Cargando…
Simulation-based Ultrasound Curriculum for Novice Clinicians to Assess Neonatal Endotracheal Tube Position
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of a simulation-based mastery curriculum to train clinicians with limited-to-no sonography experience how to use ultrasound (US) to assess neonatal endotracheal tube (ETT) positioning. METHODS: In a single-centered, prospective, educational study, 29 neonatology...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37180626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmu.jmu_143_21 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of a simulation-based mastery curriculum to train clinicians with limited-to-no sonography experience how to use ultrasound (US) to assess neonatal endotracheal tube (ETT) positioning. METHODS: In a single-centered, prospective, educational study, 29 neonatology clinicians participated in a simulation-based mastery curriculum composed of a didactic lecture, followed by a one-on-one simulation session using a newly designed, three-dimensional (3D) printed US phantom model of the neonatal trachea and aorta. After mastery training, clinicians were evaluated with a performance checklist on their skills obtaining US images and assessing ETT positioning in the US phantom model. They also completed pre- and postcurriculum knowledge assessment tests and self-assessment surveys. The data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean checklist score improved significantly during three attempts (mean difference: 2.6552; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2578–3.0525; P < 0.0001). The mean time to perform US decreased significantly from the first to third attempt (mean difference: −1.8276 min; 95% CI: −3.3391 to − 0.3161; P = 0.0196). In addition, there was a significant improvement in median knowledge assessment scores (50% vs. 80%; P < 0.0001) and survey ratings on knowledge and self-efficacy (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Clinicians with limited-to-no sonography experience demonstrated improved knowledge and skill acquisition in using US to assess ETT positioning through simulation-based mastery training. The use of 3D modeling enhances simulation experiences and optimizes the quality of training during limited opportunities to achieve procedural competency in a controlled environment before further application into the clinical setting. |
---|