Cargando…

Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors

BACKGROUND: To compare the oncological outcomes of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer (CC) involving different local tumor factors who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT), or radical chemoradiotherapy (R-CT). METHODS: Ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ye, Yanna, Li, Zhiqiang, Kang, Shan, Yang, Yongxiu, Ling, Bin, Wang, Li, Yao, Jilong, Li, Pengfei, Wang, Xueqin, Gong, Shipeng, Fan, Huijian, Kong, Yanxiang, Cao, Yuye, Lang, Jinghe, Liu, Ping, Chen, Chunlin
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2023
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10801-w

Ejemplares similares

Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14‐year multicenter study
por: Ye, Yanna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
por: Li, Zhiqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Rationality of FIGO 2018 IIIC restaging of cervical cancer according to local tumor size: A cohort study
por: Duan, Hui, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer
por: Long, Xingtao, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review
por: Qin, Fengying, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System
por: Liu, Xiaoliang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Parametrial involvement and decreased survival of women with FIGO stage IIIC1 cervical cancer
por: Chang, Hong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018)
por: Chen, Xiaolin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for FIGO2018 Stage IIIC1 Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study
por: Kagabu, Masahiro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with FIGO IIIC1 cervical cancer: efficacy, toxicity and prognosis
por: Meng, Qingyu, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study
por: Li, Pengfei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study
por: Chen, Xiaolin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A comprehensive analysis of the factors of positive pelvic lymph nodes on survival of cervical cancer patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC1p
por: Yan, Ding-Ding, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Pretreatment [(18)F]FDG PET/CT Prognostic Factors in Patients with Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma FIGO IIIC1
por: Burchardt, Ewa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Critical analysis of the FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Hypoxic isolated abdominal perfusion breaks through chemoresistance in recurrent FIGO stage IIIC and IV ovarian cancer
por: Aigner, Karl R., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparing Paclitaxel–Carboplatin with Paclitaxel–Cisplatin as the Front-Line Chemotherapy for Patients with FIGO IIIC Serous-Type Tubo-Ovarian Cancer
por: Huang, Chen-Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Interval Debulking Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
por: Rutten, Marianne J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Effect of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Surgical Volume on Oncology Outcomes in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Li, Pengfei, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prognostic significance of urokinase (uPA) and its inhibitor PAI-1 for survival in advanced ovarian carcinoma stage FIGO IIIc
por: Kuhn, W, et al.
Publicado: (1999)

FIGO Stage IV and Age Over 55 Years as Prognostic Predicators in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Struma Ovarii
por: Li, Sijian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors
por: Yan, Ding-Ding, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer
por: Li, Pengfei, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Nomograms Predicting Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Based on the 2018 FIGO Staging System
por: Meng, Qingyu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System of Cervical Cancer for Stage III Patients with a Cohort from China
por: Liu, Xiaoliang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with FIGO II to III Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma Under Radical Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 2018 FIGO Staging
por: Zang, Lele, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals
por: Liu, Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

자궁경부암: 개정된 2018 FIGO 병기와 자기공명영상을 중심으로
Publicado: (2021)

Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer
por: Ding, Yan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
por: Wagner-Larsen, Kari S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Survival After Abdominal Q-M Type B versus C2 Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Chen, Chunlin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009
por: Zhang, Yunqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Nomograms predicting the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer
por: Feng, Yifan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Diagnostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Revised 2018 FIGO Staging in Patients with Cervical Cancer
por: Tsuyoshi, Hideaki, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage
por: Balaya, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The risk of lymph node metastasis in the new FIGO 2018 stage IA cervical cancer with >7 mm diameter
por: Nicolai, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Curative treatment for stage IIIC2 cervical cancer: what to expect?
por: Mauro, Geovanne Pedro, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Computed tomography-based radiomic model at node level for the prediction of normal-sized lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer
por: Liu, Yujia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Implications of the revised cervical cancer FIGO staging system
por: Bhatla, Neerja, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_akk4f5s9214tv96f8dfjhmmk2m