Cargando…

Views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening

Genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) are frequently included in panels for reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS), despite a lack of consensus on whether NSHL is a condition appropriate for inclusion in RGCS. We conducted a national online survey using a questionnaire to ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freeman, Lucinda, Delatycki, Martin B., Scully, Jackie Leach, Briggs, Nancy, Kirk, Edwin P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01239-y
_version_ 1785039592208990208
author Freeman, Lucinda
Delatycki, Martin B.
Scully, Jackie Leach
Briggs, Nancy
Kirk, Edwin P.
author_facet Freeman, Lucinda
Delatycki, Martin B.
Scully, Jackie Leach
Briggs, Nancy
Kirk, Edwin P.
author_sort Freeman, Lucinda
collection PubMed
description Genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) are frequently included in panels for reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS), despite a lack of consensus on whether NSHL is a condition appropriate for inclusion in RGCS. We conducted a national online survey using a questionnaire to explore the views of clinicians who facilitate RGCS or provide care to deaf individuals in Australia and New Zealand regarding the inclusion of such genes in RGCS. Results were analysed descriptively, and free-text responses were analysed thematically. The questionnaire was completed by 386 respondents including genetic healthcare providers, obstetricians, ear nose and throat specialists, and general practitioners. The majority of respondents agreed that genes associated with NSHL should be included in RGCS, but there were differences between the groups. 74% of clinicians working in a hearing clinic agreed these genes should be included compared to 67% of genetic healthcare providers, 54% of reproductive care healthcare providers, and 44% of general practitioners. A majority of respondents agreed that moderate to profound deafness is a serious disability, although genetic healthcare providers were less likely to agree than other groups. Overall, respondents agreed that including NSHL in RGCS upholds prospective parents’ right to information. However, they also identified major challenges, including concern that screening may express a discriminatory attitude towards those living with deafness. They also identified the complexity of defining the severity of deafness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10172293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101722932023-05-12 Views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening Freeman, Lucinda Delatycki, Martin B. Scully, Jackie Leach Briggs, Nancy Kirk, Edwin P. Eur J Hum Genet Article Genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) are frequently included in panels for reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS), despite a lack of consensus on whether NSHL is a condition appropriate for inclusion in RGCS. We conducted a national online survey using a questionnaire to explore the views of clinicians who facilitate RGCS or provide care to deaf individuals in Australia and New Zealand regarding the inclusion of such genes in RGCS. Results were analysed descriptively, and free-text responses were analysed thematically. The questionnaire was completed by 386 respondents including genetic healthcare providers, obstetricians, ear nose and throat specialists, and general practitioners. The majority of respondents agreed that genes associated with NSHL should be included in RGCS, but there were differences between the groups. 74% of clinicians working in a hearing clinic agreed these genes should be included compared to 67% of genetic healthcare providers, 54% of reproductive care healthcare providers, and 44% of general practitioners. A majority of respondents agreed that moderate to profound deafness is a serious disability, although genetic healthcare providers were less likely to agree than other groups. Overall, respondents agreed that including NSHL in RGCS upholds prospective parents’ right to information. However, they also identified major challenges, including concern that screening may express a discriminatory attitude towards those living with deafness. They also identified the complexity of defining the severity of deafness. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-09 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10172293/ /pubmed/36755103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01239-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Freeman, Lucinda
Delatycki, Martin B.
Scully, Jackie Leach
Briggs, Nancy
Kirk, Edwin P.
Views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening
title Views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening
title_full Views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening
title_fullStr Views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening
title_full_unstemmed Views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening
title_short Views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening
title_sort views of healthcare professionals on the inclusion of genes associated with non-syndromic hearing loss in reproductive genetic carrier screening
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01239-y
work_keys_str_mv AT freemanlucinda viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsontheinclusionofgenesassociatedwithnonsyndromichearinglossinreproductivegeneticcarrierscreening
AT delatyckimartinb viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsontheinclusionofgenesassociatedwithnonsyndromichearinglossinreproductivegeneticcarrierscreening
AT scullyjackieleach viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsontheinclusionofgenesassociatedwithnonsyndromichearinglossinreproductivegeneticcarrierscreening
AT briggsnancy viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsontheinclusionofgenesassociatedwithnonsyndromichearinglossinreproductivegeneticcarrierscreening
AT kirkedwinp viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsontheinclusionofgenesassociatedwithnonsyndromichearinglossinreproductivegeneticcarrierscreening