Cargando…

Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for patients with Geographic Atrophy (GA) is currently unknown. This study therefore aimed to investigate the extent to which regular intravitreal injections may be acceptable to GA patients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Thirty UK-base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Enoch, Jamie, Ghulakhszian, Arevik, Sekhon, Mandeep, Crabb, David P., Taylor, Deanna J., Dinah, Christiana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02571-3
_version_ 1785145849471303680
author Enoch, Jamie
Ghulakhszian, Arevik
Sekhon, Mandeep
Crabb, David P.
Taylor, Deanna J.
Dinah, Christiana
author_facet Enoch, Jamie
Ghulakhszian, Arevik
Sekhon, Mandeep
Crabb, David P.
Taylor, Deanna J.
Dinah, Christiana
author_sort Enoch, Jamie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for patients with Geographic Atrophy (GA) is currently unknown. This study therefore aimed to investigate the extent to which regular intravitreal injections may be acceptable to GA patients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Thirty UK-based individuals with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), recruited from two London-based hospitals, were interviewed in April-October 2021 regarding acceptability of new GA treatments. Participants responded to a structured questionnaire, as well as open-ended questions in a semi-structured interview. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) informed framework analysis of the qualitative data. RESULTS: Twenty participants (67%) were female, and median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 83 (78, 87) years. 37% of participants had foveal centre-involving GA, and better eye median (IQR) logMAR visual acuity was 0.30 (0.17, 0.58). Data suggested that 18 participants (60% (95% CI: 41–79%)) would accept the treatment, despite awareness of potential drawbacks. Eight participants (27% (95% CI: 10–43%) were ambivalent or undecided about treatment, and four (13%) (95% CI: 0–26%) would be unlikely to accept treatment. Reducing the frequency of injections from monthly to every other month increased the proportion of participants who considered the treatments acceptable. Conversely, factors limiting acceptability clustered around: the limited magnitude of treatment efficacy; concerns about side effects or the increased risk of neovascular AMD; and the logistical burden of regular clinic visits for intravitreal injections. Misunderstandings of potential benefits indicate the need for appropriately-designed patient education tools to support decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a majority of participants would be positive about intravitreal treatment for GA, in spite of potential burdens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10174603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101746032023-12-01 Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study Enoch, Jamie Ghulakhszian, Arevik Sekhon, Mandeep Crabb, David P. Taylor, Deanna J. Dinah, Christiana Eye (Lond) Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for patients with Geographic Atrophy (GA) is currently unknown. This study therefore aimed to investigate the extent to which regular intravitreal injections may be acceptable to GA patients. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Thirty UK-based individuals with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), recruited from two London-based hospitals, were interviewed in April-October 2021 regarding acceptability of new GA treatments. Participants responded to a structured questionnaire, as well as open-ended questions in a semi-structured interview. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) informed framework analysis of the qualitative data. RESULTS: Twenty participants (67%) were female, and median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 83 (78, 87) years. 37% of participants had foveal centre-involving GA, and better eye median (IQR) logMAR visual acuity was 0.30 (0.17, 0.58). Data suggested that 18 participants (60% (95% CI: 41–79%)) would accept the treatment, despite awareness of potential drawbacks. Eight participants (27% (95% CI: 10–43%) were ambivalent or undecided about treatment, and four (13%) (95% CI: 0–26%) would be unlikely to accept treatment. Reducing the frequency of injections from monthly to every other month increased the proportion of participants who considered the treatments acceptable. Conversely, factors limiting acceptability clustered around: the limited magnitude of treatment efficacy; concerns about side effects or the increased risk of neovascular AMD; and the logistical burden of regular clinic visits for intravitreal injections. Misunderstandings of potential benefits indicate the need for appropriately-designed patient education tools to support decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a majority of participants would be positive about intravitreal treatment for GA, in spite of potential burdens. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-11 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10174603/ /pubmed/37170013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02571-3 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
spellingShingle Article
Enoch, Jamie
Ghulakhszian, Arevik
Sekhon, Mandeep
Crabb, David P.
Taylor, Deanna J.
Dinah, Christiana
Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study
title Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study
title_full Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study
title_short Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study
title_sort exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: a mixed-methods study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10174603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02571-3
work_keys_str_mv AT enochjamie exploringpatientacceptabilityofemergingintravitrealtherapiesforgeographicatrophyamixedmethodsstudy
AT ghulakhszianarevik exploringpatientacceptabilityofemergingintravitrealtherapiesforgeographicatrophyamixedmethodsstudy
AT sekhonmandeep exploringpatientacceptabilityofemergingintravitrealtherapiesforgeographicatrophyamixedmethodsstudy
AT crabbdavidp exploringpatientacceptabilityofemergingintravitrealtherapiesforgeographicatrophyamixedmethodsstudy
AT taylordeannaj exploringpatientacceptabilityofemergingintravitrealtherapiesforgeographicatrophyamixedmethodsstudy
AT dinahchristiana exploringpatientacceptabilityofemergingintravitrealtherapiesforgeographicatrophyamixedmethodsstudy