Cargando…
Legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning
There is an inherent tension between knowledge representation and reasoning. For an optimal representation and validation, an expressive language should be used. For an optimal automated reasoning, a simple one is preferred. Which language should we choose for our legal knowledge representation if o...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1136263 |
_version_ | 1785039652975017984 |
---|---|
author | Libal, Tomer |
author_facet | Libal, Tomer |
author_sort | Libal, Tomer |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is an inherent tension between knowledge representation and reasoning. For an optimal representation and validation, an expressive language should be used. For an optimal automated reasoning, a simple one is preferred. Which language should we choose for our legal knowledge representation if our goal is to apply automated legal reasoning? In this paper, we investigate the properties and requirements of each of these two applications. We suggest that by using Legal Linguistic Templates, one can solve the above tension in some practical situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10172645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101726452023-05-12 Legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning Libal, Tomer Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence There is an inherent tension between knowledge representation and reasoning. For an optimal representation and validation, an expressive language should be used. For an optimal automated reasoning, a simple one is preferred. Which language should we choose for our legal knowledge representation if our goal is to apply automated legal reasoning? In this paper, we investigate the properties and requirements of each of these two applications. We suggest that by using Legal Linguistic Templates, one can solve the above tension in some practical situations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10172645/ /pubmed/37181732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1136263 Text en Copyright © 2023 Libal. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Artificial Intelligence Libal, Tomer Legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning |
title | Legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning |
title_full | Legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning |
title_fullStr | Legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning |
title_full_unstemmed | Legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning |
title_short | Legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning |
title_sort | legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning |
topic | Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1136263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT libaltomer legallinguistictemplatesandthetensionbetweenlegalknowledgerepresentationandreasoning |