Cargando…

Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. Despite this, patterns of readmission following LC are not well defined. This meta-analysis aimed to determine rates and predictors of readmission. METHODS: An ethically approved International Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McIntyre, Caroline, Johnston, Alison, Foley, Deirdre, Lawler, Jack, Bucholc, Magda, Flanagan, Louise, Sugrue, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090306
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.92967
_version_ 1785039756627804160
author McIntyre, Caroline
Johnston, Alison
Foley, Deirdre
Lawler, Jack
Bucholc, Magda
Flanagan, Louise
Sugrue, Michael
author_facet McIntyre, Caroline
Johnston, Alison
Foley, Deirdre
Lawler, Jack
Bucholc, Magda
Flanagan, Louise
Sugrue, Michael
author_sort McIntyre, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. Despite this, patterns of readmission following LC are not well defined. This meta-analysis aimed to determine rates and predictors of readmission. METHODS: An ethically approved International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)-registered meta-analysis was undertaken searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases from January 2013–June 2018 adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Published literature potentially suitable for data analysis was graded using methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) criteria; papers scoring ≥ 16/24 for comparative and ≥ 10/16 for non-comparative studies were included. A meta-analysis of potential risk factors was performed by computing the odds ratio using Mantel-Haenszel method and fixed-effects model with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Three thousand and eight hundred thirty-two articles were reduced to 44 studies qualifying for a final analysis of 1,573,715 laparoscopic cholecystectomies from 25 countries. Overall readmission rate was 3.3% (range: 0.0–11.7%); 52,628 readmissions out of 1,573,715 LCs. Surgical complications accounted for 76% of reported reasons for readmission, predominantly bile duct complications (33%), wound infection (17%) and nausea and vomiting (9%). Pain (15%) and cardiorespiratory complications (8%) account for the remainder. Obesity, single port LC and day case LC were not associated with increased rates. CONCLUSIONS: Pain, nausea and vomiting and surgical complications, particularly bile duct obstruction are the most common causes for readmission. Intra-operative cholangiography may reduce readmission rates. Causes for readmission were inconsistently reported throughout. The mean readmission rate of 3.3% may act as a quality benchmark for improving LC, and clearer reporting of reasons for readmission are required to advance care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10173143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101731432023-05-17 Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis McIntyre, Caroline Johnston, Alison Foley, Deirdre Lawler, Jack Bucholc, Magda Flanagan, Louise Sugrue, Michael Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther Review Articles BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. Despite this, patterns of readmission following LC are not well defined. This meta-analysis aimed to determine rates and predictors of readmission. METHODS: An ethically approved International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)-registered meta-analysis was undertaken searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases from January 2013–June 2018 adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Published literature potentially suitable for data analysis was graded using methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) criteria; papers scoring ≥ 16/24 for comparative and ≥ 10/16 for non-comparative studies were included. A meta-analysis of potential risk factors was performed by computing the odds ratio using Mantel-Haenszel method and fixed-effects model with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Three thousand and eight hundred thirty-two articles were reduced to 44 studies qualifying for a final analysis of 1,573,715 laparoscopic cholecystectomies from 25 countries. Overall readmission rate was 3.3% (range: 0.0–11.7%); 52,628 readmissions out of 1,573,715 LCs. Surgical complications accounted for 76% of reported reasons for readmission, predominantly bile duct complications (33%), wound infection (17%) and nausea and vomiting (9%). Pain (15%) and cardiorespiratory complications (8%) account for the remainder. Obesity, single port LC and day case LC were not associated with increased rates. CONCLUSIONS: Pain, nausea and vomiting and surgical complications, particularly bile duct obstruction are the most common causes for readmission. Intra-operative cholangiography may reduce readmission rates. Causes for readmission were inconsistently reported throughout. The mean readmission rate of 3.3% may act as a quality benchmark for improving LC, and clearer reporting of reasons for readmission are required to advance care. Termedia Publishing House 2020-02-06 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10173143/ /pubmed/32090306 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.92967 Text en Copyright © Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Review Articles
McIntyre, Caroline
Johnston, Alison
Foley, Deirdre
Lawler, Jack
Bucholc, Magda
Flanagan, Louise
Sugrue, Michael
Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
title Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_full Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_short Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
title_sort readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32090306
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ait.2020.92967
work_keys_str_mv AT mcintyrecaroline readmissiontohospitalfollowinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyametaanalysis
AT johnstonalison readmissiontohospitalfollowinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyametaanalysis
AT foleydeirdre readmissiontohospitalfollowinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyametaanalysis
AT lawlerjack readmissiontohospitalfollowinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyametaanalysis
AT bucholcmagda readmissiontohospitalfollowinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyametaanalysis
AT flanaganlouise readmissiontohospitalfollowinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyametaanalysis
AT sugruemichael readmissiontohospitalfollowinglaparoscopiccholecystectomyametaanalysis