Cargando…
Differences in genome, transcriptome, miRNAome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer
Despite distant metastases being the critical factor affecting patients’ survival, they remain poorly understood. Our study thus aimed to molecularly characterize colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) and explore whether molecular profiles differ between Synchronous (SmCRC) and Metachronous (M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37182133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1133598 |
_version_ | 1785039661391937536 |
---|---|
author | Horak, Josef Kubecek, Ondrej Siskova, Anna Honkova, Katerina Chvojkova, Irena Krupova, Marketa Manethova, Monika Vodenkova, Sona García-Mulero, Sandra John, Stanislav Cecka, Filip Vodickova, Ludmila Petera, Jiri Filip, Stanislav Vymetalkova, Veronika |
author_facet | Horak, Josef Kubecek, Ondrej Siskova, Anna Honkova, Katerina Chvojkova, Irena Krupova, Marketa Manethova, Monika Vodenkova, Sona García-Mulero, Sandra John, Stanislav Cecka, Filip Vodickova, Ludmila Petera, Jiri Filip, Stanislav Vymetalkova, Veronika |
author_sort | Horak, Josef |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite distant metastases being the critical factor affecting patients’ survival, they remain poorly understood. Our study thus aimed to molecularly characterize colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) and explore whether molecular profiles differ between Synchronous (SmCRC) and Metachronous (MmCRC) colorectal cancer. This characterization was performed by whole exome sequencing, whole transcriptome, whole methylome, and miRNAome. The most frequent somatic mutations were in APC, SYNE1, TP53, and TTN genes. Among the differently methylated and expressed genes were those involved in cell adhesion, extracellular matrix organization and degradation, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction. The top up-regulated microRNAs were hsa-miR-135b-3p and -5p, and the hsa-miR-200-family while the hsa-miR-548-family belonged to the top down-regulated. MmCRC patients evinced higher tumor mutational burden, a wider median of duplications and deletions, and a heterogeneous mutational signature than SmCRC. Regarding chronicity, a significant down-regulation of SMOC2 and PPP1R9A genes in SmCRC compared to MmCRC was observed. Two miRNAs were deregulated between SmCRC and MmCRC, hsa-miR-625-3p and has-miR-1269-3p. The combined data identified the IPO5 gene. Regardless of miRNA expression levels, the combined analysis resulted in 107 deregulated genes related to relaxin, estrogen, PI3K-Akt, WNT signaling pathways, and intracellular second messenger signaling. The intersection between our and validation sets confirmed the validity of our results. We have identified genes and pathways that may be considered as actionable targets in CRCLMs. Our data also provide a valuable resource for understanding molecular distinctions between SmCRC and MmCRC. They have the potential to enhance the diagnosis, prognostication, and management of CRCLMs by a molecularly targeted approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10172672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101726722023-05-12 Differences in genome, transcriptome, miRNAome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer Horak, Josef Kubecek, Ondrej Siskova, Anna Honkova, Katerina Chvojkova, Irena Krupova, Marketa Manethova, Monika Vodenkova, Sona García-Mulero, Sandra John, Stanislav Cecka, Filip Vodickova, Ludmila Petera, Jiri Filip, Stanislav Vymetalkova, Veronika Front Oncol Oncology Despite distant metastases being the critical factor affecting patients’ survival, they remain poorly understood. Our study thus aimed to molecularly characterize colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) and explore whether molecular profiles differ between Synchronous (SmCRC) and Metachronous (MmCRC) colorectal cancer. This characterization was performed by whole exome sequencing, whole transcriptome, whole methylome, and miRNAome. The most frequent somatic mutations were in APC, SYNE1, TP53, and TTN genes. Among the differently methylated and expressed genes were those involved in cell adhesion, extracellular matrix organization and degradation, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction. The top up-regulated microRNAs were hsa-miR-135b-3p and -5p, and the hsa-miR-200-family while the hsa-miR-548-family belonged to the top down-regulated. MmCRC patients evinced higher tumor mutational burden, a wider median of duplications and deletions, and a heterogeneous mutational signature than SmCRC. Regarding chronicity, a significant down-regulation of SMOC2 and PPP1R9A genes in SmCRC compared to MmCRC was observed. Two miRNAs were deregulated between SmCRC and MmCRC, hsa-miR-625-3p and has-miR-1269-3p. The combined data identified the IPO5 gene. Regardless of miRNA expression levels, the combined analysis resulted in 107 deregulated genes related to relaxin, estrogen, PI3K-Akt, WNT signaling pathways, and intracellular second messenger signaling. The intersection between our and validation sets confirmed the validity of our results. We have identified genes and pathways that may be considered as actionable targets in CRCLMs. Our data also provide a valuable resource for understanding molecular distinctions between SmCRC and MmCRC. They have the potential to enhance the diagnosis, prognostication, and management of CRCLMs by a molecularly targeted approach. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10172672/ /pubmed/37182133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1133598 Text en Copyright © 2023 Horak, Kubecek, Siskova, Honkova, Chvojkova, Krupova, Manethova, Vodenkova, García-Mulero, John, Cecka, Vodickova, Petera, Filip and Vymetalkova https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Horak, Josef Kubecek, Ondrej Siskova, Anna Honkova, Katerina Chvojkova, Irena Krupova, Marketa Manethova, Monika Vodenkova, Sona García-Mulero, Sandra John, Stanislav Cecka, Filip Vodickova, Ludmila Petera, Jiri Filip, Stanislav Vymetalkova, Veronika Differences in genome, transcriptome, miRNAome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer |
title | Differences in genome, transcriptome, miRNAome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer |
title_full | Differences in genome, transcriptome, miRNAome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Differences in genome, transcriptome, miRNAome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in genome, transcriptome, miRNAome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer |
title_short | Differences in genome, transcriptome, miRNAome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer |
title_sort | differences in genome, transcriptome, mirnaome, and methylome in synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37182133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1133598 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horakjosef differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT kubecekondrej differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT siskovaanna differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT honkovakaterina differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT chvojkovairena differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT krupovamarketa differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT manethovamonika differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT vodenkovasona differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT garciamulerosandra differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT johnstanislav differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT ceckafilip differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT vodickovaludmila differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT peterajiri differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT filipstanislav differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer AT vymetalkovaveronika differencesingenometranscriptomemirnaomeandmethylomeinsynchronousandmetachronouslivermetastasisofcolorectalcancer |