Cargando…

Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment

BACKGROUND: Femoral vein Doppler (FVD) is simpler than the VExUS score which is a multimodal scoring system based on combination of IVC diameter, hepatic venous Doppler, portal vein pulsatility and renal vein Doppler, may be useful in assessing right ventricular overload and signs of venous congesti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhardwaj, V., Rola, P., Denault, A., Vikneswaran, G., Spiegel, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-023-00321-w
_version_ 1785039619372351488
author Bhardwaj, V.
Rola, P.
Denault, A.
Vikneswaran, G.
Spiegel, R.
author_facet Bhardwaj, V.
Rola, P.
Denault, A.
Vikneswaran, G.
Spiegel, R.
author_sort Bhardwaj, V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Femoral vein Doppler (FVD) is simpler than the VExUS score which is a multimodal scoring system based on combination of IVC diameter, hepatic venous Doppler, portal vein pulsatility and renal vein Doppler, may be useful in assessing right ventricular overload and signs of venous congestion. There is limited data on the relationship between FVD and VExUS score. RESULTS: Adult post-cardiac surgery patients were assessed for venous congestion using the VExUS score and FVD. Agreement between VExUS and FVD was studied using Kappa test, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for VExUS and FVD was calculated keeping CVP as gold standard. In total, 107 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 55.67 ± 12.76. The accuracy of VExUS and FVD for detecting venous congestion was 80.37 (95% CI of 71.5 to 87.4) and 74.7 (95% CI of 65.4 to 82.6), respectively. The level of agreement between FVD and VExUS was moderate (Kappa value of 0.62, P < 0.001) while the agreement between FVD and CVP was weak (Kappa value of 0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: FVD has good accuracy for detecting venous congestion and shows moderate agreement with VExUS grading. With potentially easier physical accessibility and a shorter learning curve for novices, it may be a simple and valuable tool for assessing venous congestion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13089-023-00321-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10172460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101724602023-05-12 Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment Bhardwaj, V. Rola, P. Denault, A. Vikneswaran, G. Spiegel, R. Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Femoral vein Doppler (FVD) is simpler than the VExUS score which is a multimodal scoring system based on combination of IVC diameter, hepatic venous Doppler, portal vein pulsatility and renal vein Doppler, may be useful in assessing right ventricular overload and signs of venous congestion. There is limited data on the relationship between FVD and VExUS score. RESULTS: Adult post-cardiac surgery patients were assessed for venous congestion using the VExUS score and FVD. Agreement between VExUS and FVD was studied using Kappa test, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for VExUS and FVD was calculated keeping CVP as gold standard. In total, 107 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 55.67 ± 12.76. The accuracy of VExUS and FVD for detecting venous congestion was 80.37 (95% CI of 71.5 to 87.4) and 74.7 (95% CI of 65.4 to 82.6), respectively. The level of agreement between FVD and VExUS was moderate (Kappa value of 0.62, P < 0.001) while the agreement between FVD and CVP was weak (Kappa value of 0.49, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: FVD has good accuracy for detecting venous congestion and shows moderate agreement with VExUS grading. With potentially easier physical accessibility and a shorter learning curve for novices, it may be a simple and valuable tool for assessing venous congestion. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13089-023-00321-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10172460/ /pubmed/37165284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-023-00321-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bhardwaj, V.
Rola, P.
Denault, A.
Vikneswaran, G.
Spiegel, R.
Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment
title Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment
title_full Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment
title_fullStr Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment
title_full_unstemmed Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment
title_short Femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment
title_sort femoral vein pulsatility: a simple tool for venous congestion assessment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-023-00321-w
work_keys_str_mv AT bhardwajv femoralveinpulsatilityasimpletoolforvenouscongestionassessment
AT rolap femoralveinpulsatilityasimpletoolforvenouscongestionassessment
AT denaulta femoralveinpulsatilityasimpletoolforvenouscongestionassessment
AT vikneswarang femoralveinpulsatilityasimpletoolforvenouscongestionassessment
AT spiegelr femoralveinpulsatilityasimpletoolforvenouscongestionassessment