Cargando…

Acceptability of intramuscular injection of tranexamic acid in postpartum hemorrhage prevention

BACKGROUND: Newer research comparing routes of medication administration has extended beyond efficacy as a primary endpoint to incorporate patient preference. However, little is known about the preferences of pregnant women in terms of routes of medication administration, specifically with regards t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cordes, Sophia A., Nesson, Alexandra R., Calderon, Joaquin, Abdelatif, Dinan S., Ahmadzia, Homa K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37180460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100195
_version_ 1785039891311099904
author Cordes, Sophia A.
Nesson, Alexandra R.
Calderon, Joaquin
Abdelatif, Dinan S.
Ahmadzia, Homa K.
author_facet Cordes, Sophia A.
Nesson, Alexandra R.
Calderon, Joaquin
Abdelatif, Dinan S.
Ahmadzia, Homa K.
author_sort Cordes, Sophia A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Newer research comparing routes of medication administration has extended beyond efficacy as a primary endpoint to incorporate patient preference. However, little is known about the preferences of pregnant women in terms of routes of medication administration, specifically with regards to hemorrhage prevention and control. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand the preferences of pregnant women in terms of medical interventions to prevent hemorrhage at the time of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Surveys were distributed from April 2022 to September 2022 using electronic tablets at a single urban center with an annual delivery volume of 3000 women per year to women >18 years of age who were either currently pregnant or have been pregnant in the past. Subjects were asked to choose their preferred route of administration from the following options: intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous. The primary outcome was patient preference on the route of medication administration during a hemorrhage event. RESULTS: The study cohort included 300 patients, mostly African American (39.8%) followed by White (32.1%), and the majority of the participants ranged from 30 to 34 years of age (31.7%). When asked which method of administration they would prefer to prevent hemorrhage before birth, the results were as follows: 31.1% would prefer intravenous, 23.0% had no preference, 21.2% were unsure, 15.9% preferred subcutaneous, and 8.8% preferred intramuscular administration. In addition, 69.4% of respondents reported that they have never declined or avoided intramuscular administration of medication if recommended by their physician. CONCLUSION: Although some survey participants preferred an intravenous route of administration, 68.9% of subjects were unsure, had no preference, or preferred nonintravenous routes. This information is helpful particularly in low-resource settings where intravenous treatments are not readily available or in urgent clinical situations in which intravenous administration routes are not easily obtainable in high-risk patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10173762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101737622023-05-12 Acceptability of intramuscular injection of tranexamic acid in postpartum hemorrhage prevention Cordes, Sophia A. Nesson, Alexandra R. Calderon, Joaquin Abdelatif, Dinan S. Ahmadzia, Homa K. AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: Newer research comparing routes of medication administration has extended beyond efficacy as a primary endpoint to incorporate patient preference. However, little is known about the preferences of pregnant women in terms of routes of medication administration, specifically with regards to hemorrhage prevention and control. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand the preferences of pregnant women in terms of medical interventions to prevent hemorrhage at the time of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Surveys were distributed from April 2022 to September 2022 using electronic tablets at a single urban center with an annual delivery volume of 3000 women per year to women >18 years of age who were either currently pregnant or have been pregnant in the past. Subjects were asked to choose their preferred route of administration from the following options: intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous. The primary outcome was patient preference on the route of medication administration during a hemorrhage event. RESULTS: The study cohort included 300 patients, mostly African American (39.8%) followed by White (32.1%), and the majority of the participants ranged from 30 to 34 years of age (31.7%). When asked which method of administration they would prefer to prevent hemorrhage before birth, the results were as follows: 31.1% would prefer intravenous, 23.0% had no preference, 21.2% were unsure, 15.9% preferred subcutaneous, and 8.8% preferred intramuscular administration. In addition, 69.4% of respondents reported that they have never declined or avoided intramuscular administration of medication if recommended by their physician. CONCLUSION: Although some survey participants preferred an intravenous route of administration, 68.9% of subjects were unsure, had no preference, or preferred nonintravenous routes. This information is helpful particularly in low-resource settings where intravenous treatments are not readily available or in urgent clinical situations in which intravenous administration routes are not easily obtainable in high-risk patients. Elsevier 2023-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10173762/ /pubmed/37180460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100195 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Cordes, Sophia A.
Nesson, Alexandra R.
Calderon, Joaquin
Abdelatif, Dinan S.
Ahmadzia, Homa K.
Acceptability of intramuscular injection of tranexamic acid in postpartum hemorrhage prevention
title Acceptability of intramuscular injection of tranexamic acid in postpartum hemorrhage prevention
title_full Acceptability of intramuscular injection of tranexamic acid in postpartum hemorrhage prevention
title_fullStr Acceptability of intramuscular injection of tranexamic acid in postpartum hemorrhage prevention
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of intramuscular injection of tranexamic acid in postpartum hemorrhage prevention
title_short Acceptability of intramuscular injection of tranexamic acid in postpartum hemorrhage prevention
title_sort acceptability of intramuscular injection of tranexamic acid in postpartum hemorrhage prevention
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37180460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100195
work_keys_str_mv AT cordessophiaa acceptabilityofintramuscularinjectionoftranexamicacidinpostpartumhemorrhageprevention
AT nessonalexandrar acceptabilityofintramuscularinjectionoftranexamicacidinpostpartumhemorrhageprevention
AT calderonjoaquin acceptabilityofintramuscularinjectionoftranexamicacidinpostpartumhemorrhageprevention
AT abdelatifdinans acceptabilityofintramuscularinjectionoftranexamicacidinpostpartumhemorrhageprevention
AT ahmadziahomak acceptabilityofintramuscularinjectionoftranexamicacidinpostpartumhemorrhageprevention