Cargando…
Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy
Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and durin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37171305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033758 |
_version_ | 1785040024899682304 |
---|---|
author | Sağir, Mehmet Güven, Erdem Eröz, Seda Uras, Cihan |
author_facet | Sağir, Mehmet Güven, Erdem Eröz, Seda Uras, Cihan |
author_sort | Sağir, Mehmet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and during surgery. We aimed to obtain natural and stable breast reconstruction with this algorithm. In addition, we also aimed to evaluate which implants were selected using this algorithm and their short- and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study included 218 patients aged 27 to 60 years who underwent mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2021. The patients were assigned into 4 groups according to amount of breast tissue removed. We developed a 10-step algorithm and these included: breast base, amount of breast tissue removed, evaluation of mastectomy skin flap, breast projection, ptosis, unilateral/bilateral reconstruction, chest wall deformity, patient’s request, comorbid conditions and stabilization and arrangement of novel sulcus. The evaluation was made when the patient’s photographs were taken at least 1 year after the surgery. The highest number of patients was recorded in group 3; in addition, mean age was also highest in group 3. The lowest number of patients was recorded in group 4. The body mass index showed a progressive increase from group 1 to group 4. Medium height moderate profile prosthesis was used in 81.7% while medium height moderate plus profile prosthesis was used in 18.3% of breasts included. We used larger prosthesis up to 58.1% when compared to the tissue removed in group 1 while we used smaller prosthesis by 25.6% in group 4. In the anterior view, the medial and lateral arch of the lower pole of the breast was obtained in all patients. Obvious asymmetry developed in 4 patients. In lateral and oblique views, upper and lower pole natural breast images were obtained in all patients, except for 5 patients. There was no sulcus inferior displacement in any patient. Implant extrusion did not occur in any patient. This algorithm is an easy to use and effective method to obtain a stable and natural breast image in the long-term. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10174419 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101744192023-05-12 Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy Sağir, Mehmet Güven, Erdem Eröz, Seda Uras, Cihan Medicine (Baltimore) 5750 Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and during surgery. We aimed to obtain natural and stable breast reconstruction with this algorithm. In addition, we also aimed to evaluate which implants were selected using this algorithm and their short- and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study included 218 patients aged 27 to 60 years who underwent mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2021. The patients were assigned into 4 groups according to amount of breast tissue removed. We developed a 10-step algorithm and these included: breast base, amount of breast tissue removed, evaluation of mastectomy skin flap, breast projection, ptosis, unilateral/bilateral reconstruction, chest wall deformity, patient’s request, comorbid conditions and stabilization and arrangement of novel sulcus. The evaluation was made when the patient’s photographs were taken at least 1 year after the surgery. The highest number of patients was recorded in group 3; in addition, mean age was also highest in group 3. The lowest number of patients was recorded in group 4. The body mass index showed a progressive increase from group 1 to group 4. Medium height moderate profile prosthesis was used in 81.7% while medium height moderate plus profile prosthesis was used in 18.3% of breasts included. We used larger prosthesis up to 58.1% when compared to the tissue removed in group 1 while we used smaller prosthesis by 25.6% in group 4. In the anterior view, the medial and lateral arch of the lower pole of the breast was obtained in all patients. Obvious asymmetry developed in 4 patients. In lateral and oblique views, upper and lower pole natural breast images were obtained in all patients, except for 5 patients. There was no sulcus inferior displacement in any patient. Implant extrusion did not occur in any patient. This algorithm is an easy to use and effective method to obtain a stable and natural breast image in the long-term. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10174419/ /pubmed/37171305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033758 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | 5750 Sağir, Mehmet Güven, Erdem Eröz, Seda Uras, Cihan Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy |
title | Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy |
title_full | Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy |
title_fullStr | Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy |
title_short | Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy |
title_sort | implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy |
topic | 5750 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174419/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37171305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagirmehmet implantselectioninnaturalandstabledirecttoimplantreconstructionwithtenstepsatnipplesparingmastectomy AT guvenerdem implantselectioninnaturalandstabledirecttoimplantreconstructionwithtenstepsatnipplesparingmastectomy AT erozseda implantselectioninnaturalandstabledirecttoimplantreconstructionwithtenstepsatnipplesparingmastectomy AT urascihan implantselectioninnaturalandstabledirecttoimplantreconstructionwithtenstepsatnipplesparingmastectomy |