Cargando…
An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine
Background: Neuromuscular monitoring by acceleromyography assesses the effects of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents used during anaesthesia induction to optimise intubation conditions. A new type of neuromuscular monitor, TOF-Cuff, integrates electrode stimulation into a blood pressure...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876404 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.98124 |
_version_ | 1785039723617583104 |
---|---|
author | Markle, Andrew Horn, Katja Welter, JoEllen Dullenkopf, Alexander |
author_facet | Markle, Andrew Horn, Katja Welter, JoEllen Dullenkopf, Alexander |
author_sort | Markle, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Neuromuscular monitoring by acceleromyography assesses the effects of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents used during anaesthesia induction to optimise intubation conditions. A new type of neuromuscular monitor, TOF-Cuff, integrates electrode stimulation into a blood pressure monitoring cuff. Comparisons of this device with TOF-Scan, considered a clinical standard acceleromyography device, have not been published. Methods: This prospective, observational study was approved by the Ethics Committee East Switzerland (BASEC-nr. 2016-02044), and patients’ consent was obtained before inclusion. The study’s aim was to compare TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan by measuring the duration from the administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0%. After anaesthesia induction, atracurium was administered (0.5 mg kg(−1)) and TOF ratios were recorded every 15 seconds using the two devices simultaneously. Patients were grouped according to body mass index (< or ≥ 30 kg m(−2)). Results: Twenty-five non-obese and twenty-five obese patients were included. In non-obese patients, bias was −3 s (± 21.2; limits of agreement −44.7 to 38.4; P = 0.702). In obese patients, bias was −20 s (± 35.0; limits of agreement −88.6 to 48.6; P = 0.0139). Large intra-individual differences of up to 60 seconds were detected even in non-obese patients. Conclusions: A significant systematic difference in the time to reach a TOF ratio of 0% was found when using the two devices in obese patients. In non-obese and obese patients, there were large intra-individual and clinically relevant differences. The two devices cannot be used interchangeably. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10172956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101729562023-05-17 An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine Markle, Andrew Horn, Katja Welter, JoEllen Dullenkopf, Alexander Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Original and Clinical Articles Background: Neuromuscular monitoring by acceleromyography assesses the effects of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents used during anaesthesia induction to optimise intubation conditions. A new type of neuromuscular monitor, TOF-Cuff, integrates electrode stimulation into a blood pressure monitoring cuff. Comparisons of this device with TOF-Scan, considered a clinical standard acceleromyography device, have not been published. Methods: This prospective, observational study was approved by the Ethics Committee East Switzerland (BASEC-nr. 2016-02044), and patients’ consent was obtained before inclusion. The study’s aim was to compare TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan by measuring the duration from the administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0%. After anaesthesia induction, atracurium was administered (0.5 mg kg(−1)) and TOF ratios were recorded every 15 seconds using the two devices simultaneously. Patients were grouped according to body mass index (< or ≥ 30 kg m(−2)). Results: Twenty-five non-obese and twenty-five obese patients were included. In non-obese patients, bias was −3 s (± 21.2; limits of agreement −44.7 to 38.4; P = 0.702). In obese patients, bias was −20 s (± 35.0; limits of agreement −88.6 to 48.6; P = 0.0139). Large intra-individual differences of up to 60 seconds were detected even in non-obese patients. Conclusions: A significant systematic difference in the time to reach a TOF ratio of 0% was found when using the two devices in obese patients. In non-obese and obese patients, there were large intra-individual and clinically relevant differences. The two devices cannot be used interchangeably. Termedia Publishing House 2020-08-14 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10172956/ /pubmed/32876404 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.98124 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original and Clinical Articles Markle, Andrew Horn, Katja Welter, JoEllen Dullenkopf, Alexander An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine |
title | An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine |
title_full | An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine |
title_fullStr | An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine |
title_full_unstemmed | An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine |
title_short | An observational study comparing the performance of TOF-Cuff with TOF-Scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine |
title_sort | observational study comparing the performance of tof-cuff with tof-scan monitoring during anaesthetic induction in clinical routine |
topic | Original and Clinical Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876404 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.98124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markleandrew anobservationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine AT hornkatja anobservationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine AT welterjoellen anobservationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine AT dullenkopfalexander anobservationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine AT markleandrew observationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine AT hornkatja observationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine AT welterjoellen observationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine AT dullenkopfalexander observationalstudycomparingtheperformanceoftofcuffwithtofscanmonitoringduringanaestheticinductioninclinicalroutine |