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101707462023-05-11 Analysis of risk factors for duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation Liu, Jianping Zhou, Song Wang, Shaoyi Xue, Xiaojun BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Repairing of a duodenal perforation is a well accepted procedure, but clinically, approximately 4% of patients develop duodenal leaks after perforation repair, increasing the risk of death. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 168 patients at our hospital to explore risk factors for duodenal leak after perforation repair and developed a nomogram for predicting postoperative duodenal leak. METHODS: This retrospective case–control study totalled 168 patients undergoing repair of a duodenal perforation with omentopexy at the General Surgery Department, Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University, from January 2012 to January 2022. The patients were divided into the non-leak group and the leak group. Risk factors were evaluated by analyzing the patient’s sex, shock, diameter and anatomic position of the ulcer, use of NSAIDS and Glucocorticoid, history of drinking, diabetes, chronic diseases, age, time of onset of symptoms and lab tests. RESULT: One hundred fifty-six patients (92.9%) who did not develop leaks after repair of a duodenal perforation were included in the non-leak group, and 12 (7.1%) developed leaks were included in the leak group. In univariate analysis, there were significant differences between the two groups referring to age, shock, NSAIDs, albumin, and perforation size (P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve for perforation diameter was 0.737, the p-value was 0.006, the optimal cutoff point was 11.5, sensitivity was 58.3%, and specificity was 93.6%, the positive predictive value is 41.1%, and the negative predictive value is 98.0%. In the internal validation of the performance of the nomogram, the C-index and AUC of the model were 0.896(95%CI 0.81–0.98), demonstrating that the nomogram model was well calibrated. CONCLUSION: The study discussed the risk factors for postoperative duodenal leak in patients undergoing repair of a duodenal perforation, and a nomogram was constructed to predict the leak. Future prospective studies with large sample sizes and multiple centres are needed to further elucidate the risk of duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation. BioMed Central 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10170746/ /pubmed/37165360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02005-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Jianping
Zhou, Song
Wang, Shaoyi
Xue, Xiaojun
Analysis of risk factors for duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation
title Analysis of risk factors for duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation
title_full Analysis of risk factors for duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation
title_fullStr Analysis of risk factors for duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of risk factors for duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation
title_short Analysis of risk factors for duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation
title_sort analysis of risk factors for duodenal leak after repair of a duodenal perforation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02005-7
work_keys_str_mv AT liujianping analysisofriskfactorsforduodenalleakafterrepairofaduodenalperforation
AT zhousong analysisofriskfactorsforduodenalleakafterrepairofaduodenalperforation
AT wangshaoyi analysisofriskfactorsforduodenalleakafterrepairofaduodenalperforation
AT xuexiaojun analysisofriskfactorsforduodenalleakafterrepairofaduodenalperforation