Cargando…
Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not?
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, awake craniotomy for tumor resection has become a standard to maximize tumor resection and minimize the risk of permanent neurological deficits. Different techniques and medication regimes have been tested for this procedure. Until today there is no consensus on the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090308 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.93043 |
_version_ | 1785039755670454272 |
---|---|
author | Raimann, Florian J. Adam, Elisabeth H. Strouhal, Ulrich Zacharowski, Kai Seifert, Volker Forster, Marie-Therese |
author_facet | Raimann, Florian J. Adam, Elisabeth H. Strouhal, Ulrich Zacharowski, Kai Seifert, Volker Forster, Marie-Therese |
author_sort | Raimann, Florian J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, awake craniotomy for tumor resection has become a standard to maximize tumor resection and minimize the risk of permanent neurological deficits. Different techniques and medication regimes have been tested for this procedure. Until today there is no consensus on the optimal approach. Therefore, we investigated the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct in awake cerebral tumor surgery and evaluated our improved technique. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent awake craniotomy for tumor resection at our institution between 09/2006 and 05/2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were kept awake after cortical mapping. After changing our standard anesthetic procedure from propofol/remifentanil alone to propofol/remifentanil and dexmedetomidine, we performed an evaluation of time to arousal, drug dosages, patients’ cooperation and the occurrence of periprocedural adverse events. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients received propofol/remifentanil alone (SG). A further 17 patients additionally received dexmedetomidine following craniotomy in order to induce rapid arousal (DG). In the dexmedetomidine group a significantly reduced infusion time for propofol (169.2 ± 47.4 vs. 212.9 ± 63.3 minutes; P = 0.008) and non-significantly shorter time to arousal (12.0 [10.0/16.5] vs. 15.0 [10.0/20.0] minutes; P = 0.271) could be identified. In general, the overall procedure was very well tolerated by all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The asleep-awake technique is a well-accepted and safe procedure. It allows continuous surveillance of the patient’s neurological function during tumor resection and the postoperative phase, minimizing complications. In addition, our data show that the use of dexmedetomidine results in a shorter time to arousal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10173139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101731392023-05-17 Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not? Raimann, Florian J. Adam, Elisabeth H. Strouhal, Ulrich Zacharowski, Kai Seifert, Volker Forster, Marie-Therese Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Original and Clinical Articles BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, awake craniotomy for tumor resection has become a standard to maximize tumor resection and minimize the risk of permanent neurological deficits. Different techniques and medication regimes have been tested for this procedure. Until today there is no consensus on the optimal approach. Therefore, we investigated the effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjunct in awake cerebral tumor surgery and evaluated our improved technique. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent awake craniotomy for tumor resection at our institution between 09/2006 and 05/2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were kept awake after cortical mapping. After changing our standard anesthetic procedure from propofol/remifentanil alone to propofol/remifentanil and dexmedetomidine, we performed an evaluation of time to arousal, drug dosages, patients’ cooperation and the occurrence of periprocedural adverse events. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients received propofol/remifentanil alone (SG). A further 17 patients additionally received dexmedetomidine following craniotomy in order to induce rapid arousal (DG). In the dexmedetomidine group a significantly reduced infusion time for propofol (169.2 ± 47.4 vs. 212.9 ± 63.3 minutes; P = 0.008) and non-significantly shorter time to arousal (12.0 [10.0/16.5] vs. 15.0 [10.0/20.0] minutes; P = 0.271) could be identified. In general, the overall procedure was very well tolerated by all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The asleep-awake technique is a well-accepted and safe procedure. It allows continuous surveillance of the patient’s neurological function during tumor resection and the postoperative phase, minimizing complications. In addition, our data show that the use of dexmedetomidine results in a shorter time to arousal. Termedia Publishing House 2020-02-12 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10173139/ /pubmed/32090308 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.93043 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original and Clinical Articles Raimann, Florian J. Adam, Elisabeth H. Strouhal, Ulrich Zacharowski, Kai Seifert, Volker Forster, Marie-Therese Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not? |
title | Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not? |
title_full | Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not? |
title_fullStr | Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not? |
title_full_unstemmed | Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not? |
title_short | Dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not? |
title_sort | dexmedetomidine as adjunct in awake craniotomy – improvement or not? |
topic | Original and Clinical Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090308 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.93043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raimannflorianj dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot AT adamelisabethh dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot AT strouhalulrich dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot AT zacharowskikai dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot AT seifertvolker dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot AT forstermarietherese dexmedetomidineasadjunctinawakecraniotomyimprovementornot |