Cargando…

An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine

Background: Neuromuscular monitoring by acceleromyography assesses the effects of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents used during anaesthesia induction to optimise intubation conditions. A new type of neuromuscular monitor, TOF-Cuff, integrates electrode stimulation into a blood pressure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Markle, Andrew, Horn, Katja, Welter, JoEllen, Dullenkopf, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876404
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.98124
_version_ 1785039723617583104
author Markle, Andrew
Horn, Katja
Welter, JoEllen
Dullenkopf, Alexander
author_facet Markle, Andrew
Horn, Katja
Welter, JoEllen
Dullenkopf, Alexander
author_sort Markle, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Background: Neuromuscular monitoring by acceleromyography assesses the effects of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents used during anaesthesia induction to optimise intubation conditions. A new type of neuromuscular monitor, TOF-Cuff, integrates electrode stimulation into a blood pressure monitoring cuff. Comparisons of this device with TOF-Scan, considered a clinical standard acceleromyography device, have not been published. Methods: This prospective, observational study was approved by the Ethics Committee East Switzerland (BASEC-nr. 2016-02044), and patients’ consent was obtained before inclusion. The study’s aim was to compare TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan by measuring the duration from the administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0%. After anaesthesia induction, atracurium was administered (0.5 mg kg(−1)) and TOF ratios were recorded every 15 seconds using the two devices simultaneously. Patients were grouped according to body mass index (< or ≥ 30 kg m(−2)). Results: Twenty-five non-obese and twenty-five obese patients were included. In non-obese patients, bias was −3 s (± 21.2; limits of agreement −44.7 to 38.4; P = 0.702). In obese patients, bias was −20 s (± 35.0; limits of agreement −88.6 to 48.6; P = 0.0139). Large intra-individual differences of up to 60 seconds were detected even in non-obese patients. Conclusions: A significant systematic difference in the time to reach a TOF ratio of 0% was found when using the two devices in obese patients. In non-obese and obese patients, there were large intra-individual and clinically relevant differences. The two devices cannot be used interchangeably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10172956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101729562023-05-17 An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine Markle, Andrew Horn, Katja Welter, JoEllen Dullenkopf, Alexander Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Original and Clinical Articles Background: Neuromuscular monitoring by acceleromyography assesses the effects of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents used during anaesthesia induction to optimise intubation conditions. A new type of neuromuscular monitor, TOF-Cuff, integrates electrode stimulation into a blood pressure monitoring cuff. Comparisons of this device with TOF-Scan, considered a clinical standard acceleromyography device, have not been published. Methods: This prospective, observational study was approved by the Ethics Committee East Switzerland (BASEC-nr. 2016-02044), and patients’ consent was obtained before inclusion. The study’s aim was to compare TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan by measuring the duration from the administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0%. After anaesthesia induction, atracurium was administered (0.5 mg kg(−1)) and TOF ratios were recorded every 15 seconds using the two devices simultaneously. Patients were grouped according to body mass index (< or ≥ 30 kg m(−2)). Results: Twenty-five non-obese and twenty-five obese patients were included. In non-obese patients, bias was −3 s (± 21.2; limits of agreement −44.7 to 38.4; P = 0.702). In obese patients, bias was −20 s (± 35.0; limits of agreement −88.6 to 48.6; P = 0.0139). Large intra-individual differences of up to 60 seconds were detected even in non-obese patients. Conclusions: A significant systematic difference in the time to reach a TOF ratio of 0% was found when using the two devices in obese patients. In non-obese and obese patients, there were large intra-individual and clinically relevant differences. The two devices cannot be used interchangeably. Termedia Publishing House 2020-08-14 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10172956/ /pubmed/32876404 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.98124 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original and Clinical Articles
Markle, Andrew
Horn, Katja
Welter, JoEllen
Dullenkopf, Alexander
An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine
title An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine
title_full An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine
title_fullStr An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine
title_full_unstemmed An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine
title_short An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine
title_sort observational study comparing the performance of tof-cuff with tof-scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine
topic Original and Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876404
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.98124
work_keys_str_mv AT markleandrew anobservationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine
AT hornkatja anobservationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine
AT welterjoellen anobservationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine
AT dullenkopfalexander anobservationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine
AT markleandrew observationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine
AT hornkatja observationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine
AT welterjoellen observationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine
AT dullenkopfalexander observationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine