Cargando…
Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing
Autor principal: | Sinclair, Brent J. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cris.2023.100057 |
Ejemplares similares
-
AI and Psychiatry: The ChatGPT Perspective
por: Okan, Çalıyurt
Publicado: (2023) -
Let's Look on the Bright Side of ChatGPT
por: Yoo, Jin-Hong
Publicado: (2023) -
Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life
por: Lin, Zhicheng
Publicado: (2023) -
ChatGPT, authorship, and medical publishing
por: Kleebayoon, Amnuay, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
“Chatting with ChatGPT”: Analyzing the factors influencing users' intention to Use the Open AI's ChatGPT using the UTAUT model
por: Menon, Devadas, et al.
Publicado: (2023)