Cargando…

Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not?

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, awake craniotomy for tumor resection has become a standard to maximize tumor resection and minimize the risk of permanent neurological deficits. Different techniques and medication regimes have been tested for this procedure. Until today there is no consensus on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raimann, Florian J., Adam, Elisabeth H., Strouhal, Ulrich, Zacharowski, Kai, Seifert, Volker, Forster, Marie-Therese
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090308
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.93043
_version_ 1785039755670454272
author Raimann, Florian J.
Adam, Elisabeth H.
Strouhal, Ulrich
Zacharowski, Kai
Seifert, Volker
Forster, Marie-Therese
author_facet Raimann, Florian J.
Adam, Elisabeth H.
Strouhal, Ulrich
Zacharowski, Kai
Seifert, Volker
Forster, Marie-Therese
author_sort Raimann, Florian J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, awake craniotomy for tumor resection has become a standard to maximize tumor resection and minimize the risk of permanent neurological deficits. Different techniques and medication regimes have been tested for this procedure. Until today there is no consensus on the optimal approach. Therefore, we investigated the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct in awake cerebral tumor surgery and evaluated our improved technique. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent awake craniotomy for tumor resection at our institution between 09/2006 and 05/2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were kept awake after cortical mapping. After changing our standard anesthetic procedure from propofol/remifentanil alone to propofol/remifentanil and dexmedetomidine, we performed an evaluation of time to arousal, drug dosages, patients’ cooperation and the occurrence of periprocedural adverse events. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients received propofol/remifentanil alone (SG). A further 17 patients additionally received dexmedetomidine following craniotomy in order to induce rapid arousal (DG). In the dexmedetomidine group a significantly reduced infusion time for propofol (169.2 ± 47.4 vs. 212.9 ± 63.3 minutes; P = 0.008) and non-significantly shorter time to arousal (12.0 [10.0/16.5] vs. 15.0 [10.0/20.0] minutes; P = 0.271) could be identified. In general, the overall procedure was very well tolerated by all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The asleep-awake technique is a well-accepted and safe procedure. It allows continuous surveillance of the patient’s neurological function during tumor resection and the postoperative phase, minimizing complications. In addition, our data show that the use of dexmedetomidine results in a shorter time to arousal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10173139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101731392023-05-17 Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not? Raimann, Florian J. Adam, Elisabeth H. Strouhal, Ulrich Zacharowski, Kai Seifert, Volker Forster, Marie-Therese Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Original and Clinical Articles BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, awake craniotomy for tumor resection has become a standard to maximize tumor resection and minimize the risk of permanent neurological deficits. Different techniques and medication regimes have been tested for this procedure. Until today there is no consensus on the optimal approach. Therefore, we investigated the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct in awake cerebral tumor surgery and evaluated our improved technique. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent awake craniotomy for tumor resection at our institution between 09/2006 and 05/2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were kept awake after cortical mapping. After changing our standard anesthetic procedure from propofol/remifentanil alone to propofol/remifentanil and dexmedetomidine, we performed an evaluation of time to arousal, drug dosages, patients’ cooperation and the occurrence of periprocedural adverse events. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients received propofol/remifentanil alone (SG). A further 17 patients additionally received dexmedetomidine following craniotomy in order to induce rapid arousal (DG). In the dexmedetomidine group a significantly reduced infusion time for propofol (169.2 ± 47.4 vs. 212.9 ± 63.3 minutes; P = 0.008) and non-significantly shorter time to arousal (12.0 [10.0/16.5] vs. 15.0 [10.0/20.0] minutes; P = 0.271) could be identified. In general, the overall procedure was very well tolerated by all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The asleep-awake technique is a well-accepted and safe procedure. It allows continuous surveillance of the patient’s neurological function during tumor resection and the postoperative phase, minimizing complications. In addition, our data show that the use of dexmedetomidine results in a shorter time to arousal. Termedia Publishing House 2020-02-12 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10173139/ /pubmed/32090308 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.93043 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original and Clinical Articles
Raimann, Florian J.
Adam, Elisabeth H.
Strouhal, Ulrich
Zacharowski, Kai
Seifert, Volker
Forster, Marie-Therese
Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not?
title Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not?
title_full Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not?
title_fullStr Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not?
title_full_unstemmed Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not?
title_short Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not?
title_sort dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not?
topic Original and Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090308
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.93043
work_keys_str_mv AT raimannflorianj dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot
AT adamelisabethh dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot
AT strouhalulrich dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot
AT zacharowskikai dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot
AT seifertvolker dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot
AT forstermarietherese dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot