Cargando…

Are biters sick? Health status of tail biters in comparison to control pigs

BACKGROUND: Tail biting is a multifactorial problem. As the health status is one of the factors commonly linked to tail biting, this study focuses on the health of identified biters. 30 (obsessive) biters are compared to 30 control animals by clinical and pathological examination as well as blood an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Czycholl, I., Büttner, K., Becker, D., Schwennen, C., Baumgärtner, W., Otten, W., Wendt, M., Puff, C., Krieter, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00314-0
_version_ 1785039288623169536
author Czycholl, I.
Büttner, K.
Becker, D.
Schwennen, C.
Baumgärtner, W.
Otten, W.
Wendt, M.
Puff, C.
Krieter, J.
author_facet Czycholl, I.
Büttner, K.
Becker, D.
Schwennen, C.
Baumgärtner, W.
Otten, W.
Wendt, M.
Puff, C.
Krieter, J.
author_sort Czycholl, I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tail biting is a multifactorial problem. As the health status is one of the factors commonly linked to tail biting, this study focuses on the health of identified biters. 30 (obsessive) biters are compared to 30 control animals by clinical and pathological examination as well as blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples. In that way, altogether 174 variables are compared between the groups. Moreover, connections between the variables are analysed. RESULTS: In the clinical examination, 6 biters, but only 2 controls (P = 0.019) were noticeably agitated in the evaluation of general behaviour, while 8 controls were noticeably calmer (2 biters, P = 0.02). Biters had a lower body weight (P = 0.0007) and 13 biters had overlong bristles (4 controls, P = 0.008). In the pathological examination, 5 biters, but none of the controls had a hyperceratosis or inflammation of the pars proventricularis of the stomach (P = 0.018). However, 7 controls and only 3 biters were affected by gut inflammation (P = 0.03). In the blood sample, protein and albumin levels were below normal range for biters (protein: 51.6 g/l, albumin: 25.4 g/l), but not for controls (protein: 53.7 g/l, albumin: 27.4 g/l), (protein: P = 0.05, albumin: P = 0.02). Moreover, 14 biters, but only 8 controls had poikilocytosis (P = 0.05). Although not statistically different between groups, many animals (36/60) were affected by hypoproteinemia and hyponatremia as well as by hypokalemia (53/60) and almost all animals (58/60) had hypomagnesemia. For hypomagnesemia, significant connections with variables linked to tail damage and ear necrosis were detected (r(s)/V/ρ ≥ 0.4, P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that behavioural tests might be helpful in identifying biters. Moreover, cornification and inflammation of the pars proventricularis is linked to becoming a biter. Furthermore, the results highlight the need for appropriate and adjusted nutrient and mineral supply, especially with regard to magnesium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10170755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101707552023-05-11 Are biters sick? Health status of tail biters in comparison to control pigs Czycholl, I. Büttner, K. Becker, D. Schwennen, C. Baumgärtner, W. Otten, W. Wendt, M. Puff, C. Krieter, J. Porcine Health Manag Research BACKGROUND: Tail biting is a multifactorial problem. As the health status is one of the factors commonly linked to tail biting, this study focuses on the health of identified biters. 30 (obsessive) biters are compared to 30 control animals by clinical and pathological examination as well as blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples. In that way, altogether 174 variables are compared between the groups. Moreover, connections between the variables are analysed. RESULTS: In the clinical examination, 6 biters, but only 2 controls (P = 0.019) were noticeably agitated in the evaluation of general behaviour, while 8 controls were noticeably calmer (2 biters, P = 0.02). Biters had a lower body weight (P = 0.0007) and 13 biters had overlong bristles (4 controls, P = 0.008). In the pathological examination, 5 biters, but none of the controls had a hyperceratosis or inflammation of the pars proventricularis of the stomach (P = 0.018). However, 7 controls and only 3 biters were affected by gut inflammation (P = 0.03). In the blood sample, protein and albumin levels were below normal range for biters (protein: 51.6 g/l, albumin: 25.4 g/l), but not for controls (protein: 53.7 g/l, albumin: 27.4 g/l), (protein: P = 0.05, albumin: P = 0.02). Moreover, 14 biters, but only 8 controls had poikilocytosis (P = 0.05). Although not statistically different between groups, many animals (36/60) were affected by hypoproteinemia and hyponatremia as well as by hypokalemia (53/60) and almost all animals (58/60) had hypomagnesemia. For hypomagnesemia, significant connections with variables linked to tail damage and ear necrosis were detected (r(s)/V/ρ ≥ 0.4, P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that behavioural tests might be helpful in identifying biters. Moreover, cornification and inflammation of the pars proventricularis is linked to becoming a biter. Furthermore, the results highlight the need for appropriate and adjusted nutrient and mineral supply, especially with regard to magnesium. BioMed Central 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10170755/ /pubmed/37161469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00314-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Czycholl, I.
Büttner, K.
Becker, D.
Schwennen, C.
Baumgärtner, W.
Otten, W.
Wendt, M.
Puff, C.
Krieter, J.
Are biters sick? Health status of tail biters in comparison to control pigs
title Are biters sick? Health status of tail biters in comparison to control pigs
title_full Are biters sick? Health status of tail biters in comparison to control pigs
title_fullStr Are biters sick? Health status of tail biters in comparison to control pigs
title_full_unstemmed Are biters sick? Health status of tail biters in comparison to control pigs
title_short Are biters sick? Health status of tail biters in comparison to control pigs
title_sort are biters sick? health status of tail biters in comparison to control pigs
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00314-0
work_keys_str_mv AT czycholli arebiterssickhealthstatusoftailbitersincomparisontocontrolpigs
AT buttnerk arebiterssickhealthstatusoftailbitersincomparisontocontrolpigs
AT beckerd arebiterssickhealthstatusoftailbitersincomparisontocontrolpigs
AT schwennenc arebiterssickhealthstatusoftailbitersincomparisontocontrolpigs
AT baumgartnerw arebiterssickhealthstatusoftailbitersincomparisontocontrolpigs
AT ottenw arebiterssickhealthstatusoftailbitersincomparisontocontrolpigs
AT wendtm arebiterssickhealthstatusoftailbitersincomparisontocontrolpigs
AT puffc arebiterssickhealthstatusoftailbitersincomparisontocontrolpigs
AT krieterj arebiterssickhealthstatusoftailbitersincomparisontocontrolpigs