Cargando…
Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking
We study an individual’s propensity for rational thinking; the avoidance of cognitive biases (unconscious errors generated by our mental simplification methods) using a novel augmented reality (AR) platform. Specifically, we developed an odd-one-out (OOO) game-like task in AR designed to try to indu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bern Open Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179771 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.3.4 |
_version_ | 1785039523875389440 |
---|---|
author | Słowiński, Piotr Grindley, Ben Muncie, Helen Harris, David J Vine, Samuel J Wilson, Mark R |
author_facet | Słowiński, Piotr Grindley, Ben Muncie, Helen Harris, David J Vine, Samuel J Wilson, Mark R |
author_sort | Słowiński, Piotr |
collection | PubMed |
description | We study an individual’s propensity for rational thinking; the avoidance of cognitive biases (unconscious errors generated by our mental simplification methods) using a novel augmented reality (AR) platform. Specifically, we developed an odd-one-out (OOO) game-like task in AR designed to try to induce and assess confirmatory biases. Forty students completed the AR task in the laboratory, and the short form of the comprehensive assessment of rational thinking (CART) online via the Qualtrics platform. We demonstrate that behavioural markers (based on eye, hand and head movements) can be associated (linear regression) with the short CART score – more rational thinkers have slower head and hand movements and faster gaze movements in the second more ambiguous round of the OOO task. Furthermore, short CART scores can be associated with the change in behaviour between two rounds of the OOO task (one less and one more ambiguous) – hand-eye-head coordination patterns of the more rational thinkers are more consistent in the two rounds. Overall, we demonstrate the benefits of augmenting eye-tracking recordings with additional data modalities when trying to understand complicated behaviours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10171922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Bern Open Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101719222023-05-11 Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking Słowiński, Piotr Grindley, Ben Muncie, Helen Harris, David J Vine, Samuel J Wilson, Mark R J Eye Mov Res Research Article We study an individual’s propensity for rational thinking; the avoidance of cognitive biases (unconscious errors generated by our mental simplification methods) using a novel augmented reality (AR) platform. Specifically, we developed an odd-one-out (OOO) game-like task in AR designed to try to induce and assess confirmatory biases. Forty students completed the AR task in the laboratory, and the short form of the comprehensive assessment of rational thinking (CART) online via the Qualtrics platform. We demonstrate that behavioural markers (based on eye, hand and head movements) can be associated (linear regression) with the short CART score – more rational thinkers have slower head and hand movements and faster gaze movements in the second more ambiguous round of the OOO task. Furthermore, short CART scores can be associated with the change in behaviour between two rounds of the OOO task (one less and one more ambiguous) – hand-eye-head coordination patterns of the more rational thinkers are more consistent in the two rounds. Overall, we demonstrate the benefits of augmenting eye-tracking recordings with additional data modalities when trying to understand complicated behaviours. Bern Open Publishing 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10171922/ /pubmed/37179771 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.3.4 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Słowiński, Piotr Grindley, Ben Muncie, Helen Harris, David J Vine, Samuel J Wilson, Mark R Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking |
title | Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking |
title_full | Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking |
title_fullStr | Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking |
title_short | Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking |
title_sort | assessment of cognitive biases in augmented reality: beyond eye tracking |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37179771 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.15.3.4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT słowinskipiotr assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking AT grindleyben assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking AT munciehelen assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking AT harrisdavidj assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking AT vinesamuelj assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking AT wilsonmarkr assessmentofcognitivebiasesinaugmentedrealitybeyondeyetracking |