Cargando…

Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Anesthetic Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Etomidate on Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE: To compare dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and etomidate in the induction of sedation and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification method. METHODS: This was a double-blind clinical trial study carried out on 128 patients. Using the block randomization me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moghisseh, Bardia, Modir, Hesameddin, Moshiri, Esmail, Motaghinia, Zahra, Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37180533
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_158_22
_version_ 1785039334632587264
author Moghisseh, Bardia
Modir, Hesameddin
Moshiri, Esmail
Motaghinia, Zahra
Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza
author_facet Moghisseh, Bardia
Modir, Hesameddin
Moshiri, Esmail
Motaghinia, Zahra
Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza
author_sort Moghisseh, Bardia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and etomidate in the induction of sedation and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification method. METHODS: This was a double-blind clinical trial study carried out on 128 patients. Using the block randomization method, the patients were divided into four equal groups (dexmedetomidine, ketamine, etomidate, and control). Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation, Ramsay Sedation Score were recorded every 5 min intraoperatively, in recovery, and 1, 2, 4, and 6 h postoperatively. Moreover, the Aldrete score was measured in recovery time for discharge from the recovery room. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was found to be 63.16 ± 6.07 years, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, and body mass index, SpO(2,) and heart rate (P > 0.05). From 15 min after the start of surgery to 6 h postoperatively, the mean arterial pressure in the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower than that in the other three groups, including ketamine, etomidate, and control (P < 0.05). The mean sedation score (Ramsay) during recovery and 1 h postoperatively was higher in the dexmedetomidine group compared with that in the control group, whereas the recovery time in the dexmedetomidine group was higher than that in the other groups (P < 0.001). In addition, the amount of propofol consumption in the two groups of dexmedetomidine and ketamine was significantly less than that in the etomidate and control groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, dexmedetomidine caused better hemodynamic changes with more reduction in blood pressure and heart rate, and patients in the dexmedetomidine group did not require any specific medical treatment. Moreover, higher patient satisfaction and longer recovery duration were observed in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other study groups. As such, it is suggested that dexmedetomidine be used as an adjuvant in cataract surgery for more sedation, analgesia, and optimal intraoperative conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10170987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101709872023-05-11 Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Anesthetic Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Etomidate on Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial Moghisseh, Bardia Modir, Hesameddin Moshiri, Esmail Motaghinia, Zahra Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza J Curr Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and etomidate in the induction of sedation and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification method. METHODS: This was a double-blind clinical trial study carried out on 128 patients. Using the block randomization method, the patients were divided into four equal groups (dexmedetomidine, ketamine, etomidate, and control). Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and arterial oxygen saturation, Ramsay Sedation Score were recorded every 5 min intraoperatively, in recovery, and 1, 2, 4, and 6 h postoperatively. Moreover, the Aldrete score was measured in recovery time for discharge from the recovery room. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was found to be 63.16 ± 6.07 years, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, and body mass index, SpO(2,) and heart rate (P > 0.05). From 15 min after the start of surgery to 6 h postoperatively, the mean arterial pressure in the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower than that in the other three groups, including ketamine, etomidate, and control (P < 0.05). The mean sedation score (Ramsay) during recovery and 1 h postoperatively was higher in the dexmedetomidine group compared with that in the control group, whereas the recovery time in the dexmedetomidine group was higher than that in the other groups (P < 0.001). In addition, the amount of propofol consumption in the two groups of dexmedetomidine and ketamine was significantly less than that in the etomidate and control groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, dexmedetomidine caused better hemodynamic changes with more reduction in blood pressure and heart rate, and patients in the dexmedetomidine group did not require any specific medical treatment. Moreover, higher patient satisfaction and longer recovery duration were observed in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other study groups. As such, it is suggested that dexmedetomidine be used as an adjuvant in cataract surgery for more sedation, analgesia, and optimal intraoperative conditions. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10170987/ /pubmed/37180533 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_158_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Current Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moghisseh, Bardia
Modir, Hesameddin
Moshiri, Esmail
Motaghinia, Zahra
Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza
Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Anesthetic Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Etomidate on Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Anesthetic Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Etomidate on Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Anesthetic Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Etomidate on Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Anesthetic Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Etomidate on Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Anesthetic Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Etomidate on Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Anesthetic Effect of Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, and Etomidate on Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and anesthetic effect of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and etomidate on cataract surgery by phacoemulsification method: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10170987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37180533
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_158_22
work_keys_str_mv AT moghissehbardia comparisonofthesedativehemodynamicandanestheticeffectofdexmedetomidineketamineandetomidateoncataractsurgerybyphacoemulsificationmethodarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT modirhesameddin comparisonofthesedativehemodynamicandanestheticeffectofdexmedetomidineketamineandetomidateoncataractsurgerybyphacoemulsificationmethodarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT moshiriesmail comparisonofthesedativehemodynamicandanestheticeffectofdexmedetomidineketamineandetomidateoncataractsurgerybyphacoemulsificationmethodarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT motaghiniazahra comparisonofthesedativehemodynamicandanestheticeffectofdexmedetomidineketamineandetomidateoncataractsurgerybyphacoemulsificationmethodarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bozorgmaneshmohammadreza comparisonofthesedativehemodynamicandanestheticeffectofdexmedetomidineketamineandetomidateoncataractsurgerybyphacoemulsificationmethodarandomizedclinicaltrial