Cargando…

Benefits versus drawbacks of delaying surgery due to additional consultations in older patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Additional evaluations, including second opinions, before breast cancer surgery may improve care, but may cause detrimental treatment delays that could allow disease progression. AIMS: We investigate the timing of surgical delays that are associated with survival benefits conferred by pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egleston, Brian L., Bleicher, Richard J., Fang, Carolyn Y., Galloway, Thomas J., Vucetic, Slobodan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36943210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1805
_version_ 1785039568807919616
author Egleston, Brian L.
Bleicher, Richard J.
Fang, Carolyn Y.
Galloway, Thomas J.
Vucetic, Slobodan
author_facet Egleston, Brian L.
Bleicher, Richard J.
Fang, Carolyn Y.
Galloway, Thomas J.
Vucetic, Slobodan
author_sort Egleston, Brian L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Additional evaluations, including second opinions, before breast cancer surgery may improve care, but may cause detrimental treatment delays that could allow disease progression. AIMS: We investigate the timing of surgical delays that are associated with survival benefits conferred by preoperative encounters versus the timing that are associated with potential harm. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated survival outcomes of SEER Medicare patients with stage 1–3 breast cancer using propensity score‐based weighting. We examined interactions between the number of preoperative evaluation components and time from biopsy to definitive surgery. Components include new patient visits, unique surgeons, medical oncologists, or radiation oncologists consulted, established patient encounters, biopsies, and imaging studies. We identified 116 050 cases of whom 99% were female and had an average age of 75.0 (SD = 6.2). We found that new patient visits have a protective association with respect to breast cancer mortality if they occur quickly after diagnosis with breast cancer mortality subdistribution Hazard Ratios [sHRs] = 0.87 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.76–1.00) for 2, 0.71 (CI 0.55–0.92) for 3, and 0.63 (CI 0.37–1.07) for 4+ visits at minimal delay. New patient visits predict worsened mortality compared with no visits if the surgical delay is greater than 33 days (CI 14–53) for 2, 33 days (CI 17–49) for 3, and 44 days (CI 12–75) for 4+. Medical oncologist visits predict worse outcomes if the surgical delay is greater than 29 days (CI 20–39) for 1 and 38 days (CI 12–65) for 2+ visits. Similarly, surgeon encounters switch from a positive to a negative association if the surgical delay exceeds 29 days (CI 17–41) for 1 visit, but the positive estimate persists over time for 3+ surgeon visits. CONCLUSION: Preoperative visits that cause substantial delays may be associated with increased mortality in older patients with breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10172180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101721802023-05-12 Benefits versus drawbacks of delaying surgery due to additional consultations in older patients with breast cancer Egleston, Brian L. Bleicher, Richard J. Fang, Carolyn Y. Galloway, Thomas J. Vucetic, Slobodan Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Additional evaluations, including second opinions, before breast cancer surgery may improve care, but may cause detrimental treatment delays that could allow disease progression. AIMS: We investigate the timing of surgical delays that are associated with survival benefits conferred by preoperative encounters versus the timing that are associated with potential harm. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated survival outcomes of SEER Medicare patients with stage 1–3 breast cancer using propensity score‐based weighting. We examined interactions between the number of preoperative evaluation components and time from biopsy to definitive surgery. Components include new patient visits, unique surgeons, medical oncologists, or radiation oncologists consulted, established patient encounters, biopsies, and imaging studies. We identified 116 050 cases of whom 99% were female and had an average age of 75.0 (SD = 6.2). We found that new patient visits have a protective association with respect to breast cancer mortality if they occur quickly after diagnosis with breast cancer mortality subdistribution Hazard Ratios [sHRs] = 0.87 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.76–1.00) for 2, 0.71 (CI 0.55–0.92) for 3, and 0.63 (CI 0.37–1.07) for 4+ visits at minimal delay. New patient visits predict worsened mortality compared with no visits if the surgical delay is greater than 33 days (CI 14–53) for 2, 33 days (CI 17–49) for 3, and 44 days (CI 12–75) for 4+. Medical oncologist visits predict worse outcomes if the surgical delay is greater than 29 days (CI 20–39) for 1 and 38 days (CI 12–65) for 2+ visits. Similarly, surgeon encounters switch from a positive to a negative association if the surgical delay exceeds 29 days (CI 17–41) for 1 visit, but the positive estimate persists over time for 3+ surgeon visits. CONCLUSION: Preoperative visits that cause substantial delays may be associated with increased mortality in older patients with breast cancer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10172180/ /pubmed/36943210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1805 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Egleston, Brian L.
Bleicher, Richard J.
Fang, Carolyn Y.
Galloway, Thomas J.
Vucetic, Slobodan
Benefits versus drawbacks of delaying surgery due to additional consultations in older patients with breast cancer
title Benefits versus drawbacks of delaying surgery due to additional consultations in older patients with breast cancer
title_full Benefits versus drawbacks of delaying surgery due to additional consultations in older patients with breast cancer
title_fullStr Benefits versus drawbacks of delaying surgery due to additional consultations in older patients with breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Benefits versus drawbacks of delaying surgery due to additional consultations in older patients with breast cancer
title_short Benefits versus drawbacks of delaying surgery due to additional consultations in older patients with breast cancer
title_sort benefits versus drawbacks of delaying surgery due to additional consultations in older patients with breast cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36943210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1805
work_keys_str_mv AT eglestonbrianl benefitsversusdrawbacksofdelayingsurgeryduetoadditionalconsultationsinolderpatientswithbreastcancer
AT bleicherrichardj benefitsversusdrawbacksofdelayingsurgeryduetoadditionalconsultationsinolderpatientswithbreastcancer
AT fangcarolyny benefitsversusdrawbacksofdelayingsurgeryduetoadditionalconsultationsinolderpatientswithbreastcancer
AT gallowaythomasj benefitsversusdrawbacksofdelayingsurgeryduetoadditionalconsultationsinolderpatientswithbreastcancer
AT vuceticslobodan benefitsversusdrawbacksofdelayingsurgeryduetoadditionalconsultationsinolderpatientswithbreastcancer