Cargando…

Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking

We study an individual’s propensity for rational thinking; the avoidance of cognitive biases (unconscious errors generated by our mental simplification methods) using a novel augmented reality (AR) platform. Specifically, we developed an odd-one-out (OOO) game-like task in AR designed to try to indu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Słowiński, Piotr, Grindley, Ben, Muncie, Helen, Harris, David J, Vine, Samuel J, Wilson, Mark R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bern Open Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179771
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.3.4
_version_ 1785039523875389440
author Słowiński, Piotr
Grindley, Ben
Muncie, Helen
Harris, David J
Vine, Samuel J
Wilson, Mark R
author_facet Słowiński, Piotr
Grindley, Ben
Muncie, Helen
Harris, David J
Vine, Samuel J
Wilson, Mark R
author_sort Słowiński, Piotr
collection PubMed
description We study an individual’s propensity for rational thinking; the avoidance of cognitive biases (unconscious errors generated by our mental simplification methods) using a novel augmented reality (AR) platform. Specifically, we developed an odd-one-out (OOO) game-like task in AR designed to try to induce and assess confirmatory biases. Forty students completed the AR task in the laboratory, and the short form of the comprehensive assessment of rational thinking (CART) online via the Qualtrics platform. We demonstrate that behavioural markers (based on eye, hand and head movements) can be associated (linear regression) with the short CART score – more rational thinkers have slower head and hand movements and faster gaze movements in the second more ambiguous round of the OOO task. Furthermore, short CART scores can be associated with the change in behaviour between two rounds of the OOO task (one less and one more ambiguous) – hand-eye-head coordination patterns of the more rational thinkers are more consistent in the two rounds. Overall, we demonstrate the benefits of augmenting eye-tracking recordings with additional data modalities when trying to understand complicated behaviours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10171922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101719222023-05-11 Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking Słowiński, Piotr Grindley, Ben Muncie, Helen Harris, David J Vine, Samuel J Wilson, Mark R J Eye Mov Res Research Article We study an individual’s propensity for rational thinking; the avoidance of cognitive biases (unconscious errors generated by our mental simplification methods) using a novel augmented reality (AR) platform. Specifically, we developed an odd-one-out (OOO) game-like task in AR designed to try to induce and assess confirmatory biases. Forty students completed the AR task in the laboratory, and the short form of the comprehensive assessment of rational thinking (CART) online via the Qualtrics platform. We demonstrate that behavioural markers (based on eye, hand and head movements) can be associated (linear regression) with the short CART score – more rational thinkers have slower head and hand movements and faster gaze movements in the second more ambiguous round of the OOO task. Furthermore, short CART scores can be associated with the change in behaviour between two rounds of the OOO task (one less and one more ambiguous) – hand-eye-head coordination patterns of the more rational thinkers are more consistent in the two rounds. Overall, we demonstrate the benefits of augmenting eye-tracking recordings with additional data modalities when trying to understand complicated behaviours. Bern Open Publishing 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10171922/ /pubmed/37179771 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.3.4 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Słowiński, Piotr
Grindley, Ben
Muncie, Helen
Harris, David J
Vine, Samuel J
Wilson, Mark R
Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking
title Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking
title_full Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking
title_fullStr Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking
title_short Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking
title_sort assessment of cognitive biases in augmented reality: beyond eye tracking
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179771
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.3.4
work_keys_str_mv AT słowinskipiotr assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking
AT grindleyben assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking
AT munciehelen assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking
AT harrisdavidj assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking
AT vinesamuelj assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking
AT wilsonmarkr assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking