Cargando…
Evaluation of health utility in trial-based cost–utility analyses for major cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: The global incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is high, and the medical costs associated with its management have been increasing. Cost–utility analyses (CUAs) are essential for understanding the value of healthcare interventions and for decision-making. A majority of the CUAs fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067045 |
_version_ | 1785039941744459776 |
---|---|
author | Nakao, Yasuhisa Kawakami, Hiroshi Miyazaki, Shigehiro Saito, Makoto Luo, Yan Yamamoto, Kazumichi Yamaguchi, Osamu |
author_facet | Nakao, Yasuhisa Kawakami, Hiroshi Miyazaki, Shigehiro Saito, Makoto Luo, Yan Yamamoto, Kazumichi Yamaguchi, Osamu |
author_sort | Nakao, Yasuhisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The global incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is high, and the medical costs associated with its management have been increasing. Cost–utility analyses (CUAs) are essential for understanding the value of healthcare interventions and for decision-making. A majority of the CUAs for CVD are model based and have cited health utilities from previously published data; standard health utilities for the CUAs of CVD have not been established yet. Thus, we aim to identify the standard utilities according to the patients’ condition and disease severity in patients with major CVDs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search Medline and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews for trial-based CUA studies that have reported on quality-adjusted life-years using original health utilities for patients with three major forms of CVD (coronary artery disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation). Papers on trial-based CUAs will be included, while those on model-based CUAs will be excluded. No restrictions will be made in terms of intervention type. The main outcome comprises the health utilities calculated on a scale of 0–1 (irrespective of the measurement methods) at baseline and after treatment. Two independent investigators will screen the eligibility of articles; they will extract data, including health utilities, from the eligible articles for further analysis. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. We will describe the means and SDs of the health utilities from all the included studies. The mean utility weights for individual studies will be combined through meta-analyses using a random-effects model to obtain the representative health utility value for each disease. Subgroup analyses will be conducted according to the severity and duration of each disease. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. The review will be submitted to an appropriate peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022316278. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10173991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101739912023-05-12 Evaluation of health utility in trial-based cost–utility analyses for major cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review Nakao, Yasuhisa Kawakami, Hiroshi Miyazaki, Shigehiro Saito, Makoto Luo, Yan Yamamoto, Kazumichi Yamaguchi, Osamu BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: The global incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is high, and the medical costs associated with its management have been increasing. Cost–utility analyses (CUAs) are essential for understanding the value of healthcare interventions and for decision-making. A majority of the CUAs for CVD are model based and have cited health utilities from previously published data; standard health utilities for the CUAs of CVD have not been established yet. Thus, we aim to identify the standard utilities according to the patients’ condition and disease severity in patients with major CVDs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search Medline and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews for trial-based CUA studies that have reported on quality-adjusted life-years using original health utilities for patients with three major forms of CVD (coronary artery disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation). Papers on trial-based CUAs will be included, while those on model-based CUAs will be excluded. No restrictions will be made in terms of intervention type. The main outcome comprises the health utilities calculated on a scale of 0–1 (irrespective of the measurement methods) at baseline and after treatment. Two independent investigators will screen the eligibility of articles; they will extract data, including health utilities, from the eligible articles for further analysis. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. We will describe the means and SDs of the health utilities from all the included studies. The mean utility weights for individual studies will be combined through meta-analyses using a random-effects model to obtain the representative health utility value for each disease. Subgroup analyses will be conducted according to the severity and duration of each disease. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. The review will be submitted to an appropriate peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022316278. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10173991/ /pubmed/37160387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067045 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Nakao, Yasuhisa Kawakami, Hiroshi Miyazaki, Shigehiro Saito, Makoto Luo, Yan Yamamoto, Kazumichi Yamaguchi, Osamu Evaluation of health utility in trial-based cost–utility analyses for major cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review |
title | Evaluation of health utility in trial-based cost–utility analyses for major cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Evaluation of health utility in trial-based cost–utility analyses for major cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of health utility in trial-based cost–utility analyses for major cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of health utility in trial-based cost–utility analyses for major cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Evaluation of health utility in trial-based cost–utility analyses for major cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | evaluation of health utility in trial-based cost–utility analyses for major cardiovascular disease: protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10173991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37160387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakaoyasuhisa evaluationofhealthutilityintrialbasedcostutilityanalysesformajorcardiovasculardiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview AT kawakamihiroshi evaluationofhealthutilityintrialbasedcostutilityanalysesformajorcardiovasculardiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview AT miyazakishigehiro evaluationofhealthutilityintrialbasedcostutilityanalysesformajorcardiovasculardiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview AT saitomakoto evaluationofhealthutilityintrialbasedcostutilityanalysesformajorcardiovasculardiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview AT luoyan evaluationofhealthutilityintrialbasedcostutilityanalysesformajorcardiovasculardiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview AT yamamotokazumichi evaluationofhealthutilityintrialbasedcostutilityanalysesformajorcardiovasculardiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview AT yamaguchiosamu evaluationofhealthutilityintrialbasedcostutilityanalysesformajorcardiovasculardiseaseprotocolforasystematicreview |