Cargando…
Clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns
Improvements in molecular breast imaging (MBI) have increased the use of MBI as adjunct diagnostic modality and alternative to MRI. We aimed to assess the value of MBI in patients with equivocal breast lesions on conventional imaging, especially in terms of its ability to rule out malignancy. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001684 |
_version_ | 1785039396567777280 |
---|---|
author | van Loevezijn, Ariane A. Corion, Christinne L.S. Zeillemaker, Anneke M. Wijers, Lidy M.H. Smithuis, Robin H.M. Valdés Olmos, Renato A. van der Hage, Jos A. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee Benard, Menno Pereira Arias-Bouda, Lenka M. |
author_facet | van Loevezijn, Ariane A. Corion, Christinne L.S. Zeillemaker, Anneke M. Wijers, Lidy M.H. Smithuis, Robin H.M. Valdés Olmos, Renato A. van der Hage, Jos A. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee Benard, Menno Pereira Arias-Bouda, Lenka M. |
author_sort | van Loevezijn, Ariane A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Improvements in molecular breast imaging (MBI) have increased the use of MBI as adjunct diagnostic modality and alternative to MRI. We aimed to assess the value of MBI in patients with equivocal breast lesions on conventional imaging, especially in terms of its ability to rule out malignancy. METHODS: We selected patients who underwent MBI in addition to conventional diagnostics due to equivocal breast lesions between 2012 and 2015. All patients underwent digital mammography, target ultrasound and MBI. MBI was performed using a single-head Dilon 6800 gamma camera after administration of 600 MBq (99m)Tc-sestamibi. Imaging was reported according to BI-RADS classification and compared with pathology or follow-up of ≥6 months. RESULTS: Of 226 women included, pathology was obtained in 106 (47%) and (pre)malignant lesions were found in 25 (11%). Median follow-up was 5.4 years (IQR 3.9–7.1). Sensitivity was higher for MBI compared to conventional diagnostics (84% vs. 32%; P = 0.002), identifying malignancy in 21 and 6 patients, respectively, but specificity did not differ (86% vs. 81%; P = 0.161). Positive and negative predictive value were 43% and 98% for MBI and 17% and 91% for conventional diagnostics. MBI was discordant with conventional diagnostics in 68 (30%) patients and correctly changed diagnosis in 46 (20%) patients, identifying 15 malignant lesions. In subgroups with nipple discharge (N = 42) and BI-RADS 3 lesions (N = 113) MBI detected 7 of 8 occult malignancies. CONCLUSION: MBI correctly adjusted treatment in 20% of patients with diagnostic concerns after conventional work-up, and could rule out malignancy with a high negative predictive value of 98%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10171295 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101712952023-05-11 Clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns van Loevezijn, Ariane A. Corion, Christinne L.S. Zeillemaker, Anneke M. Wijers, Lidy M.H. Smithuis, Robin H.M. Valdés Olmos, Renato A. van der Hage, Jos A. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee Benard, Menno Pereira Arias-Bouda, Lenka M. Nucl Med Commun Original Articles Improvements in molecular breast imaging (MBI) have increased the use of MBI as adjunct diagnostic modality and alternative to MRI. We aimed to assess the value of MBI in patients with equivocal breast lesions on conventional imaging, especially in terms of its ability to rule out malignancy. METHODS: We selected patients who underwent MBI in addition to conventional diagnostics due to equivocal breast lesions between 2012 and 2015. All patients underwent digital mammography, target ultrasound and MBI. MBI was performed using a single-head Dilon 6800 gamma camera after administration of 600 MBq (99m)Tc-sestamibi. Imaging was reported according to BI-RADS classification and compared with pathology or follow-up of ≥6 months. RESULTS: Of 226 women included, pathology was obtained in 106 (47%) and (pre)malignant lesions were found in 25 (11%). Median follow-up was 5.4 years (IQR 3.9–7.1). Sensitivity was higher for MBI compared to conventional diagnostics (84% vs. 32%; P = 0.002), identifying malignancy in 21 and 6 patients, respectively, but specificity did not differ (86% vs. 81%; P = 0.161). Positive and negative predictive value were 43% and 98% for MBI and 17% and 91% for conventional diagnostics. MBI was discordant with conventional diagnostics in 68 (30%) patients and correctly changed diagnosis in 46 (20%) patients, identifying 15 malignant lesions. In subgroups with nipple discharge (N = 42) and BI-RADS 3 lesions (N = 113) MBI detected 7 of 8 occult malignancies. CONCLUSION: MBI correctly adjusted treatment in 20% of patients with diagnostic concerns after conventional work-up, and could rule out malignancy with a high negative predictive value of 98%. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10171295/ /pubmed/36897051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001684 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles van Loevezijn, Ariane A. Corion, Christinne L.S. Zeillemaker, Anneke M. Wijers, Lidy M.H. Smithuis, Robin H.M. Valdés Olmos, Renato A. van der Hage, Jos A. de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee Benard, Menno Pereira Arias-Bouda, Lenka M. Clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns |
title | Clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns |
title_full | Clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns |
title_fullStr | Clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns |
title_short | Clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns |
title_sort | clinical impact of molecular breast imaging as adjunct diagnostic modality in evaluation of indeterminate breast abnormalities and unresolved diagnostic concerns |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171295/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanloevezijnarianea clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns AT corionchristinnels clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns AT zeillemakerannekem clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns AT wijerslidymh clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns AT smithuisrobinhm clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns AT valdesolmosrenatoa clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns AT vanderhagejosa clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns AT degeusoeilioefee clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns AT benardmenno clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns AT pereiraariasboudalenkam clinicalimpactofmolecularbreastimagingasadjunctdiagnosticmodalityinevaluationofindeterminatebreastabnormalitiesandunresolveddiagnosticconcerns |