Cargando…

Investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: A randomized clinical trial

The results of the pinprick and cold tests performed on the arm, forearm, and wrist-wrist areas of patients scheduled for upper extremity procedures are subjective and dependent on patient’s compliance. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the perfusion index (PI) could be used as an o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şeyhanlı, İbrahim, Duran, Mehmet, Yılmaz, Nezir, Nakır, Hamza, Doğukan, Mevlüt, Uludağ, Öznur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Association of Basic Medical Sciences of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321618
http://dx.doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2022.8214
_version_ 1785039418752499712
author Şeyhanlı, İbrahim
Duran, Mehmet
Yılmaz, Nezir
Nakır, Hamza
Doğukan, Mevlüt
Uludağ, Öznur
author_facet Şeyhanlı, İbrahim
Duran, Mehmet
Yılmaz, Nezir
Nakır, Hamza
Doğukan, Mevlüt
Uludağ, Öznur
author_sort Şeyhanlı, İbrahim
collection PubMed
description The results of the pinprick and cold tests performed on the arm, forearm, and wrist-wrist areas of patients scheduled for upper extremity procedures are subjective and dependent on patient’s compliance. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the perfusion index (PI) could be used as an objective indicator to demonstrate block efficacy. Fifty patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years who were scheduled for upper extremity procedures and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists risk assessment class of I–II were included in this study. Infraclavicular block was performed on the patients using the peripheral nerve stimulation and ultrasonography. Preoperative and postoperative PI values were measured and recorded. The pinprick test took an average of 7.98 ± 1.49 minutes to turn positive, whereas the grade 3 of Modified Bromage Scale took an average of 11.08 ± 1.71 minutes. Differences between baseline values and perioperative values were found to be significantly different in the paired comparisons of the PI values. With 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity, increases in the PI value by or above 3.8 units were indicative for sensory block. With 84% sensitivity and 84% specificity, increases in the PI value by or above 3.9 units were indicative for grade 3 of Modified Bromage Scale in patients. It was determined that the PI is a faster, more reliable, and simpler technique than conventional methods for determining the efficacy of a block because of the vasodilatation that occurs before sensory and motor block.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10171442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Association of Basic Medical Sciences of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101714422023-06-01 Investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: A randomized clinical trial Şeyhanlı, İbrahim Duran, Mehmet Yılmaz, Nezir Nakır, Hamza Doğukan, Mevlüt Uludağ, Öznur Biomol Biomed Research Article The results of the pinprick and cold tests performed on the arm, forearm, and wrist-wrist areas of patients scheduled for upper extremity procedures are subjective and dependent on patient’s compliance. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the perfusion index (PI) could be used as an objective indicator to demonstrate block efficacy. Fifty patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years who were scheduled for upper extremity procedures and had an American Society of Anesthesiologists risk assessment class of I–II were included in this study. Infraclavicular block was performed on the patients using the peripheral nerve stimulation and ultrasonography. Preoperative and postoperative PI values were measured and recorded. The pinprick test took an average of 7.98 ± 1.49 minutes to turn positive, whereas the grade 3 of Modified Bromage Scale took an average of 11.08 ± 1.71 minutes. Differences between baseline values and perioperative values were found to be significantly different in the paired comparisons of the PI values. With 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity, increases in the PI value by or above 3.8 units were indicative for sensory block. With 84% sensitivity and 84% specificity, increases in the PI value by or above 3.9 units were indicative for grade 3 of Modified Bromage Scale in patients. It was determined that the PI is a faster, more reliable, and simpler technique than conventional methods for determining the efficacy of a block because of the vasodilatation that occurs before sensory and motor block. Association of Basic Medical Sciences of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2023-06-01 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10171442/ /pubmed/36321618 http://dx.doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2022.8214 Text en © 2022 Şeyhanlı et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Şeyhanlı, İbrahim
Duran, Mehmet
Yılmaz, Nezir
Nakır, Hamza
Doğukan, Mevlüt
Uludağ, Öznur
Investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: A randomized clinical trial
title Investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: a randomized clinical trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36321618
http://dx.doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2022.8214
work_keys_str_mv AT seyhanlıibrahim investigationofinfraclavicularblocksuccessusingtheperfusionindexarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT duranmehmet investigationofinfraclavicularblocksuccessusingtheperfusionindexarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yılmaznezir investigationofinfraclavicularblocksuccessusingtheperfusionindexarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT nakırhamza investigationofinfraclavicularblocksuccessusingtheperfusionindexarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dogukanmevlut investigationofinfraclavicularblocksuccessusingtheperfusionindexarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT uludagoznur investigationofinfraclavicularblocksuccessusingtheperfusionindexarandomizedclinicaltrial