Cargando…

Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors

BACKGROUND: To compare the oncological outcomes of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer (CC) involving different local tumor factors who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT), or radical chemoradiotherapy (R-CT). METHODS: Ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Yanna, Li, Zhiqiang, Kang, Shan, Yang, Yongxiu, Ling, Bin, Wang, Li, Yao, Jilong, Li, Pengfei, Wang, Xueqin, Gong, Shipeng, Fan, Huijian, Kong, Yanxiang, Cao, Yuye, Lang, Jinghe, Liu, Ping, Chen, Chunlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10801-w
_version_ 1785039307204984832
author Ye, Yanna
Li, Zhiqiang
Kang, Shan
Yang, Yongxiu
Ling, Bin
Wang, Li
Yao, Jilong
Li, Pengfei
Wang, Xueqin
Gong, Shipeng
Fan, Huijian
Kong, Yanxiang
Cao, Yuye
Lang, Jinghe
Liu, Ping
Chen, Chunlin
author_facet Ye, Yanna
Li, Zhiqiang
Kang, Shan
Yang, Yongxiu
Ling, Bin
Wang, Li
Yao, Jilong
Li, Pengfei
Wang, Xueqin
Gong, Shipeng
Fan, Huijian
Kong, Yanxiang
Cao, Yuye
Lang, Jinghe
Liu, Ping
Chen, Chunlin
author_sort Ye, Yanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the oncological outcomes of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer (CC) involving different local tumor factors who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT), or radical chemoradiotherapy (R-CT). METHODS: Based on tumor staging, patients with stage IIIC were divided into T1, T2a, T2b, and T3 groups. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 5 years. RESULTS: We included 4,086 patients (1,117, 1,019, 869, and 1,081 in the T1, T2a, T2b, and T3 groups, respectively). In the T1 group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.631, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.150–2.315, P = 0.006) and DFS (HR = 1.665, 95% CI: 1.255–2.182, P < 0.001) than ARH. ARH and NACT were not correlated with OS (P = 0.226 and P = 0.921) or DFS (P = 0.343 and P = 0.535) than R-CT. In the T2a group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in OS (HR = 1.454, 95% CI: 1.057–2.000, P = 0.021) and DFS (HR = 1.529, 95% CI: 1.185–1.974, P = 0.001) than ARH. ARH and NACT were not correlated with OS (P = 0.736 and P = 0.267) or DFS (P = 0.714 and P = 0.087) than R-CT. In the T2b group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in DFS (HR = 1.847, 95% CI: 1.347–2.532, P < 0.001) than R-CT nevertheless was not correlated with OS (P = 0.146); ARH was not correlated with OS (P = 0.056) and DFS (P = 0.676). In the T3 group, the OS rates of ARH (n = 10), NACT (n = 18), and R-CT (n = 1053) were 67.5%, 53.1%, and 64.7% (P = 0.941), and the DFS rates were 68.6%, 45.5%, and 61.1%, respectively (P = 0.761). CONCLUSION: R-CT oncological outcomes were not entirely superior to those of NACT or ARH under different local tumor factors with stage IIIC. NACT is not suitable for stage T1, T2a, and T2b. Nevertheless ARH is potentially applicable to stage T1, T2a, T2b and T3. The results of stage T3 require confirmation through further research due to disparity in case numbers in each subgroup. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-10801-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10170857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101708572023-05-11 Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors Ye, Yanna Li, Zhiqiang Kang, Shan Yang, Yongxiu Ling, Bin Wang, Li Yao, Jilong Li, Pengfei Wang, Xueqin Gong, Shipeng Fan, Huijian Kong, Yanxiang Cao, Yuye Lang, Jinghe Liu, Ping Chen, Chunlin BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: To compare the oncological outcomes of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer (CC) involving different local tumor factors who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT), or radical chemoradiotherapy (R-CT). METHODS: Based on tumor staging, patients with stage IIIC were divided into T1, T2a, T2b, and T3 groups. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 5 years. RESULTS: We included 4,086 patients (1,117, 1,019, 869, and 1,081 in the T1, T2a, T2b, and T3 groups, respectively). In the T1 group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.631, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.150–2.315, P = 0.006) and DFS (HR = 1.665, 95% CI: 1.255–2.182, P < 0.001) than ARH. ARH and NACT were not correlated with OS (P = 0.226 and P = 0.921) or DFS (P = 0.343 and P = 0.535) than R-CT. In the T2a group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in OS (HR = 1.454, 95% CI: 1.057–2.000, P = 0.021) and DFS (HR = 1.529, 95% CI: 1.185–1.974, P = 0.001) than ARH. ARH and NACT were not correlated with OS (P = 0.736 and P = 0.267) or DFS (P = 0.714 and P = 0.087) than R-CT. In the T2b group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in DFS (HR = 1.847, 95% CI: 1.347–2.532, P < 0.001) than R-CT nevertheless was not correlated with OS (P = 0.146); ARH was not correlated with OS (P = 0.056) and DFS (P = 0.676). In the T3 group, the OS rates of ARH (n = 10), NACT (n = 18), and R-CT (n = 1053) were 67.5%, 53.1%, and 64.7% (P = 0.941), and the DFS rates were 68.6%, 45.5%, and 61.1%, respectively (P = 0.761). CONCLUSION: R-CT oncological outcomes were not entirely superior to those of NACT or ARH under different local tumor factors with stage IIIC. NACT is not suitable for stage T1, T2a, and T2b. Nevertheless ARH is potentially applicable to stage T1, T2a, T2b and T3. The results of stage T3 require confirmation through further research due to disparity in case numbers in each subgroup. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-10801-w. BioMed Central 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10170857/ /pubmed/37161372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10801-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ye, Yanna
Li, Zhiqiang
Kang, Shan
Yang, Yongxiu
Ling, Bin
Wang, Li
Yao, Jilong
Li, Pengfei
Wang, Xueqin
Gong, Shipeng
Fan, Huijian
Kong, Yanxiang
Cao, Yuye
Lang, Jinghe
Liu, Ping
Chen, Chunlin
Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
title Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
title_full Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
title_fullStr Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
title_short Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
title_sort treatment of figo 2018 stage iiic cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10801-w
work_keys_str_mv AT yeyanna treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT lizhiqiang treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT kangshan treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT yangyongxiu treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT lingbin treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT wangli treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT yaojilong treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT lipengfei treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT wangxueqin treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT gongshipeng treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT fanhuijian treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT kongyanxiang treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT caoyuye treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT langjinghe treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT liuping treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors
AT chenchunlin treatmentoffigo2018stageiiiccervicalcancerwithdifferentlocaltumorfactors