Cargando…

Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients’ perspectives

BACKGROUND: Virtual data collection methods and consent procedures adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic enabled continued research activities, but also introduced concerns about equity, inclusivity, representation, and privacy. Recent studies have explored these issues from institutional and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Small, Serena S, Lau, Erica, McFarlane, Kassandra, Archambault, Patrick M, Longstaff, Holly, Hohl, Corinne M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01933-5
_version_ 1785039922429689856
author Small, Serena S
Lau, Erica
McFarlane, Kassandra
Archambault, Patrick M
Longstaff, Holly
Hohl, Corinne M
author_facet Small, Serena S
Lau, Erica
McFarlane, Kassandra
Archambault, Patrick M
Longstaff, Holly
Hohl, Corinne M
author_sort Small, Serena S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Virtual data collection methods and consent procedures adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic enabled continued research activities, but also introduced concerns about equity, inclusivity, representation, and privacy. Recent studies have explored these issues from institutional and researcher perspectives, but there is a need to explore patient perspectives and preferences. This study aims to explore COVID-19 patients’ perspectives about research recruitment and consent for research studies about COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory qualitative focus group and interview study among British Columbian adults who self-identified as having had COVID-19. We recruited participants through personal contacts, social media, and REACH BC, an online platform that connects researchers and patients in British Columbia. We analyzed transcripts inductively and developed thematic summaries of each coding element. RESULTS: Of the 22 individuals recruited, 16 attended a focus group or interview. We found that autonomy and the feasibility of participation, attitudes toward research about COVID-19, and privacy concerns are key factors that influence participants’ willingness to participate in research. We also found that participants preferred remote and virtual approaches for contact, consent, and delivery of research on COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who had COVID-19 are motivated to participate in research studies and value autonomy in their decision to participate, but researchers must be sensitive and considerate toward patient preferences and concerns, particularly as researchers adopt virtual recruitment and data collection methods. Such awareness may increase research participation and engagement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-023-01933-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10173898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101738982023-05-13 Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients’ perspectives Small, Serena S Lau, Erica McFarlane, Kassandra Archambault, Patrick M Longstaff, Holly Hohl, Corinne M BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Virtual data collection methods and consent procedures adopted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic enabled continued research activities, but also introduced concerns about equity, inclusivity, representation, and privacy. Recent studies have explored these issues from institutional and researcher perspectives, but there is a need to explore patient perspectives and preferences. This study aims to explore COVID-19 patients’ perspectives about research recruitment and consent for research studies about COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory qualitative focus group and interview study among British Columbian adults who self-identified as having had COVID-19. We recruited participants through personal contacts, social media, and REACH BC, an online platform that connects researchers and patients in British Columbia. We analyzed transcripts inductively and developed thematic summaries of each coding element. RESULTS: Of the 22 individuals recruited, 16 attended a focus group or interview. We found that autonomy and the feasibility of participation, attitudes toward research about COVID-19, and privacy concerns are key factors that influence participants’ willingness to participate in research. We also found that participants preferred remote and virtual approaches for contact, consent, and delivery of research on COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who had COVID-19 are motivated to participate in research studies and value autonomy in their decision to participate, but researchers must be sensitive and considerate toward patient preferences and concerns, particularly as researchers adopt virtual recruitment and data collection methods. Such awareness may increase research participation and engagement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-023-01933-5. BioMed Central 2023-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10173898/ /pubmed/37170077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01933-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Small, Serena S
Lau, Erica
McFarlane, Kassandra
Archambault, Patrick M
Longstaff, Holly
Hohl, Corinne M
Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients’ perspectives
title Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients’ perspectives
title_full Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients’ perspectives
title_fullStr Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients’ perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients’ perspectives
title_short Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients’ perspectives
title_sort research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of covid-19 patients’ perspectives
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01933-5
work_keys_str_mv AT smallserenas researchrecruitmentandconsentmethodsinapandemicaqualitativestudyofcovid19patientsperspectives
AT lauerica researchrecruitmentandconsentmethodsinapandemicaqualitativestudyofcovid19patientsperspectives
AT mcfarlanekassandra researchrecruitmentandconsentmethodsinapandemicaqualitativestudyofcovid19patientsperspectives
AT archambaultpatrickm researchrecruitmentandconsentmethodsinapandemicaqualitativestudyofcovid19patientsperspectives
AT longstaffholly researchrecruitmentandconsentmethodsinapandemicaqualitativestudyofcovid19patientsperspectives
AT hohlcorinnem researchrecruitmentandconsentmethodsinapandemicaqualitativestudyofcovid19patientsperspectives