Cargando…
Effectiveness of Single Chest Tube vs Double Chest Tube Application Postdecortication: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Draining the chest cavity with 2 tubes is a common practice among thoracic surgeons. This research was conducted in Addis Ababa from March 2021 to May 2022. A total of 62 patients were included. STUDY DESIGN: This study was conducted to investigate the superiority of either single or double tube ins...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36808127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000000661 |
_version_ | 1785039962296549376 |
---|---|
author | Hart, Jonathan Minagogo Hussien, Anwar Mohammed Tesfaye, Samuel Nadamo, Siyasebew Mamo Senbu, Mekonnen Feyissa Wadaja, Desalegn Fekadu Bacha, Isreal Tadesse Tebeje, Hiwot Gebeyehu |
author_facet | Hart, Jonathan Minagogo Hussien, Anwar Mohammed Tesfaye, Samuel Nadamo, Siyasebew Mamo Senbu, Mekonnen Feyissa Wadaja, Desalegn Fekadu Bacha, Isreal Tadesse Tebeje, Hiwot Gebeyehu |
author_sort | Hart, Jonathan Minagogo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Draining the chest cavity with 2 tubes is a common practice among thoracic surgeons. This research was conducted in Addis Ababa from March 2021 to May 2022. A total of 62 patients were included. STUDY DESIGN: This study was conducted to investigate the superiority of either single or double tube insertion after decortication. Patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1. In group A, 2 tubes were inserted; in group B, single 32F tubes were inserted. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 27.0, Student’s t test and Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: The age range of patients was 18 to 70 years, with a mean of 44 ± 14.4434 years; the male to female ratio was 2.9:1. The dominant underlying pathologies were tuberculosis and trauma (45.2% vs 35.5%); the right side was more involved (62.3%). Drain output was 1,465 ± 1,887.9751 mL in group A vs 1,018 ± 802.5662 mL in group B (p value = 0.00001); the duration of drains was 7.5498 ± 11.3137 days in group A vs 3.8730 ± 1.4142 days in group B (p value = 0.000042). The degree of pain was 2.6458 ± 4.2426 vs 2.000 ± 2.1213 in group A and group B, respectively (p value = 0.326757). The length of hospital stay was 21.5818 ± 11.9791 days in group A vs 13.6091 ± 6.2048 days in group B (p value = 0.00001). Group A had air leak of 90.3% vs 74.2% in group B; subcutaneous emphysema was 9.7% in group A and 12.9% in group B. There was no fluid recollection, and no patients required tube reinsertion. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of a single tube after decortication is effective in reducing drain output, time of drain, and hospital stay. There was no association with pain, and there was no effect on other endpoints. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10174098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101740982023-05-12 Effectiveness of Single Chest Tube vs Double Chest Tube Application Postdecortication: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Hart, Jonathan Minagogo Hussien, Anwar Mohammed Tesfaye, Samuel Nadamo, Siyasebew Mamo Senbu, Mekonnen Feyissa Wadaja, Desalegn Fekadu Bacha, Isreal Tadesse Tebeje, Hiwot Gebeyehu J Am Coll Surg Original Scientific Articles Draining the chest cavity with 2 tubes is a common practice among thoracic surgeons. This research was conducted in Addis Ababa from March 2021 to May 2022. A total of 62 patients were included. STUDY DESIGN: This study was conducted to investigate the superiority of either single or double tube insertion after decortication. Patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1. In group A, 2 tubes were inserted; in group B, single 32F tubes were inserted. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 27.0, Student’s t test and Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: The age range of patients was 18 to 70 years, with a mean of 44 ± 14.4434 years; the male to female ratio was 2.9:1. The dominant underlying pathologies were tuberculosis and trauma (45.2% vs 35.5%); the right side was more involved (62.3%). Drain output was 1,465 ± 1,887.9751 mL in group A vs 1,018 ± 802.5662 mL in group B (p value = 0.00001); the duration of drains was 7.5498 ± 11.3137 days in group A vs 3.8730 ± 1.4142 days in group B (p value = 0.000042). The degree of pain was 2.6458 ± 4.2426 vs 2.000 ± 2.1213 in group A and group B, respectively (p value = 0.326757). The length of hospital stay was 21.5818 ± 11.9791 days in group A vs 13.6091 ± 6.2048 days in group B (p value = 0.00001). Group A had air leak of 90.3% vs 74.2% in group B; subcutaneous emphysema was 9.7% in group A and 12.9% in group B. There was no fluid recollection, and no patients required tube reinsertion. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of a single tube after decortication is effective in reducing drain output, time of drain, and hospital stay. There was no association with pain, and there was no effect on other endpoints. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-20 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10174098/ /pubmed/36808127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000000661 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 [CCBY-NC-ND] (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Articles Hart, Jonathan Minagogo Hussien, Anwar Mohammed Tesfaye, Samuel Nadamo, Siyasebew Mamo Senbu, Mekonnen Feyissa Wadaja, Desalegn Fekadu Bacha, Isreal Tadesse Tebeje, Hiwot Gebeyehu Effectiveness of Single Chest Tube vs Double Chest Tube Application Postdecortication: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title | Effectiveness of Single Chest Tube vs Double Chest Tube Application Postdecortication: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full | Effectiveness of Single Chest Tube vs Double Chest Tube Application Postdecortication: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Single Chest Tube vs Double Chest Tube Application Postdecortication: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Single Chest Tube vs Double Chest Tube Application Postdecortication: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_short | Effectiveness of Single Chest Tube vs Double Chest Tube Application Postdecortication: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study |
title_sort | effectiveness of single chest tube vs double chest tube application postdecortication: prospective randomized controlled study |
topic | Original Scientific Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36808127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000000661 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartjonathanminagogo effectivenessofsinglechesttubevsdoublechesttubeapplicationpostdecorticationprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hussienanwarmohammed effectivenessofsinglechesttubevsdoublechesttubeapplicationpostdecorticationprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT tesfayesamuel effectivenessofsinglechesttubevsdoublechesttubeapplicationpostdecorticationprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT nadamosiyasebewmamo effectivenessofsinglechesttubevsdoublechesttubeapplicationpostdecorticationprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT senbumekonnenfeyissa effectivenessofsinglechesttubevsdoublechesttubeapplicationpostdecorticationprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT wadajadesalegnfekadu effectivenessofsinglechesttubevsdoublechesttubeapplicationpostdecorticationprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT bachaisrealtadesse effectivenessofsinglechesttubevsdoublechesttubeapplicationpostdecorticationprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT tebejehiwotgebeyehu effectivenessofsinglechesttubevsdoublechesttubeapplicationpostdecorticationprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy |