Cargando…
Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer remains a highly fatal disease. Surgical resection has been proven to be the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. The conventional hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is shown to reduce symptoms, improve exercise capacity and impact the quality of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37156593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067845 |
_version_ | 1785039951566471168 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jiao Li, Ran Chang, Junke Wang, Yan Lai, Yutian Dong, Yingxian Che, Guowei |
author_facet | Wang, Jiao Li, Ran Chang, Junke Wang, Yan Lai, Yutian Dong, Yingxian Che, Guowei |
author_sort | Wang, Jiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer remains a highly fatal disease. Surgical resection has been proven to be the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. The conventional hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is shown to reduce symptoms, improve exercise capacity and impact the quality of life (QoL) for lung cancer patients. To date, scientific evidence on the effectiveness of home-based PR for patients with lung cancer following surgery is scarce. We aim to explore if home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a two-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Participants will be recruited from West China Hospital, Sichuan University and randomly allocated to either an outpatient group or a home-based group at a ratio of 1:1. The PR programme involves self-management and exercises. The exercise includes warm-up (10 min), aerobic training (20 min), resistance training (15 min) and cool-down (10 min), lasting 4 weeks, with two sessions per week either at home or in the outpatient setting. The intensity will be adjusted according to the modified Borg rating of perceived exertion and heart rate before and after each exercise session. The primary outcome is QoL measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 & LC 13 after an intervention. Secondary outcomes include physical fitness measured by a 6 min walk test and stair-climbing test and symptom severity measured by patient-reported questionnaires and pulmonary function. The main hypothesis is that home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the Ethical Committee of West China Hospital and is also registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100053714. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10174035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101740352023-05-12 Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial Wang, Jiao Li, Ran Chang, Junke Wang, Yan Lai, Yutian Dong, Yingxian Che, Guowei BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer remains a highly fatal disease. Surgical resection has been proven to be the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. The conventional hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is shown to reduce symptoms, improve exercise capacity and impact the quality of life (QoL) for lung cancer patients. To date, scientific evidence on the effectiveness of home-based PR for patients with lung cancer following surgery is scarce. We aim to explore if home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a two-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Participants will be recruited from West China Hospital, Sichuan University and randomly allocated to either an outpatient group or a home-based group at a ratio of 1:1. The PR programme involves self-management and exercises. The exercise includes warm-up (10 min), aerobic training (20 min), resistance training (15 min) and cool-down (10 min), lasting 4 weeks, with two sessions per week either at home or in the outpatient setting. The intensity will be adjusted according to the modified Borg rating of perceived exertion and heart rate before and after each exercise session. The primary outcome is QoL measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 & LC 13 after an intervention. Secondary outcomes include physical fitness measured by a 6 min walk test and stair-climbing test and symptom severity measured by patient-reported questionnaires and pulmonary function. The main hypothesis is that home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the Ethical Committee of West China Hospital and is also registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100053714. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10174035/ /pubmed/37156593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067845 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Wang, Jiao Li, Ran Chang, Junke Wang, Yan Lai, Yutian Dong, Yingxian Che, Guowei Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial |
title | Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37156593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjiao qualityoflifebetweenhomebasedandoutpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientsaftersurgicalresectionforlungcancerprotocolforaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT liran qualityoflifebetweenhomebasedandoutpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientsaftersurgicalresectionforlungcancerprotocolforaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT changjunke qualityoflifebetweenhomebasedandoutpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientsaftersurgicalresectionforlungcancerprotocolforaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wangyan qualityoflifebetweenhomebasedandoutpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientsaftersurgicalresectionforlungcancerprotocolforaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT laiyutian qualityoflifebetweenhomebasedandoutpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientsaftersurgicalresectionforlungcancerprotocolforaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dongyingxian qualityoflifebetweenhomebasedandoutpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientsaftersurgicalresectionforlungcancerprotocolforaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cheguowei qualityoflifebetweenhomebasedandoutpatientpulmonaryrehabilitationinpatientsaftersurgicalresectionforlungcancerprotocolforaprospectivesingleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial |