Cargando…

Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program

Background Detection of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) has implications for cancer screening, prognosis, treatment selection, clinical trial enrollment, and family testing. Published guidelines provide indications for PGV testing, determined by clinical and demographic factors, but their applic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Jeremy C, Golafshar, Michael A, Coston, Tucker W, Rao, Rohit, Wysokinska, Ewa, Johnson, Elizabeth, Esplin, Edward D, Nussbaum, Robert L, Heald, Brandie, Klint, Margaret, Barrus, Kathleen, Uson Jr., Pedro L, Nguyen, Cuong C, Colon-Otero, Gerald, Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S, Dronca, Roxana, Kunze, Katie L, Samadder, N. Jewel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181954
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37428
_version_ 1785039804513124352
author Jones, Jeremy C
Golafshar, Michael A
Coston, Tucker W
Rao, Rohit
Wysokinska, Ewa
Johnson, Elizabeth
Esplin, Edward D
Nussbaum, Robert L
Heald, Brandie
Klint, Margaret
Barrus, Kathleen
Uson Jr., Pedro L
Nguyen, Cuong C
Colon-Otero, Gerald
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S
Dronca, Roxana
Kunze, Katie L
Samadder, N. Jewel
author_facet Jones, Jeremy C
Golafshar, Michael A
Coston, Tucker W
Rao, Rohit
Wysokinska, Ewa
Johnson, Elizabeth
Esplin, Edward D
Nussbaum, Robert L
Heald, Brandie
Klint, Margaret
Barrus, Kathleen
Uson Jr., Pedro L
Nguyen, Cuong C
Colon-Otero, Gerald
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S
Dronca, Roxana
Kunze, Katie L
Samadder, N. Jewel
author_sort Jones, Jeremy C
collection PubMed
description Background Detection of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) has implications for cancer screening, prognosis, treatment selection, clinical trial enrollment, and family testing. Published guidelines provide indications for PGV testing, determined by clinical and demographic factors, but their applicability in an ethnically and racially diverse community hospital population is unknown. This study describes the diagnostic and incremental yield of universal multi-gene panel testing in a diverse population in a community cancer practice. Methods We completed a prospective study of proactive germline genetic sequencing among patients with solid tumor malignancies at a community-based oncology practice in downtown Jacksonville, FL, between June 2020 and September 2021. The patients were unselected for cancer type, stage, family history, race/ethnicity, and age. PGVs identified using an 84-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) tumor genomic testing platform were stratified by penetrance. National Comprehensive Cancer Networks (NCCN) guidelines determined incremental PGV rates. Results Two hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled, with a median age of 63 years, 78.5% female. 32.7% were Black/African American, and 5.4% were Hispanic. 39.9% of patients were commercially insured, Medicare/Medicaid insured 52.5%, and 2.7% were uninsured. The most common cancers in this cohort were breast (61.9%), lung (10.3%), and colorectal (7.2%). Twenty-three patients (10.3%) carried one or more PGVs, and 50.2% carried a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Though there was no significant difference in the rate of PGVs based on race/ethnicity, African Americans were numerically more likely to have a VUS reported than whites (P=0.059). Eighteen (8.1%) patients had incremental clinically actionable findings that practice guidelines would not have detected, which was higher in non-whites. Conclusions In this racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse cohort, universal multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) increased diagnostic yield over targeted guideline-informed testing. Rates of VUS and incremental PGV were higher in non-white populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10173369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101733692023-05-12 Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program Jones, Jeremy C Golafshar, Michael A Coston, Tucker W Rao, Rohit Wysokinska, Ewa Johnson, Elizabeth Esplin, Edward D Nussbaum, Robert L Heald, Brandie Klint, Margaret Barrus, Kathleen Uson Jr., Pedro L Nguyen, Cuong C Colon-Otero, Gerald Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S Dronca, Roxana Kunze, Katie L Samadder, N. Jewel Cureus Genetics Background Detection of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) has implications for cancer screening, prognosis, treatment selection, clinical trial enrollment, and family testing. Published guidelines provide indications for PGV testing, determined by clinical and demographic factors, but their applicability in an ethnically and racially diverse community hospital population is unknown. This study describes the diagnostic and incremental yield of universal multi-gene panel testing in a diverse population in a community cancer practice. Methods We completed a prospective study of proactive germline genetic sequencing among patients with solid tumor malignancies at a community-based oncology practice in downtown Jacksonville, FL, between June 2020 and September 2021. The patients were unselected for cancer type, stage, family history, race/ethnicity, and age. PGVs identified using an 84-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) tumor genomic testing platform were stratified by penetrance. National Comprehensive Cancer Networks (NCCN) guidelines determined incremental PGV rates. Results Two hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled, with a median age of 63 years, 78.5% female. 32.7% were Black/African American, and 5.4% were Hispanic. 39.9% of patients were commercially insured, Medicare/Medicaid insured 52.5%, and 2.7% were uninsured. The most common cancers in this cohort were breast (61.9%), lung (10.3%), and colorectal (7.2%). Twenty-three patients (10.3%) carried one or more PGVs, and 50.2% carried a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Though there was no significant difference in the rate of PGVs based on race/ethnicity, African Americans were numerically more likely to have a VUS reported than whites (P=0.059). Eighteen (8.1%) patients had incremental clinically actionable findings that practice guidelines would not have detected, which was higher in non-whites. Conclusions In this racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse cohort, universal multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) increased diagnostic yield over targeted guideline-informed testing. Rates of VUS and incremental PGV were higher in non-white populations. Cureus 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10173369/ /pubmed/37181954 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37428 Text en Copyright © 2023, Jones et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Genetics
Jones, Jeremy C
Golafshar, Michael A
Coston, Tucker W
Rao, Rohit
Wysokinska, Ewa
Johnson, Elizabeth
Esplin, Edward D
Nussbaum, Robert L
Heald, Brandie
Klint, Margaret
Barrus, Kathleen
Uson Jr., Pedro L
Nguyen, Cuong C
Colon-Otero, Gerald
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S
Dronca, Roxana
Kunze, Katie L
Samadder, N. Jewel
Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program
title Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program
title_full Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program
title_fullStr Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program
title_full_unstemmed Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program
title_short Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program
title_sort universal genetic testing vs. guideline-directed testing for hereditary cancer syndromes among traditionally underrepresented patients in a community oncology program
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37181954
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37428
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesjeremyc universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT golafsharmichaela universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT costontuckerw universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT raorohit universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT wysokinskaewa universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT johnsonelizabeth universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT esplinedwardd universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT nussbaumrobertl universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT healdbrandie universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT klintmargaret universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT barruskathleen universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT usonjrpedrol universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT nguyencuongc universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT colonoterogerald universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT bekaiisaabtanioss universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT droncaroxana universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT kunzekatiel universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram
AT samaddernjewel universalgenetictestingvsguidelinedirectedtestingforhereditarycancersyndromesamongtraditionallyunderrepresentedpatientsinacommunityoncologyprogram